25 Things You Should Know About Worldbuilding

Worldbuilding is one of those topics that bakes my noodle every time my brain chooses to dwell on it. I have a whole bucket full of opinions, many of them in stark disagreement with one another. So, this list below should never at any time be taken as “25 Exhaustive Universal Truths About Worldbuilding,” but rather be regarded as, “25 Things Chuck Wendig Thinks About Worldbuilding At This Exact Moment In Time, Oh, Wait, Some Of Them Just Changed.”

Kay? Kay.

Let’s chat.

1. What We Mean When We Say “Worldbuilding”

We’re talking about the revelation of your storyworld and its details through the story itself. It’s easy to think this means “setting,” but that’s way too simple — worldbuilding covers everything and anything inside that world. Money, clothing, territorial boundaries, tribal customs, building materials, imports and exports, transportation, sex, food, the various types of monkeys people possess, whether the world does or does not contain Satanic “twerking” rites.

2. The World Serves The Story, The Story Does Not Serve The World

My opinion: you build a world to serve the story or stories you want to tell; you do not tell a story that is slave to the worldbuilding. Story comes first. Worldbuilding supports the story. Meaning, you must look at the components of the story you hope to tell: it’s got these characters, it’s about this idea, it makes a particular argument, and from there you start to see that the world can organically accommodate and reflect those things. Doing the opposite — leading with the worldbuilding — is what you’d do if you were writing a roleplaying game which has to tell all kinds of stories, not just yours. If you put the cart before the horse the horse is gonna headbutt the cart and knock it over and then you’re all, WAIT NO MY CABBAGES then we laugh at you.

3. Put Differently, You’re Not Writing A Fucking Encyclopedia

If you prioritize worldbuilding, you’re probably going to end up with like, seven different versions of the D&D Monster Manual but no actual novel. Which, again, is super-awesome if you’re writing a roleplaying game, but less awesome if your goal is to write a more static and ego-driven story. Worldbuilding can be a giant time sink and, worse, a distraction that can make you feel productive while also keeping you from lashing your body to the mast of your novel, comic, or film — which, again, is more likely your purpose.

4. Okay, Wait, You Might Be Writing An Encyclopedia

But then again, that’s not to say you’ll find zero value in writing a storyworld bible for the tale at hand. If you’re writing a three-book epic fantasy, and each book is gonna be 150,000 words a pop or more, you may want to find a comfort level with the details big and small of the world about which you’re writing — in certain modes of fantasy, the world is itself a character, and a focused world bible will help you reflect that. Just the same, you’re still better off ensuring that what goes into the story bible reflects the characters and themes you plan to work with, and it’s probably also wise to get some of those story details down in your notes before you hunker down and start writing the bible for Middle Earth II: Shirelectric Hobbaloo. Here’s one test: if you’ve spent a year writing a 400-page story bible (one you could use to break the neck of a walrus) and yet you still haven’t put a single sentence down on your novel, you might be committing too much energy in the wrong direction.

5. Variant Approach: Ninja Genesis

Man, now I have a great idea for a Phil Collins cover band. *dons ninja gear, starts singing Sh-sh-shuriken, sung to the tune of Sussudio* WAIT YOU’RE STILL HERE okay I’ll worry about that later. If you’re lazy (like me!) and don’t feel like you can commit to writing a glacier-sized world bible, hey, you know what? Build it as you go. As you write, introduce details relevant to the story, the plot, the characters, the theme, and to the chapter at hand. This’ll probably require work on the back-end — no, not proctology, though perhaps it’s not unlike proctology, because you’ll have to go back on the second draft and root around and make everything work together instead of the random slapdash worldbuilding you just did. The pro: this is organic and works for lazy people (like me!). The con: more work after the fact, and may not give you a full sense of the world going into the story. Probably better for stories that require lighter worldbuilding, like those based off of our existing world.

6. The Pig In A Purse

Here’s some probably-really-bad and likely-untrue advice: give the audience only those details they need to know to understand the story. Now, it’s worth highlighting what I mean by “story” — story, for me, is not the same as plot. Story is the apple, plot is the arrow through it. Plot is a sequence of events as revealed to the reader, but story is all the stuff in and around that. Mood is a function of story, so when I say to include those worldbuilding elements that are necessary to move the story forward, I don’t merely mean the plot. I mean, hey, it’s totally okay to include a detail that is relevant to advancing a particular mood of gloom, or a theme of “man’s inhumanity to mermaids” or whatever. The problem is when the worldbuilding overwhelms — read: “smothers” — the story with needless details. I don’t need you to describe every family crest, guild sigil, hairstyle, nipple clamp, or blade of grass in the world. (Wait, on second thought: tell me more about these nipple clamps.) This is bad advice, probably, because a lot of fantasy storytelling is very much this: chapter after chapter of rich, robust, wormy worldbuilding loam. Fertile dirt, maybe, but too fetishistic and not necessary to move the audience forward in that space. And moving them forward is, I suspect, the goal.

7. Function Beyond Plot

This bears further reiterating: worldbuilding supports story, not just plot. Which means that your worldbuilding supports mood, theme, conflict, character, culture, setting. It doesn’t have to move only the sequence of events further. The details of the world you’ve created can and should engage with the whole narrative, not just action and event.

8. Action And Dialogue Above Description And Exposition

That being said, what’s true for other stories is true with a story featuring thick, delicious worldbuilding — you’re better off conveying the details of that world through action and dialogue than through giant boulders of description and exposition dropped on your readers from a vertiginous height. I get points for using “vertiginous,” right? Fellas? Ladies? Anybody?

9. A Rich Tapestry Or An Unrolled Tube Of Plain White Toilet Paper?

A lot of worldbuilding is dull as a hammer, as complex as a meaty slap to the face. This is fine for certain modes of storytelling (and a powerful story will set aside any concerns over monochromatic worldbuilding), but in general, if you’re gonna build a world, you’re best introducing some measure of nuance into it. We’ve been conditioned, perhaps, by the news and other forces (school, parents, bad fantasy novels) that everything is black and white, good and evil, that all things are easily slotted into their compartments. Example: the Middle East. Our politicians, our news media, our pop culture portray the Middle East like, “Okay, those are the good guys, those are the bad guys, ta-da, yay, simplistic world-view confirmed,” but if you spend more than five minutes looking into it, you realize the picture looks more like this. Certainly some stories are better off relying on the good versus evil paradigm, but generally, they dominate. More interesting (to me, if not to you) are those stories that are drawn from complexity and nuance rather than from easily predictable, simplistic strokes.

10. The Nature Of “Write What You Know”

Write What You Know is one of those pieces of writing advice that inspires glorious epiphany and pants-pooping rage in equal measure. Genre fiction tends to be where folks hit their heads against it in frustration: “Well, how can I write about murder scenes, alien apocalypses, or humping a sexy elf? I’VE ONLY DONE TWO OUT OF THE THREE. And the third, I was really drunk on monkey schnapps.” With worldbuilding, the question becomes: how can this advice hold up? The easy answer is: it doesn’t. It can come into the writing of characters and situations, but worldbuilding, not so much. The more complicated answer is: you can still borrow from things you understand and translate them accordingly. Maybe you know local school politics or neighborhood hierarchy, and you know how both operate viciously, each an engine that runs on gossip and lies — psst, you can use that. Just give it a fantasy or space opera context, and boom. Alternately, you can borrow from culture, politics and history. Read some non-fiction about other places and different people. Again: translate. Use write what you know as a springboard to know more things, then gaze upon said things through the lens of the fantastic.

11. Remix Culture

We live in an era of remix culture. And reboot culture. Everything that’s not something entirely new either feels like a microwaved rehash or a remix of other stories — but believe me when I say, remixing with worldbuilding is perfectly acceptable. Hell, remixing can be fun. On my iPad I used DJ software to remix Kayne West’s “Black Skinhead” with the Thomas the Tank Engine theme and, pow, now it’s getting radio play in both Moldavia and Moldova. Point is to remix things that are different enough and interesting enough so that the result is something new and unseen — remixing can be magical alchemy or it can be as boring as pouring two different types of milk together in the same glass. (“My world is a remix of Tolkien and Robert Jordan” is far less interesting than, say, “I’m remixing Cherokee myth with Eastern European vampires and throwing in a hefty dash of Stephen King’s The Gunslinger.”) Don’t be lazy. Don’t be predictable. Use other ideas to create something new and uniquely yours.

12. Ew, Stereotypes

If you’re worldbuilding, don’t rely on stereotypes. Noble savages and white heroes and damsels-in-distress and people of a single race acting in a single way. No culture is monolithic, skin color does not determine demeanor or magical racial bonuses, men are not all one thing and women are not all another thing. Stereotypes are lazy at best, harmful at worst. They make Story Jesus karate a kitten and then post the pictures on Facebook that say “SEE WHAT YOU MADE ME DO.”

13. Your Heteronormative White Male Gaze

Carrying this conversation a little further: if you’re firmly ensconced in your mini-mansion sitting on top of Heteronormative White Dude Mountain, you should cast an extra-long look at any presuppositions in your worldbuilding and sniff for the acrid tang of privilege sprayed all over from your White Dude scent glands. The result of worldbuilding in genre fiction seem to skew strongly toward White Dudes, and this is frequently excused in some way  — “Well, in the Middle Ages, women were basically sexy goats and dudes were the shepherds and I’m just being authentic and something-something slaves and blah-blah-the-Moors–” Mmm, uh-uh, bzzt, wrongo. First: you don’t need to be “authentic” to history in genre fiction that does not use actual history. Second, history is a lot more nuanced than you think. Third, we know you’re just using that as an excuse, so just stop it. You’re embarrassing yourself. For shame. *shakes head*

14. Small Details Are Just As Important As Big Ones

It’s easy to get wrapped up in all the Big Epic Holy Fucksmuckers aspects of worldbuilding — all the weighty topics like RELIGION and POLITICS and THE DANCE MUSIC OF KINGS. But a lot of worldbuilding lives in little details. What they drink at different meals. How they wash their hands. How they treat their animals. What materials they use to construct their sex toys (“BEHOLD THE ORICHALCUM DONG”). These little details can connect to and reflect a larger cultural aspect without bludgeoning readers over the head and neck with weighty exposition.

15. Simple Interactions Pregnant With Worldbuilding Complexity

Just as small details matter, so do the small interactions of our characters. The way one shares her food. The way another addresses a superior. The way a third chooses to couple rectally with the tentacled yelly-beast of Vrall, and whether or not they cuddle afterward, and what that cuddling means culturally. Allow the world to be built through what your characters do and say.

16. Your World Must Be Active And Alive

Worldbuilding is not an encyclopedia for dead cultures and forgotten races. That element can be in there, sure (because, so cool) but this world is one that features actual characters doing actual things and affecting the world. Worldbuilding has a tendency to feel staid and monolithic: “Everybody does this because it’s the culture.” But that’s never really true in our world, is it? Look at it like this: the rest of the world sees America as this single-headed entity, but they also seem to recognize that Americans are not always representative of that entity. That’s the breakdown: the world is one way, but the people are allowed to be another. Because people are alive. They have free will and agency to confirm and deny different aspects of their culture.

17. “But It’s Cool, Shut Up” Is Not An Excuse

All aspects of your worldbuilding should justify themselves in some way. “BUT IT’S COOL I LIKE IT” is not enough. My experience with worldbuilding is that it yields no small surfeit of Really Awesome Ideas that, at the same time, Don’t Really Belong In The Story. “But this cult! They do awesome things! And they spray acid from their nipples in the name of their Dark Lordess, Areola the Aerosolized Acid Queen, and they have magic based on the configuration of moles and skin tags and–” And none of that belongs in the book. Doesn’t connect to characters, plot, theme, anything. Cut it. Save it for a time when you can use it meaningfully, not just because oooh preshus darling I loves the pretty peacock. *paws at the darling, mewls*

18. The Rules

Worldbuilding likes to offer “rules” — in particular, rules about the way This Certain Thing works, which might be magic, or some alien technology, or political ascension, or what happens when you fuck a minotaur while holding a pelican under the boughs of the whispering wank-wank tree. Rules can be critical in helping readers understand the nature of the world and, more importantly, how the stakes of the story in this world shake out. (More on a story’s stakes here.But (you know a ‘but’ had to be coming, right?), rules can also be woefully boring. They can be expository, obvious, and they can rob the story of mystery. You’re not writing a technical manual for HVAC repair. And yet, you also don’t want a world where everything is so unpredictable that it feels convenient and lazy. Here’s how to handle it: you should know the rules and conform to them. But you don’t need to spell them out to the audience. The audience is smart! The audience wants to work. Let them figure it out for themselves, like a puzzle.

19. Wait, I Need To Research My Made-Up World?

Tad Williams thinks so, and I happen to agree. Research trade routes. Economics. Religious persecution. Poetry. Guilds. Alchemy. Djinn. Leprechaun ranching. Medieval donkey shows. Knowing how real things work will inform how they work in your made-up fancy-land.

20. Imagine A World On The Edge Of Conflict

Conflict is the food that feeds the reader. Just as characters enter a story facing conflict, so too should the world in which they live. First, because it’s interesting. Second, because has any world ever been entirely without conflict? War! Famine! Plague! Facebook! Miley Cyrus’ soul-leeching hell-tongue! Conflict is good for your story, your characters, and your setting.

21. Everything Affects Everything Else

Behold the complexity intrinsic to worldbuilding. Everything pushes and pulls on everything else, often in interesting ways. Again, our world makes for good examples: think of how a technological development can change the world in a relatively short amount of time (printing press, electricity, the Internet, Robocop). Think of what happens when a critical resource (food, water, oil, coffee, hair pomade, black market llama squeezings) dries up. Small changes in an economic system can have huge results. A new farming practice can fix — or wreak havoc upon — the environment. Everything is tethered to everything else, and in this, you can find compelling worldbuilding as well as the interesting stories that grow out of it.

22. Subtextology

Characters can speak in subtext. So can the world. Not everything must be spoken or spelled out.

23. Preserving Mystery Is Vital

A fully-realized and known world is also a boring world. Mystery, alongside conflict, is another of those vital vittles that feeds the reader and keeps them hooked. Question marks are shaped like hooks for a reason, I say — so leave lots of questions. The best parts of any map are the ones that fade out and leave us with the dread note of HERE THERE BE DRAGONS. Preserve that uncertainty in your worldbuilding. Never pull back the curtain all the way. Always leave us hanging, waiting for you to reveal more, more, more.

24. Worldbuilding Versus Storytelling

Good worldbuilding does not automatically mean the same thing for the storytelling. I’ll leave you with this io9 article, which compares the worldbuilding of Star Wars: The Phantom Menace with Star Wars: A New Hope. One could make an argument that the worldbuilding in the prequel chapters is more robust and more detailed than what you’d find in the original trilogy. And one would hopefully also argue that this didn’t make for a better experience in any way, shape, or form and may have in fact robbed some of the narrative potency from that universe.

25. Construct Worlds Mapped After Your Own Heartsblood Spatter

Pro-tip: build worlds that you love. That interest you. Whose characters sing the song that drums in the deep dark labyrinthine chambers of the puzzle box you call a heart. If you don’t like it? If it doesn’t conjure themes that fascinate you, if it fails to play with images and ideas that appeal to you, the world will feel flat as a frog under an anvil. Get excited about world building! Embrace the mad genesis. Scream, let there be light, and then cackle, and pull the switch, and watch the storyworld of your dreams and nightmares glow bright and bold like a fucking Christmas tree on Jesus’ own front porch. I mean, jeez, if you don’t dig it, what’s the point?

* * *

61 comments

  • Re: Ninja Genesis

    Good god, (like you said, Chuck) do not do this in a non-urban fantasy novel unless you are ready to commit a LOT of time to revising the nature of your world as well as your story. Any moment you change one thing about the story, you have to pick at all the icky gooey worldbuildy parts that that latch to that piece of the story, which go and affect other parts of the world that affect other parts of the story and so on.

    Don’t be like me, kids. “I’ll figure out the details of the magic system after the first draft” is not a valid line of reasoning.

    However, Ninja Genesis sounds super fun for just about any other project.

    (also, another fantastic post great job best internet)

  • As a reader, my confession for the day is this: those big long paragraphs explaining the layout of the world, rendered in beautiful sentences with evocative adjectives and zesty adverbs? I skip ‘em.

    Also, Story Jesus declined my friend request on Facebook. :(

  • Great post as ever, dude!

    The only respect in which I let worldbuilding drive the story is when I have a cool idea — sentient non-humans that evolved at the same time as us, but on a different continent! — and then I work out what conflicts would arise from that situation. What happens when the two species meet? Do they have cultural differences that would cause misunderstandings? (Hint: of course they do!)

    The two facets, well, three in fact (setting, plot and character), do a complicated fandango together and I end up with a story…

    • Hell yeah! Though there I’d argue you’re still leading with story, or at least moving story forward along with the world — some worldbuilding I’ve seen (and, erm, done) focuses so much on random details that doesn’t focus toward the end result: a cogent, moving, compelling story.

      • It seems to me like the difference is: it’s okay to start with a cool idea for your world! But you have to figure out how that cool idea leads to a story in that world and develop the *story*, and not just the world.

      • True – it’s just that it may take me quite a while to find a specific story to fit into this world I find so compelling. OTOH my initial world-building tends to focus on culture and the broad strokes of history, not the random details – those I can make up as I write the book :)

  • Good shit, Chuck.

    In writing my first three manuscripts for my epic fantasy, I did a lot of dynamic worldbuilding. Serious. Pain. In. The. Ass to get consistency and flow, but now that I’ve written a few books there, I’ve worked out 95% of the bugs and it’s a fun world. Unfortunately, that’s the only way I know to do it; I can’t even write a good outline, how am I supposed to build a world?!

  • Oh, happy concurrence! I’m in the middle of a Ninja Genesis effort right now – what I did was pound through a NaNoWriMo month, then I wrote up a “brief history of the world” to fill in the broad strokes of what led to the Lich Lords taking over the world and finished up the draft (because strangely my epic fantasy book didn’t want to be just 50,000 words). I gave my story a little bit of time to cool off and then started the second draft, and let me tell you:

    It fucking sucks.

    Not the story (well that too right now) but trying to revise and build the world as I go is, um, well, it’s shit is what it is. I’m not even talking about lore or politics, I’m looking at basic issues like geography. How big is the island Our Hero lives on, and how long will it take him to get from one end to the other, because he’s going to have to do it more than once and I should probably know that detail shouldn’t I? How many people live here to make up the big armies in the final battle? Do the local wolves talk or don’t they talk, do they want bacon or your soul?

    This isn’t proctology, it’s alchemy of the Victor Frankenstein school. The first draft I have right now is effectively a skeleton I’m going to have to lay the meaty bits of my proper story draft on top of, and the bones aren’t even in the right places. I can think of five words I’ve already written that I will actually keep. Everything else? Consigned to the Void.

    Anyway: as ever, good stuff.

  • “Well, in the Middle Ages, women were basically sexy goats and dudes were the shepherds and I’m just being authentic…”

    YES! Thank you! I’ve read a lot of fantasy in my life and I’ve always wondered why DIFFERENT MADE-UP FANTASY WORLDS are so much like Earth’s Middle Ages. I get the ‘Write What You Know’ influence, but come on. This is a new world. You can do whatever you want with it. Does that mean a lot of writers want to live in the Middle Ages? Hmm…

    • There are also SO MANY MISCONCEPTIONS about the middle ages. People say “well back in medieval Europe…” like medieval Europe was anything CLOSE to resembling something like a unified culture. Just, ugh, no. England was different from the Holy Roman Empire was different from Scandinavia and people just really need to learn their history instead of talking about an entire continent and period like it was a cultural monolith. When people do that, it’s bad fantasy and even worse history.

      We also tend to work from the assumption that things got more progressive as time went on, but this is ALSO not true, for instance in regards to women. Example: before the Norman conquest of England, women could attend universities, attend meetings of politics, and advise the king. They ran co-ed monasteries (yes, there were co-ed monasteries with a male and female side; also, priests were once permitted to marry), widows were not forced to remarry or have their lands seized, and there was no statistical preference for daughters or sons in wills and inheritance. I’m not going to say that there was total gender equality, but it wasn’t the “sex goats/horny shepherds” situation either.

      I’m not sure if that paragraph made grammatical sense, but I hope you can see my point…

      • Absolutely. We’re talking about around seven centuries and a continent – it’s like equating 17th century Hungary with 21st century Britain.

        There was also Aethelflaed, Lady of the Mercians, Alfred the Great’s daughter, who was well educated, personally led armies and negotiated treaties, and ruled the kingdom of Mercia, first jointly with her husband and then on her own. She left the crown to her daughter – although her reign didn’t last long, it’s the only known occasion in British history when a crown has passed from mother to daughter.

  • Awesome post! I’m such a dork I have my own notebook full of world details (complete with topographical maps, indigenous plants and growing cycles..) to refer back to when I work on my novel.

  • 12. I like stereotypes. Stereotypes exist for a reason. But characters in a story are likely to be precisely those people who break stereotypes. Provide exposition through exception. All dwarves love gold and drink ale. Except your dwarf, who still loves gold, but prefers laudanum.

    17. An excellent way to purge these darlings is to crap out a short story about them. Then put it aside “to be developed later”. Like long after your dead so your children can continue publishing works in your world to keep the copyright alive.

    18. And please don’t set up a rule that is clearly there only for the protagonist to break. SO. BORING. AND. OBVIOUS. Your protagonist can be awesome without having to defy the laws of reality.

    19. Oh, fuck, yes. For my personal pet peeve, do a little research on actual polytheistic religions if a polytheistic religion is going to be central to your story. They don’t actually function anything like Christianity. Modeling a polytheistic church on Catholicism makes my brain hurt, and makes me lose all respect for you.

  • Thank you for this post!

    Worldbuilding is a powerful drug. This outline offers reasonable regulatory guidelines for the responsible use of worldbuilding for its intended purpose:)

    I’m a recovering worldbuilder. I spent months in the service of multiple worlds I had created, high on siren song of false productivity, only to look down one day and discover my staggering wordcount amounted to nothing more than a ream of paper covered in “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.”

    That was one crazy bad day. Actually, that’s happened a few times now. Actually its happening right now. I know this, because all this typing feels so productive. But at least now I know when I’m doing it and this post teases out the why, how, and how not to just a bit more, so thanks!

    Can’t find it right now – but I’ve come across George R.R. Martin interviews where he talks about having a super fan who he now consults regularly for continuity edits to his work in progress! He could care less about conjugating Dothraki verbs or how the actors in the HBO series are handling their high Valyrian. He seems to take an affectionate, bemused stance that is without ego. He seems to have his priorities in order – owning the role of storyteller, not fantasy worldcurator. An example of a heavy worldbuilder who also seems to have found his way? If only it didn’t take so freakin long to get there….

  • Great post! I found much useful information here, though my fictional world consists of a southeastern Alabama county with two main towns. Even so I have found myself mapping out the particulars between the county seat folks and the other town along with the farm folks. There is a social order that must be adhered to and the fun begins when that is broken. Being a Southern writer means dealing with stereotypes. There’s just no way to get around it. They exist. They are fun to play with, and can be valuable, especially when they can be totally broken down and laid bare by a character who has an epiphany and sees right through to the heart of something.

  • “Here’s some probably-really-bad and likely-untrue advice: give the audience only those details they need to know to understand the story.”

    Can I say: SO HAPPY to see this included here. I find that my writing style very much veers towards this–and I sometimes worry that I’m not showing the reader ENOUGH of the world. But to me–a lot of those details are boring. I don’t really care how exactly the currency system works. Not really interested in the plumbing or the lineages or the uber-specific fashion details. Is it pertinent to my story? No? Next!

    I guess I just have faith that my reader can and will fill in the blanks, if I give them enough information from the get go.

  • I admit that I’m a worldbuilding junkie. My approach is: build the world, put interesting people in it, then make something happen that changes both. That said, I rarely go beyond the basics–flora, fauna, factions, tech–before spewing the first few chapters, letting the details come to me as I go.

    This does, sadly, lead to a lot of exposition barf, which I try to streamline in later drafts. But at least I’m actually writing story while I’m also writing encyclopedia entries.

  • I’m lucky in my world-building arena: it’s the city I live in but in 30 years’ time. I had the main character kinda introduce himself to me while I was halfway through the writing of a sci-fi fantasy book… he stepped into my line of vision and introduced himself in the middle of a war scene (and Jeezuz, did he look out of place amongst all those Vikings and Indians and free-land owners in the middle of the forest they were fighting in!). I had to save the work, open a new page and start writing an interview with him immediately because he wouldn’t leave me alone.

    I never did get to finish that other book – but the war ended brutally, bloody and the good guys won…. well in a way they did; in other ways they lost big-time.

    I digress… I started doing research about Brisbane City and where it would be in 30 years’ time. I had to ask questions to the Brisbane City Council, Logan City Council, Ipswich City Council…. well, all of the councils to see what they were doing in the future. They weren’t too keen in me knowing not until I told them what my book was going to be about and that the reason for the plans I needed was to be the backdrop to my book…so my story could work around it all.
    Fortunately, I know what my city imports and exports, our customs, our sports, what happens around the place, events and everything that goes on here as I have lived here all my life. So, working on that was the easy part… tweaking the environmental parts and law, how we lived, food distribution, water (how clean it was) and housing (and how crowded we had become) was another thing I had to create. I also created new transport systems and educational infrustructure which worked around the armed forces so the city was more of military-runned arena…

    My world of where my books are set are a little darker than the world I live in now… but then, it’s the future; why wouldn’t it be? :)

  • Great list and illustrations, but the only thing where I’d slightly disagree (though I don’t think it’s a real disagreement) is I don’t see it has to be a choice between letting the worldbuilding come out of the story or ending up with a D&D manual. I tend to think of a story coming out of a dialogue between worldbuilding and plot/character, rather than either having to come first, and I like to let the worldbuilding I’ve done for one story inspire another story. Like having one story set in the world’s iron age, another with printing and flintlocks changing things, another in the age of steam, but all reacting to the same running themes in the same world.

  • “I’m remixing Cherokee myth with Eastern European vampires and throwing in a hefty dash of Stephen King’s The Gunslinger.”

    Wait, how the hell do you know what I’m writing? Has your beard been stalking me?

  • June 13, 2014 at 7:54 PM // Reply

    Amazing post! Literally my favorite writing related advice post that I’ve read.

    That being said.

    I wrote my first novel rough draft with 15 important characters and 7 first person pov characters (their pov separated by chapters).

    Now I have this Sci-Fi clusterfuck of a novel with that characters I want, the world I want, and the story I want.

    I’ve finally started flipping it over to third person omniscient with my first revision and I’d say its looking fairly professional.

    Just my experience.

Speak Your Mind, Word-Nerds