I underestimated the Tea Party.
I really did. Once upon a time I thought, “Oh, hey, look, a gaggle of angry folks forged in the fires of a down economy and stirred up by passionate dipshit politicians. Ha ha ha, look at those silly misspelled protest signs! Oh, they think Obama is Kenyan Hitler, that’s so adorable. Hey, Bible misquotes! It’s like Tea Party Bingo up in this motherfucker.”
But time has permitted me a new perspective:
The Tea Party is actually pretty genius.
I mean, selfish as shit. Possibly possessing a few virulent strains of actual human evil. But really: genius! Like, if they weren’t such assholes, I might respect what they’re doing.”
Because what they’re doing is running a magic show full of illusions and tricks. They’re orchestrating a long-form confidence game, eyes on a distant prize.
Their bread and butter is not the political process but rather the illusion of one.
It’s all chicanery and legerdemain. Performed in service to what may be a creepy agenda. That agenda? To dismantle the power of the government and to reward private interests — not just in the systemic, “I want to bolster capitalism” sense, but to literally reward corporations and the very wealthy people who run them. Oh — and at your expense.
One. Big. Con.
The kind that might make David Mamet soak his britches.
Consider, for example, Ted Cruz’ filibuster — or, sorry, his “filibuster,” because it fucking wasn’t actually a fucking filibuster. Oh, sure. He called it that. The news calls it that. But it wasn’t. It was a really long speech organized and agreed upon by Harry Reid, meant to end at a preordained time and without having any effect at all. It let him prattle on, energizing his base, preaching from the pulpit, giving the illusion of having a practical and sustained effect when really he was just appeasing donors and speaking to his audience. He holds up a turd painted pink tucked in a hot dog bun and says, “Eat this delicious hot dog.”
And we all take a big shitty bite.
Consider, for example, how they claim to be a grassroots organization supporting the interest of the common American, but don’t really like to talk about who’s bankrolling all this shit (Rupert Murdoch, Koch Brothers, Dick Armey), all “big business” proponents who are happy to dismantle any and every safety net and regulation that keeps the actual common Americans from falling into a dark, hopeless pit.
You want a really great example? Consider the Philadelphia School District.
Which will close down in the next two years.
A whole school district, entirely or largely shuttered.
Think about that.
Now, think about how this sort of thing happens.
Pennsylvania elected, for some mysterious fucking reason, a Tea Partier as governor, Tom Corbett. (My opinions of Corbett are best understood as a series of angry vomiting sounds and rage-fueled poop noises.)
Corbett cuts a billion dollars out of state education. (This year’s budget is a little kinder, adding $50-some million to the pot, but that’s stuffing Band-Aids into a sucking chest wound what with massive shortfalls and deficits. It’s just enough to keep the schools open this year.)
You gut education and then say, “Hey, jeez, education isn’t looking too good? It’s like these teachers can’t teach! The system is failing!” Well, of course it is, jerkhead. You just stole the oxygen from the room and then are yelling about how folks are too weak to breathe.
So, with education gutted and 100% more ineffective than it was before…
PA invests money into a consulting group to examine how to make the school district more efficient; as a result the school district decides the best way forward is to allocate nearly a billion dollars toward a flush of charter schools — schools that are publicly funded but unregulated and privately operated and, oh, in Philadelphia, now mired in a series of scandals.
So, already we’ve taken money reserved for government operation of schools and thrown support in for private schooling entities.
Fine, except for the fact those must hurt by this are the underprivileged — meaning, lower-income, frequently African-American or minority students. (Here’s an interesting post as to why charter schools are bad for the urban poor of Philly and Pittsburgh.)
There exists, of course, a correlation between poor education and increased crime.
So, you reduce educational offerings, you increase crime.
Sounds bad.
Except:
Increased crime means increased prisoners.
Increased prisoners of the “non-white, urban” variety — people who almost universally vote Democrat. People who, once inside the prison system as having committed a felony…
…can no longer vote.
Like I said: pretty genius.
(This will be doubly genius if Pennsylvania starts to eventually do the Tea Party lean toward privatized prisons. Haven’t gone that way yet, far as I can tell.)
Point is, all this is a dog-and-pony show, a smoke-and-mirrors display to get you to Think One Thing so in order to accomplish Another Thing Entirely.
Which leads us to what may be a government shut-down.
Over the deficit.
Oh, wait, no — it’s not really about the deficit.
It’s about Obamacare.
But it’s also not really about Obamacare, either — because the ACA is actually based off of a conservative plan. They lie, screaming about government-run health care and death panels and other ludicrous myths about health care reform, all a series of easily-debunked lies uttered in order to continue supporting a Byzantine, obfuscatory system of piss-poor health care that presently fills the coffers of insurance companies who thrive off of our ignorance and confusion. (Translation: insurance lobbyists want to make sure that the insurance companies continue to get paid as much as they can, because that’s frequently how Giant-Ass Companies work. Which is fine, as long as our politicians are interested in helping individual Americans more than they are Giant-Ass Company Profits.)
And so they aim to shut down the government.
And possibly damage the economy in the process.
All to cry foul over health care reform that passed through the entire Democratic process without fail. It passed all three branches of government. And yet, this group of sore losers wants you to think they’re supporting the common American whose grandmother will be put on some death panel pogrom list where Obama personally shoots them in the back of the head.
The real rub is, what it does is show us — and the world — that our government is broken.
And that’s what the Tea Party wanted all along.
They operate from within — like cancer cells (or terrorist cells?) — undermining the very thing they claim to work for. They don’t want a functional government. Government big or small is the enemy. (A “post-democracy?”) The GOP tends to be more moderate in their view of government, but therein lies another genius illusion of the Tea Party, which is that they’re Republican. Spoiler alert: they’re not. They’ve just embedded themselves in that party like a tick under the skin because that’s how they ride their way into power. (And moderate Republicans are starting to figure this out, I think. Like someone who realizes far too late they invited a vampire to dinner and now he’s in the house and he’s eating all the pets oops oh well sorry.)
All a series of illusions.
Trickery to make you think they’re working for you.
A con game run on the common American.
Never mind that the common American is the one who gets hurt by a shutdown. Who gets fucked over by a damaged economy and unregulated, rampant corporate interests. The one who gets screwed by lost education and who gets thrown into a bloating prison system as a result.
The Tea Partiers wear our clothes and they sound like patriots, but they don’t give a weasel’s dick-whiskers about this country or the majority of the people in it.
They’re sexist. They’re racist. They care nothing for the young or most of the old.
They are the party of the Old White Dude Who Wants To Do What He Wants, So Fuck You.
They want to ride this horse until it breaks down and dies.
They’ll sell America to the first buyer.
They’re not the hostages.
*ends rant*
*takes a nap*
(Final note: I’m gonna leave the comments open, but should they get hairy, I’m closing ’em down. I’ll likely not have time to respond to comments. I wanted to rant, and so, I ranted. I’m busy enough where I probably shouldn’t have even carved out the time to write this post, much less get mired in discussions about it. Also to clarify, I’m not anti-GOP, nor do I think the Democrats are the shining party of goodness here to save the day on a galloping golden steed. I tend to vote pretty moderate — leaning toward moderate politicians of both parties — and I have my back up about the NSA and drone-strikes and all kinds of other shit Obama approves on a daily, but this rant rose up after reading about the potential shutdown.)
terribleminds says:
(link fixed, re: hostage-takers)
September 30, 2013 — 8:32 PM
Frank Freudberg says:
I second that emotion.
September 30, 2013 — 8:35 PM
Lisa Maxwell says:
*applauds*
September 30, 2013 — 8:39 PM
Toni Rakestraw says:
*standing ovation*
September 30, 2013 — 8:43 PM
J.A. Kazimer says:
Hell yeah!
September 30, 2013 — 8:43 PM
Heather Severson says:
YESSS! WOOOO HOOOOOO! STANDING OVATION FROM THE MERCENARY WRITER. Let’s use our words for political action!
September 30, 2013 — 8:44 PM
J.R. Williams says:
Feel better now? You shouldn’t keep that much bile bottled up. Not good for your health…
September 30, 2013 — 8:48 PM
joshuamneff says:
I wouldn’t dream of Godwinning this by comparing the Tea Party to Nazis (because it’s a horrible comparison anyway), but I do think it’s worth comparing the Tea Party’s rhetoric and actions with Umberto Eco’s ur-Fascism:
http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_blackshirt.html
September 30, 2013 — 8:50 PM
capitola54 says:
Excellent rant. Especially about public schools. Few things get better by being abandoned.
Tom Corbett is right up there in rankness with Rick (“I was never actually indicted for fraud”) Scott, who’s done his best to screw women, minorities, and schools here in Florida.
Enjoy Brisbane.
September 30, 2013 — 8:52 PM
David Wohlreich (@wallrike) says:
What do you say when you want to say “amen” but you think you should only say amen to things that carry hope or an uplifting truth and not the kind of thing that sits in your guts and twists and makes you angry and sad and very alone? ‘Cause that.
September 30, 2013 — 8:52 PM
momdude says:
I keep hoping that Cruz & Paul & Boehner will show up with a normal CR at about 11:59 and say, “What, you thought we were actually crazy enough to do that shit? It was all a performance art piece for a new reality show on FX this spring!” Then I read the news and realize that they really, really are that fucking crazy.
September 30, 2013 — 8:56 PM
mercutio01 says:
Nope. Can’t ignore the nonsense from a supposedly well-informed author. Can’t ignore the personal attacks with zero basis in fact. Sorry. I know I’m only one dude, but you lost yourself a reader with the ignorant bullshit you spouted today.
Maybe next time you ought to try to be more human, try to avoid logical fallacies (at least five that I can point directly to), try not to dehumanize people with whom you disagree, try not to use war idioms over simple intellectual disagreements. To maybe believe that there really are good, honest, 98.6 degree, red-blooded humans that make up the organization, people who aren’t stodgy old white dudes who are racist, sexist, homophobes, who are actually part of a real grass-roots movement despite your bullshit statements to the contrary. To realize that your nonsense broad-brush generalizations are not only a problem, but the very definition of the exact problem you’re bitching about.
No one, and I mean no one, is as one-dimensional as the nonsense you wasted all those minutes of your life writing about.
My $20 on your books (and the lack of it in the future) won’t hurt you at all, but neither do I think you’re worth wasting that money on. Not anymore. Political differences I can handle, but not the minimizing generalizations and direct personal attacks on me and people I know, people who do not fit your straight-jacket of absolute and utter nonsense.
September 30, 2013 — 8:58 PM
terribleminds says:
I’m sure there are plenty of folks who support the Tea Party who are so-called “good” and “honest” folk. But I can’t abide folks who support a movement that has always been racist, sexist, classist, and deeply ignorant to the core no matter how reportedly good or honest they may feel themselves to be. It’s ugly business and I’m happy to give the Tea Party and its members a big ol’ honking middle finger waggled about and set on fire.
I’m never thrilled about losing a sale, but I’m betting that if you didn’t like this post, you probably wouldn’t like my books. I’m sure other writers out there will have belief systems you can more easily abide. Good luck.
September 30, 2013 — 9:09 PM
Wilson says:
Actually, Chuck, I for one did enjoy your books. I’m pretty sure I never saw any rants like this in them.
And if you’re so outraged about the Tea Party, maybe you should check who you support, or your party of choice. Because you’ll find a whole lot more of what you’re so angry about hidden beneath the covers.
I especially enjoyed the ‘so-called “good” and “honest” folk’ comment, with fingers clearly in the air to highlight the falseness of that claim. Very disappointed, I thought better of you than this.
October 1, 2013 — 1:33 PM
terribleminds says:
Better than what, exactly? I’m angry. I believe in what I’m saying. I don’t believe in being even-keeled and acquiescent when it comes to calling out something that’s truly toxic.
Listen, here’s the thing. You either like my books enough where what I say matters, or you don’t like them enough where what I say changes your mind on my books. If the latter’s the case, so be it. But I am who I am and I believe what I believe and I’m not going to be cowed into silence over the threat of losing a few book sales. I have the right to speak my mind whether or not you agree with it — and you have the right to disagree with it, too.
As a sidenote, this post is in line with what I’ve written before, both here and in my books. I’m not hiding this stuff.
— c.
October 1, 2013 — 1:39 PM
aileenmiles says:
Chuck, you deserve bonus points for understanding and accepting the consequences of free speech and not backing down with a cowardly non-apology, victim-blaming apology like so many other public figures are prone to do. Kudos!
October 2, 2013 — 7:42 AM
Gareth Skarka says:
What’s killing me is seeing my Twitter and Facebook feed filled with otherwise-intelligent people doing the “both sides are to blame/all politicians are bad/Congress (as in all of it, the institution) is to blame for this” bullshit dance.
Sorry, no — this is solidly pinned to about 40 or so neo-fascist dickbags who represent places like Lower Stumblefuck, Kansas (my neck of the woods, sadly). ….and that’s not a Godwinism, etiher. Check out Dr. Lawrence Britt’s ’14 Tenets of Fascism’ and tell me it doesn’t ring a few bells: http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html
But the media pushes the false equivalence argument, and people mindlessly parrot it — and suddenly something that is clearly destructive action being taken by clearly-identifiable individuals is now somehow “a plague on both your houses.”
September 30, 2013 — 9:04 PM
decayingorbits says:
FML. I swear, there doesn’t seem to be anyplace to go to get the fuck away from
Politics.
September 30, 2013 — 9:06 PM
terribleminds says:
I don’t post a whole lot of political stuff on here, but it is here because I feel it’s important and, frankly, it was burning a hole in my bonnet.
I don’t say this with any harm or foul, nor with any venom in my voice, but I totally understand if you just don’t want to read the posts on political subjects here. Not every post at this blog is meant for every reader universally.
September 30, 2013 — 9:11 PM
Craig says:
I see all these decisions as ideological choices, with distasteful real world repercussions that then lead to more extreme ideological choices. I find it reaching a little that all of this is a plan, rather than a reactionary moving from one step to the next. Even a massive increase in crime and convictions rate would probably (I don’t know the numbers) be only a drop in the bucket. More likely to affect voting numbers are the Voter ID laws. The same can be said for the various anti-abortion regulations.
The voter reactions to these developments, as a large group, have been almost completely negative. We’ve seen shifts in voter demographics as more and more moderates step away from the extremist view points of the tea party. Given the average age of Republican voters and by extension, Tea Party voters, I can’t help but come to the conclusion that time is the enemy of this party rather than it’s ally.
In short, I won’t ascribe something to malice when incompetence and stupidity fit just as well.
September 30, 2013 — 9:07 PM
catyorkc says:
I got my email with your post title and laughed out loud, but as I started reading I just got angry again. I’m so angry this time. They really are proving they can do whatever they want because they truly do not care about government.
September 30, 2013 — 9:08 PM
Erica says:
Well said, though I don’t think the tea party is separate from the Republican party. They simply represent the terminus of the path that party has been on from simultaneously catering to big businesses, corporate greed, knee jerk fiscal libertarians, selfish baby boomers who got theirs and don’t want to pay it forward, racism, sexism, and the intolerance of the religious right, since the 1980s. I really think it’s just moving towards its logical conclusion in this case.
September 30, 2013 — 9:12 PM
MomDuckie says:
Give the man a mic & put him live like a hacker takeover! Fucking brilliant! I agree wholeheartedly!!!!
September 30, 2013 — 9:14 PM
Katrina Monroe says:
I think the point here is that every politically motivated person in and around the government has an agenda. It becomes a HUGE PROBLEM when that agenda steps on the people who rely on the government to speak for them – i.e., the underprivileged, minorities, working poor, WOMEN, SINGLE MOTHERS, the list goes on… The potential shut down is a reminder that their way is more important than the general well-being of the country’s citizens.
Chuck’s right. The government IS broken. What I’m fucking terrified of is the fact that we may be too divided as a country to fix it. The bigger they are, the harder they fall…
September 30, 2013 — 9:16 PM
Tee Morris says:
God bless you, Chuck Wendig.
Think we might look back on this and say ‘You know, Aaron Sorkin called it in Season One of THE NEWSROOM?
September 30, 2013 — 9:20 PM
TJ Jansen says:
It’s strange that while much of what you say I can agree with, as I’m married to a teacher, the solid points get washed out with the same kind of hate you accuse the other side of. I’m not with the Tea Party, but I don’t see how a stance of, “if you are totally broke stop spending money” is racist. I don’t. Fundamentally, their stance is spend less than you make and take responsibility for yourself. How is that classist? Five minus 30 billion is a losing equation my first grader understands. Strange so many grown ups don’t see an issue…
September 30, 2013 — 9:29 PM
terribleminds says:
“Fundamentally, their stance is spend less than you make and take responsibility for yourself. How is that classist?”
Because if your cost of living outweighs the money you can make, it’s very, very hard to spend less than you make and survive. To speak nothing of this so-called “responsibility.”
That assertion works in a perfect world, but given that we live in a very imperfect one, it feels troublingly naive. It assumes — and here’s the classism — that we’re all on the same playing field and jeez, why don’t you slackers just go get a job, gosh, quit complaining and hunker down and something-something pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps except OHHH right you need education to do that and we just gutted education and — ooh, yikes, we stacked the deck against you, but we’re not going to admit that OUT LOUD and instead we’re going to keep saying SPEND LESS BE RESPONSIBLE YOU STUPID POOR PEOPLE YOU’RE POOR BECAUSE IT’S YOUR OWN FAULT when that is not necessarily the case.
September 30, 2013 — 9:36 PM
TJ Jansen says:
As a guy who grew up in a field with little in the way of advantage, I know for a fact we don’t have an “even playing field”. Almost everyone I grew up with still lives in that hole. You belittle the “bootstraps” stories, as if the only way to success is for government to do all the hard stuff for me. I worked my butt off. I’ve had a job since I was 8. I studied and got a scholarship despite a school system geared toward making farmers, then worked three jobs in college so I could pay for the rest. Don’t give me your elitist “we must defend the poor” garbage…I am the poor. It drives me nuts when people tell me the reason they are where they are is someone else’s fault. Naive my ass. Your road may be harder than mine. That’s life. It’s not the governments job to solve all my problems for me. The governments job is to make it possible to solve them myself.
September 30, 2013 — 10:09 PM
Laura Roach Dragon says:
You leave out gifts you may have that others don’t. Talent, health, energy, intelligence, ambition, and luck. There are scammers of course, but con men in the upper reaches steal much more and are admired and feted for it.
September 30, 2013 — 10:17 PM
terribleminds says:
“The governments job [sic] is to make it possible to solve them myself.”
And that’s not happening anymore. Because the game is being rigged.
Even if you don’t believe the government should endeavor to help the poor — it’s a whole other thing entirely to rig the game *against* them. Or, frankly, against the middle class, which is happening, too.
That education stuff I’m talking about? That’s rigging the game.
— c.
September 30, 2013 — 10:25 PM
TJ Jansen says:
So…In the Wendig Democracy, how do you continue to pay 5 billion while making 3 billion and avoid bankruptcy? Because that is where we are swiftly heading.
September 30, 2013 — 10:35 PM
Gareth Skarka says:
If you’ve worked since you were 8, worked 3 jobs, etc — then why are you still poor?
Because you’ve been sold a bill of goods. You’re poor. So am I. Here’s the lie: That we can bootstrap out of poverty. It doesn’t happen — and the ones who sell that fiction are the rich bastards who get folks like you to defend their right to their inheritances, all because they tell you that it’s in your best interests because you might have one someday.
The game is rigged.
Check any data on social mobility (moving from lower to middle class or upper class), world-wide, over the past 50 years. The US is near the bottom. This is not by accident.
The Owners get their way by convincing the poor that we’re all just temporarily-down-on-our-luck millionaires, and that better times are coming, if we just nose-to-the-grindstone, work ourselves to death, do what we’re told and don’t ask to many questions.
Pretty much the same scam the Church has been running for about 2000 years, come to think of it.
September 30, 2013 — 10:36 PM
TJ Jansen says:
For clarity, I came from nothing but do quite well for myself now. It wasn’t easy, but I got there. I am that non-existent class mover.
September 30, 2013 — 10:43 PM
smithster says:
Agreed. Bootstrapping your way out of poverty assumes the economy will always be expanding, giving each new person new opportunities. If the economy doesn’t expand and opportunities disappear, then someone further up the ladder has to fall for someone further down to go up. And sometimes we all just fall, as happened in 2008. Well, unless you were part of the 1%.
And if you’re going to argue austerity measures are the best way to starve yourself out of a recession, take a long, hard look at Greece before you do.
September 30, 2013 — 10:51 PM
Charlotte Grubbs (@literary_lottie) says:
Or, even closer to home than Greece, check out where austerity policies have gotten Britain:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2012/12/austerity-economics-doesnt-work.html
October 1, 2013 — 12:15 AM
JC Piech (@JCPiech) says:
Absolutely right, the game is rigged! Capitalism would cease to work if everyone ‘pulled themselves up by the bootstraps’ – it relies on there being many, many people at the bottom. And anyone who takes full credit for their social climbing is mistaken in thinking it was all down to their sheer hard work. They are climbing on the backs of those they want to escape from – every time they buy food from the supermarket, use their iphones or drive their cars, they are benefiting from the work of the low waged. Who do you think produces all these things? It ain’t rich people! Want to be a real self-made man? Start growing your own food and making your own mobile phones…
That’s why I hate the ‘boot strap’ brigade. They’ve simply internalised the lies feed to them – the ‘we can all be rich if we work hard’ mantra – and blame people below them for their own poverty.
October 1, 2013 — 7:23 AM
Charlotte Grubbs (@literary_lottie) says:
“It’s not the governments job to solve all my problems for me. The governments job is to make it possible to solve them myself.”
And that’s not happening anymore.
May I ask, how old are you and when was it that you first started out working as an adult? Because you seem to be assuming that the job market is essentially the same now as it was back then.
I assure you this is not the case.
I graduated college in 2012. I went to one of the top private universities in the country. My resume and skillset are extensive. And I cannot get a full time, benefits-providing job to save my life.
The vast majority of jobs being created in this economy are part-time jobs with low wages and no benefits. Jobs that don’t make use of a higher degree, jobs that don’t have room for advancement. Jobs that are not possible to fully support yourself or – God forbid you have one – a family on. Of the two dozen friends from college I keep in touch with, one – ONE – has a full time job. The rest of us scrape by with part-time work and temping, either living with our parents or financially relying on our parents. Some of us are lucky enough to get year-long contract work, but once that year is up were back at square one.
You had three jobs at one point? Hell. We’re lucky if we can get ONE.
And don’t even get me started on student debt. I avoided that millstone with a scholarship and having parents prescient enough to start saving for college as soon as I was born, but most students graduating these days are tens of thousands – if not hundreds of thousands – of dollars in debt either to the US government or to the even more predatory private banks.
And, faced with being unable to get a full-time job, many recent graduates are opting to go back to school for advanced degrees – becoming even more mired in debt and still with no guarantee that there will be a job for them on the other side.
Bootstraps aren’t enough anymore.
One of my best friends grew up in the Bronx on welfare. She was smart – the smartest person I know – and ambitious. She worked hard and earned a merit-based scholarship to an elite Manhattan prep school. She was courted by Harvard and Yale, but chose a third school because they were willing to help her out financially. Even so, she’s still owes tens of thousands of dollars in student loans, because unlike me and most of my friends she had nobody in her family who could help her pay for school. Now, she has a master’s degree in biomedical engineering from Cornell.
And she still can’t get a full-time job with benefits. Just contract work. Part-time contract work.
And part-time contract work won’t pay for those tens of thousands of dollars of students loans.
THAT’s your modern-day bootstrap story.
I appreciate the fact that you worked hard and were able to make something of yourself. All I’m asking – all anybody in my generation is asking – is that we are allowed the same opportunities that you had.
September 30, 2013 — 11:37 PM
Laura Roach Dragon says:
Bravo. Hope you find what you ask.
September 30, 2013 — 11:45 PM
TJ Jansen says:
I graduated in 2001 with a degree in Biology. I couldn’t get a job using my degree, so I went to work at Enterprise rent-a-car, working 60 hrs a week. I applied for other jobs for three years until I finally got a better one. I understand it’s hard. Even with 2 incomes, my wife and I spent 10 years with crummy apartments and old cars, no vacations and not eating out in order to pay off loans. The biggest challenge I see with “middle class” kids who had parents pay for school is they expect the same standard of living at 22 as their parents have at 55, ignoring the 30 years it took them to get it. That might not be your situation, but I see it a lot.
October 1, 2013 — 3:02 PM
Ell Minn says:
I, too, graduated in 2012 – although this has not necessarily been my experience. Many of my friends – all of whom went to the same relatively well-regarded public university that I attended – are employed full-time with benefits. It took some longer than others to get here, but here we are nonetheless.
I found that some creativity in the types of jobs that you apply for certainly helped. I’m currently working in a wildly different direction than I anticipated my English degree would take me; although it isn’t necessarily my dream job, it certainly pays the bills. And that’s okay, for now.
While I agree that “bootstrapping” may be a thing of the past, I think a large amount of the aforementioned career-oriented creativity coupled with a similar “whatever it takes” mentality will pay dividends for those of us who were fortunate to complete a bachelor’s degree (and I’m nothing close to debt-free, mind you).
I’m worried about those who weren’t as fortunate.
October 1, 2013 — 5:28 PM
Laura Roach Dragon says:
Not hate. Anger. Appropriate anger IMHO.
September 30, 2013 — 9:55 PM
jakebible says:
Chuck, you are 100% correct. Might I add that the destruction of public education not only keeps those that might vote against the Tea Party from having a voice, it also keeps those that do vote for the Tea Party ignorant. That way they can never understand the lies and misdirection. “What do you mean mirrors ain’t supposed to be smokey? That’s crazy talk! You’re a witch!”. They want an ignorant population. Simple. Easier to control. Easier to sway. Easier to get to, um, let’s say…buy shit. Whether that shit is consumer goods that aren’t needed or rhetoric that is completely based in fantasy. An ignorant population will buy it. It’s not hard to see where they are getting their political model for this. Can you guess? No, no, folks, not Rome. That’s too easy to pick out and pick apart. The model they are trying to create is called serfdom. Think share cropping, but without the benefits package. Seriously. Have a read here, folks http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Serfdom.html
Short and simplified, but easy to understand. Trickle down economics much? 1% holds 95% of the wealth? Yeah, that. Say hello to the new boos, same as the old 12th century boss. Le sigh.
September 30, 2013 — 9:29 PM
thatcalamity says:
As a Canadian, I can’t speak to how your government works aside from an anecdote about how I can’t help but watch in a kind of shocked horror that things like this happen while there’s still rallying shouts of ‘Freedom!’. We’re not perfect, we’ve got a leader who is killing off the public service and scientific community quietly, but so far the conservatives know better than to touch health care or gay rights.
So far.
I wish you and yours all the best, I really do.
September 30, 2013 — 9:42 PM
greg says:
Thank you man… totally on target… if only we could shut their mind- numbing BS down by just playing the same hold our breath till we turn blue tactics….
September 30, 2013 — 9:43 PM
Stephanie Lormand says:
I live in North Carolina.
I could write for days about all the ways that sentence now summarizes several years of truly shameful legislative behavior. For example, my state has fallen head-over-backseat-sex-love with fracking. Our newly reconstituted Mining and Energy Commission has been populated with members that are politically/industrially objective, and scientific experts.
Or not– the chairman of the Commission is George Howard– co-founder and CEO of Restoration Systems, a company that makes money on cleaning up nasty environmental whoops.
September 30, 2013 — 9:45 PM
terribleminds says:
Yeah, I lived in NC for 7-8 years, and I hear you.
Lot of “gaming the system” going on, it seems.
September 30, 2013 — 9:46 PM
steve christopher says:
“I pledge allegiance to the United Corporations of America…”
September 30, 2013 — 9:47 PM
Laura Roach Dragon says:
Ouch. So true.
September 30, 2013 — 9:52 PM
Liz Blocker (@lizblocker) says:
I would stand up and cheer, except that I’m so angry I’m spitting, so the cheer can’t come out past the wads of phlegm.
I appreciate your rant – I LOVE your rant – but I am so above and beyond furious at our national “government” that I can’t think about much else. And no, I’m not an anarchist. I just think that any elected body that is so mired in ludicrous partisan politics and gimmicky campaigns (Ted Cruz being just one excellent example) that it cannot for its life pass a single law does not deserve to called a government.
It’s showmanship, on both sides. It’s absurd. And the people who are going to have to eat the shit they produce are the poor and the middle class. As you point out.
So yes, I think rants are in order.
September 30, 2013 — 9:53 PM
Heather Milne Johnson says:
I guess I’ll get to sleep in tomorrow. Doesn’t look like I’m going to work because my place of work will be shut down. And thank you for expressing the anger I feel that’s gnawing my guts apart.
September 30, 2013 — 9:53 PM
traciemcbride says:
Filling up the jails? I hadn’t even thought of that. My first impression was, “Gut education, then all those uneducated people will be forced to accept subsistence wages and appalling work conditions in exchange for their unskilled labour, working for…ooh, look, companies owned by those Tea Party People!”
(Says a New Zealand-born, Australia-residing reader who probably should not be weighing in on a thread about American politics.)
September 30, 2013 — 9:55 PM
Laura Roach Dragon says:
I didn’t see the jail piece coming either. And I should have. I’m from New Orleans and Louisiana has been called the prison capital of the world.
September 30, 2013 — 10:06 PM
smithster says:
Yup, highest per capita incarcerated population among Western democracies, and the jails are privately run. Not hard to do that math now is it? lolsigh.
September 30, 2013 — 10:56 PM
Gareth Skarka says:
“(This will be doubly genius if Pennsylvania starts to eventually do the Tea Party lean toward privatized prisons. Haven’t gone that way yet, far as I can tell.)”
They started to — with juvenile detention being operated privately, but they got greedy, and got caught literally selling kids to private prisons:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal
September 30, 2013 — 10:18 PM
Larry B. Killian says:
I hate Tea Baggers with a passion and your rant hit it right on the nose. These guys are making what couldhave been a good ccouple terms for a balanced Democratic president a nightmare with the most ineffective Congress/Senate ever because of their bullshit games. How many times have they tries to repeal the affordable heathcare reform act? Hell most of those dumbasses can’t count that high I bet.
September 30, 2013 — 10:20 PM
smithster says:
::sigh:: yup. I know. I might only disagree on one thing in that I feel almost all of this is short-term-goal related. Like the charter schools in Philly – I think that’s what the aim was. Money, now, before they move on to their position on the board of whatever lobbyist’s money they took while they were in office. You don’t have to worry about re-election if there’s no wait period for working for whoever paid for your hotel bills and hookers while you were in office.
September 30, 2013 — 10:45 PM
yellehughes says:
Prisons here in Ohio have already begun privatization. Lake Erie facility was sold to a private company and it was a disaster.
September 30, 2013 — 10:54 PM
Heidi Loney (@HeidiLoney) says:
Chuck, I love you. Have you thought about writing for Jon Stewart? You are hi-larious!
September 30, 2013 — 11:16 PM
aileenmiles says:
Excellent rant!
I also note that PA has plenty of money to build new prisons while Corbett starves the school system. I don’t think it’s a coincidence.
September 30, 2013 — 11:31 PM
Rae Leggett says:
Well, I’ve enjoyed your writing, and your blog. But given your expressed contempt for me, my family, my politics and probably my religion, I can’t in good conscience continue to traffic this blog, and needless to say finish reading your books. That’s too bad.I guess we can call it an amicable separation, on my part at least.
Be well.
September 30, 2013 — 11:35 PM
Charlotte Grubbs (@literary_lottie) says:
Lordy lordy. PA may be even more fucked up than Georgia, and that’s saying something. We’ve had a big push for chartered schools here, coupled with slashing school budgets, defunding the Hope Scholarship (state college scholarships for underprivileged kids) and resisting implementing the Common Core because the federal government telling us what to teach is totes a Communist plot, OBVIOUSLY. The very conservative state government has also attempted to take control of the Atlanta-comprising Fulton County government on more than one occasion, making it so that the budget for Fulton County including school funding must be approved by the state legislature – which, I didn’t think you could do, legally? I’m not sure they care.
On the other hand, the state’s trying to reform the juvenile justice system so that kids are no longer incarcerated for truancy, curfew breaking or running away, and implementing a more social-services-based approach to teen homelessness. Mostly because country courts pointed out that, shockingly enough, locking up kids for running away from home is not the *best* approach to preventing repeat offenses and actually, it costs the state more to lock the kids up than it does to pay for rehabilitation programs and social services.
As for our federal government – I’ve just been boggling at my Twitter feed for the past week. The most mindfuck moment was when the House resurrected the dead, buried-decomposing corpse of the Blunt Amendment to attach to the CR bill. Because clearly not letting ladies have access to birth control is the most important factor for a recovering economy. CLEARLY.
I’m pretty sure this is the game plan for the Tea Party:
1) Make education unaffordable to all but the richest in the country.
2) Prevent economic advancement by only creating part-time, low-paying wage work.
3) Limit reproductive rights for women, leading to a boom population of undereducated, underprivileged children that will grow up to assume all those unskilled, low-wage jobs that have no benefits and operate under zero safety measures or accountability to health and human rights. If a cog wears out, it can be easily replaced with another worker drone. Just like John Galt would have wanted it.
4) Privatize prisons so that those worn out cogs can at least still make money for their corporate overlords.
5) Profit!
6) Hunger Games
Written EXACTLY like that.
October 1, 2013 — 12:08 AM
TymberDalton says:
Until Americans rebel and demand laws removing ALL private interest and PAC money from the electoral process, ban political “parties” (yeah, they’re partying on OUR backs, all right), and demand constitutional amendments prohibiting Congress from getting paychecks if they don’t do their jobs, nothing will change.
I keep hearing Republicans saying on TV, “Oh, Americans want Obamacare repealed.”
Bullshit. People who understand it and who need it because, like me, they either can’t afford outrageous health insurance costs and/or have pre-existing conditions and can’t get healthcare, we WANT it!!!
I don’t want “free” healthcare. I want healthcare I can fucking afford without having to go into bankruptcy. And I want Congress to quit fucking us over with their goddamned games.
I say we vote every last fucking one of them out, regardless of political affiliation, next time they’re up for re-election. They obviously don’t give a shit about the job they’re supposed to be doing, they’re too busy worrying about what people in their “party” will think.
Fuck the political parties. Work for the goddamned PEOPLE, not the parties or the donor or the PACs or the businesses paying out the wazoo to buy politicians.
October 1, 2013 — 12:23 AM
mollyblgh says:
Chuck’s right.
I am as averse to conspiracy theories as most people are, but the destruction of the Philadelphia schools is not an accidental result of ignorance and incompetence, and it is not short-term thinking.
It’s planned.
“On Monday, wealthy donors interested in the future of public education will gather for a two-day conference at the Union League: “All of the Above: How Donors can Expand a City’s Great Schools.” Attendance is restricted to those who make $50,000 in charitable donations per year.” http://citypaper.net/article.php?Wealthy-donors-move-schools-decision-making-behind-closed-doors-16332
The press is not allowed to attend.
Philadelphia is only a small-scale example of what the Tea Partiers want to do nationally and globally.
I remember back in the’80s, when the free marketeers who drove us into the current recession were beginning to take over in the corporate world, my father (who was a fairly conservative Republican businessman) saying “Whatever happened to the common good?”
What, indeed.
October 1, 2013 — 12:24 AM
mollyblgh says:
P.S. Have fun in Australia. 🙂
October 1, 2013 — 12:27 AM
Davida Chazan says:
But you didn’t get to the end of the story. How if they continue to fool people and take the White House, they’ll end up doing things like prosecuting women for using birth control (or worse), or maybe even imprisoning the poor. And when the prisons are too overrun with the poor, they’ll reinstate slavery, saying “we abolished it, we can bring it back.”
October 1, 2013 — 12:50 AM
LRSmith says:
OK…where to begin. I feel like I first need to say that I am a registered Independent. I have voted for both Democrats and Republicans, not to mention an Independent once in a blue moon. I vote the person, not the party.
Concerning the rant by the author…I was kind of interested in what you had to say, at first. But then you started with the “foul language” and you lost me. I have always felt that you should be able to get your point across without swearing because once that starts? You loose most of your audience. Just my opinion.
I didn’t vote for Obama, I just don’t like him. I think that he wouldn’t be having the problems he is having (budget, Obama-care) if he had just learned the art of compromise. I heard something while watching CNN tonight. When Clinton was in office and they had the government shut-down problem, he talked with the House Leader at least once a day, to try and solve the problem. Obama hadn’t talked to the House Leader in a week before today! Why wasn’t he talking to him every day to try and thrash out a deal? He won’t compromise one little bit…especially when it comes to The Affordable Care Act!
Now here is my rant concerning the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (Obama-care). I work two part-time jobs because after loosing the job I was at for 22 years, I couldn’t find full-time work. I considered myself lucky that one of my part-time jobs offered health insurance to their part-time employees. I was just informed this week that my insurance will end December 31, 2013 because “it does not meet the minimum coverage requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”.
I thought the whole idea behind the “Affordable Care Act” was to help the uninsured and uninsurable? I have health insurance (at least until the end of the year) and it was affordable, only $48 per month. It was adequate for what I needed and if I had any out-of-pocket expenses, I paid them (not the government). Now? I am going to have to deal with all sorts of government red tape to get insurance that I can’t afford. I am dreading all the forms I will have to fill out, people I will have to talk to, etc to prove that I am too poor to afford the state plans and get the “discounted rate” that I’ve read about. Even then, I’m not too optimistic that it will be something that I can afford.
I am one of those “working poor” that is just one paycheck away from being homeless and just may become that, trying to pay for insurance that the government is demanding I have…it would appear that I have Obama to thank for that. Just my opinion.
October 1, 2013 — 12:55 AM
mollyblgh says:
You may just end up with better health insurance at a lower cost than you have now. The government may be shut down, but the health insurance marketplace is open, as of today. Check it out. https://www.healthcare.gov/
October 1, 2013 — 8:18 AM
Kay Camden says:
“But then you started with the “foul language” and you lost me.”
You must not fucking come here often.
October 1, 2013 — 11:07 AM
Alex says:
Yes, I thought that too. And, err, the title of this piece includes the word “ponyfucker”. Subtle hint.
October 1, 2013 — 11:14 AM
Charlotte Grubbs (@literary_lottie) says:
“Concerning the rant by the author…I was kind of interested in what you had to say, at first. But then you started with the “foul language” and you lost me. I have always felt that you should be able to get your point across without swearing because once that starts? You loose most of your audience.”
You must be new here.
And I as far as I can see, it hasn’t lost Chuck much of an audience thus far.
October 1, 2013 — 11:48 PM
Tina Goodman says:
I thought the Tea Party was about governing according to the U.S. Constitution. It sounds like I’ve been duped.
October 1, 2013 — 12:57 AM
Nikkiwi says:
What pisses me off about this whole shutdown thing is that those responsible for the situation still collect thier paychecks while everyone else lower down the heirarchy goes without. I’ll bet they wouldn’t have been so happy to pile the shit on if they had to push the cart themselves
October 1, 2013 — 1:39 AM
Garrett Robinson says:
Unfortunately, a salary loss probably wouldn’t have made much of a difference to them. The salary that most—not all, but most—congress members get is proportionately tiny to the amount of money they make through other means—many of them corrupt.
October 1, 2013 — 11:11 AM
Lindy Moone says:
You are my fucking hero. That is all.
October 1, 2013 — 2:09 AM
Wickedjulia says:
Brilliant
October 1, 2013 — 3:23 AM
jjtonerJJ Toner says:
Speaking from the sidelines (i.e. Irealnd, where we are in the middle of a severe austerity program) this is all seriously scary. Our broken economy and the austerity that followed, coupled with the global recession, have done terrible damage here. But I think people here (and everywhere around the world) have no notion of the tsunami that will hit us all when the US economy collapses, as it surely will.
October 1, 2013 — 4:27 AM
Talle says:
That’s what frightens me most. America’s fuckery will have repercussions worldwide, and the sign-holders with the misspelled and ill-thought-out placards supporting these evil people in the House do not even begin to grasp that.
October 2, 2013 — 8:04 AM
Alex says:
I think this is an excellent, timely, and erudite commentary on an issue which is actually affecting not just America, but the global economy. I sometimes wonder how the average, decent, honest and hard-working American thinks their country is viewed from another nation. Everything I see from over here in Scotland suggests America is either broken, or very nearly at that point. I see the big corporations trying to insert their nebulous claws into every area of your nation (and, by proxy, everywhere else), and it saddens me. I remember when I was growing up, America was the hero, it was the nation most of the world looked up to. Now, however, I think the world is beginning to wonder where things went wrong, and where to turn next.
And for those who moan about politics being discussed here – when IS the right time to talk about these things, if not when you are impassioned by developments in your country? Too often people simply roll over and allow themselves to whine and moan after the event – when they could have done something before it was too late. America, and the world, needs more of this debate.
Again, thanks for crafting this piece – it’s the first I’ve commented on, despite having followed this site for some time.
October 1, 2013 — 4:38 AM
Lyra Marlowe says:
Brilliant! The only piece you left out was gerrymandering. GOP leaders used their positions in states to make nice safe Republican districts for themselves. Now they’re surprised when Tea-Party types way to the right of them are running for those nice safe seats. Where it used to take a nice moderate Republican to win, back where there were Democratic votes to be counter-balanced, now the challengers push ever further to the right and they are scrabbling to deal. It would be hilarious to see them hoist, as it were, if it weren’t so fucking tragic for the whole damn country.
October 1, 2013 — 6:26 AM
Andy Decker says:
And I am so glad the DNC doesn’t gerrymander to make nice, safe Democratic districts for themselves. Remember ‘Red Fish / Blue Fish’? That wonderful Seuss book? Well, today we have ‘Red State / Blue State’. Sound familiar? That slogan has marketing and PR written all over it. Maybe we’re at a place in time where out political leanings are little more than brand loyalty. My vote it we’re dealing with two rotten groups of some animals are more equal than others. Coke and Pepsi: they’re both brown, they contain caffeine and carbonation, and a few other secret ingredients may make a nickel’s worth of difference. But back in the lab, they are far more alike than anyone wants to admit. And, just one more thought – do we really think the politicians will argue with friends and family about us? Will one of them end up to near-hating a brother-senator arguing about you?
October 1, 2013 — 3:55 PM
Gareth Skarka says:
Again with the false equivalence. Please, check the facts. The Republican state legislature’s gerrymandering of their districts occurred at an UNPRECENDENTED level. Yes, both parties gerrymandered in the past — but nothing at all close to the scale, nationally-concerted effort, and degree to what occurred after the 2010 census.
It’s not both parties. It’s ONE. Stop peddling the false equivalence that gives them cover.
October 1, 2013 — 4:27 PM
Andy Decker says:
Gareth – I’m not peddling false equivalence. At least I wasn’t trying to and I apologize if it sounded like that. Gerrymandering depends on who is in control when the census comes back. And, both parties do it. It’s not right when either party does it (two wrongs and all that). I’m not excusing anyone of any wrong doing simply because they have a ‘D’ or an ‘R’ after their name. Here’s another example of what I’m trying to explain. I remember way back when, when Bush II did the lunge for the warrantless wiretapping. And from what I know the NSA ‘stuff’ did start in his administration (probably earlier but us good citizens don’t need to know that). Many were angry at that time, and justly so. So now, with a new administration, we discover the NSA ‘stuff’ has grown exponentially into unknown and, for my two cents, frightening levels. Now again with the brand loyalty. A good number of people are content to say things like, ‘It’s ok because my guy is doing it.’ A number of other people are always quick to say, ‘The other guy did it first, so it’s ok when my guy does it.’ Can we at least queue the Pete Townsend, ‘Meet the old boss, same as the new boss.’? We all need to check ourselves once in a while and think about what we’re willing to excuse simply because the party in power is the one we like. That’s all I’m saying and I’ll shut up now.
October 1, 2013 — 9:15 PM
aileenmiles says:
Yes, both parties do it, but Rs have gone way further this time around just as they did with the record number of Senate filibusters.
The gerrymandering is then coupled with “voter ID” laws and changes to polling hours and places in the remaining Democratic districts (look at what was going on in Ohio during the run-up to the 2012 elections) to keep Ds from the polls because the Rs can’t win honestly.
How else do D congressional candidates get ~1.5 million more votes than R candidates and still leave the House R control?
October 2, 2013 — 8:01 AM
Pee Dee says:
TP3:
1. Incinerate those you hate.
2. Incarcerate those who disagree with you.
3. Enslave the rest.
The Godwin Fallacy (that references to Naziism automatically lose the argument is, of course, nonsense that only weak-minded parrots take seriously). There are some parallels, and Godwin be fucked.
America has lost a lot of international respect, a lot of goodwill, and the sense of awe that was prevalent in the 50s and 60s.
You didn’t win the Cold War; Russia and China are rising while your infrastructure is aging and crumbling. I tend to think the only realistic way forward is to drastically reduce your war chest and rely on your allies to keep you safe, while you build and rebuild the things that made your country great. I think the greatness is gone and won’t come back for a few centuries, but with the help of those countries who like yours, you can build back some capacity and adequacy. I very much doubt this will happen.
October 1, 2013 — 6:37 AM
Tina Goodman says:
We can’t rely on our “allies” to keep us safe. Nobody likes us that much, except Israel since we are their only friend. Countries tend to side with whichever countries benefit them the most, it’s politics.
October 2, 2013 — 3:12 AM