This is one of those posts I’m a little bit afraid to write, which at least is the sign of an interesting post, and occasionally the sign of a post that needs to get written. I’m hoping — ha ha heh heh ahem gulp fingers crossed — it’s the latter. (It’s also a way long post, so, erm — sorry?)
Hi, I’m the Internet’s Chuck Wendig, and I’m a racist.
And also a sexist.
And probably a handful of other “*-ists,” too.
I know. You’re saying, “Chuck, but you’re a feminist. And you speak out on Twitter against things like this.” Which is accurate. I do. And it doesn’t change my core assertion that I am these things.
Like, I’m not a super-racist. I don’t have a white robe with a peaked hood. I’m not some kind of uber-sexist, where I have some secret library of Pick-Up Artist books because I think women are actually just here to be the breeding stock for powerful men like myself. (Please note that I typed “powerful men like myself” with an eye-roll so dramatic I got dizzy and fell out a window.)
The thing is, I don’t believe these things at all. I’m not a conscious, overt racist or sexist. In fact, consciously, overtly, I’m against those things. I actively oppose them (though probably not as much as I should, and definitely not as much as I’d like).
And yet, I’m still racist and sexist and other -ists.
A lot of it is internal. Little knee-jerk reactions that speak to old, irrational, utterly dumb preconceived notions and prejudices — like ghosts that haunt the psychic hallways, ghosts I thought were exorcized but who still linger in interstitial spaces. (Want an example? When you walk the streets of New York, you hear a lot of different languages spoken. This is an awesome thing, ultimately, but once in a while I hear my father’s voice in my head: “Speak English.” And it’s like, whoa, where the fuck did that come from? How do I know they don’t speak English? How do I know they’re not trying to learn? Why do I give a shit at all? Half the people in this country that were born here don’t speak English well enough for me, so what the hell, brain?)
A good example is how I looked at my bookshelves a couple years ago and was like, “Yeah, wow, that’s a lot of white male authors on my shelf.” It was an error that needed to be corrected. Not because the books I had were bad, but because I was missing out on great stories and powerful voices — my reading experience was incomplete. My perspective was limited.
But it’s not always internal, either. Occasionally it’s woefully, regrettably external.
Sometimes, a thing just pops out of my mouth. Like a cork. My wife will be like, “You know, that was maybe a little sexist.” And I’ll be like, blink blink blink, whoa, okay, you’re right. I like to think I’m this enlightened guy and then it’s like — oh, yeah, no, I still say ignorant stuff.
Actually, the most recent one for me was transphobia. Like, up until a handful of years ago, I had no idea how transphobic I was. It wasn’t even a thing I recognized. I’d use trans slurs thinking they were totally fine. “Tranny” is a word I used, thinking, well, gosh, it’s just a shortened version of transexual or transgender and that’s cool, right?, not actually taking the time to remind myself that most slurs are insidiously simple like that. Many are just shortened words or quippy nicknames — harmless on the surface, but they’re knives that cut deep. And worse, indicative of use by powerful oppressors who don’t deserve to be the ones to give other people nicknames. (If you don’t understand this phenomenon and you think those words aren’t harmful, imagine you’re a kid, and a bully gives you a nickname that’s just an off-kilter version of your own name. It’s not your friends giving you the name, it’s someone who wants to — and maybe does — abuse you. Even a shortened, simplistic nickname is toxic, cruel, meant to mock you and steal your power.)
This seems like a dumbass idea to admit these things. I mean, the smart thing to do might be to just shut the fuck up about it, quietly fix the hole in the boat, and float on down the river. But this feels important to talk about. It feels useful to admit. Because I think a lot of folks have boats with holes in the hull that they don’t even know about. And here you might be saying, what’s this about? Well, part of it is spurred on by the Daniel “Lemony Snicket” Handler thing that happened at the National Book Awards. (Short version: in giving an award to Jacqueline Woodson, he then made a racist joke about watermelon. He has since apologized and donated money — here’s the wrap-up.) Part of it is just, y’know, confessional. It’s a hard topic and shitty things like this are good sometimes to drag out into the air and the light if only because that’s how you see them and how you (individually and collectively) deal with them.
So. Back to me, because after all this is a blog and blogs are pretty much me, me, me.
Why am I a racist, sexist, *-ist? Why are a lot of us that way?
I think this comes from a handful of places.
First, how we’re raised. Were my parents racist, sexist, homophobic, all that? You can bet your ass they were. Listen, real talk time? I grew up hearing the whole catalog of slurs. From my father, at least. At dinner, in the car, everywhere. Not just the slurs, but the stereotypes, too. It’s easy to blame him and shake my fist at him — but first, he’s dead now, so I’m pretty sure that yelling at the grave will do little good except rile the zombies that dwell there. Second, ennnh, there’s only so much you can do to change other people. You can try. You should try. But the generations who came before me are fucked up in a whole unholy host of ways. Often because of what trickled down from the generations that preceded them — old ways and ideas are inherited like genes.
Second, it comes from the media. The media is very good at kicking up dust. We’ve long gone past the point of the news offering up news — it’s framed as entertainment but even there, that word doesn’t quite fit. Our media is built around attention, and conflict, and drama, and while those things are quite lovely in our fiction, they’re straight-up toxic when it comes to our culture. The media is driven by the privileged status quo and it reflects that. After 9/11, Islamophobia was at a major high (and remains prevalent). Because the news media is very good at putting forward a narrative that carries that cultural phobia forward — it’s not that what they’re reporting is always untrue, but rather, that it’s a lie of omission. You get white people on TV all the time who are doing wonderful things — “Look at this Mayor, saving a cat from a tree. Look at this firefighter, fighting fires. Bake sale! Rescue dogs! White people doing white people good!” But when Islam pops up in the news, it’s pretty much, y’know, “ISIS AL QAEDA OSAMA (wait he’s dead) SHOE BOMB BEHEADINGS FEAR THE MUSLIM MENACE (we didn’t say that but wink wink no really be afraid).” They don’t often show, “Look, here’s a Muslim guy who opened a museum or who patches potholes for his community.” I mean, they don’t even show, “Look, here’s a Muslim family who stays quiet and has jobs and pays their taxes just like you, so for fuck’s sake, relax.” They tweak that twinge in your gut that, when you’re about to get on a plane and you see a guy in a turban (spoiler warning: he’s probably Sikh), your buttcheeks clench up and you think, OH GOD HE’S A BOMBER, even though that makes literally no sense and is pure, distilled kneejerk racism.
The news has been stirring the transphobia pot for years. “Eddie Murphy was caught with a transsexual prostitute,” and they make it seem like it’s the strangest, creepiest thing in the world. The prostitute is painted as inhuman, alien, someone very distinctly Other. And no one in the media at that time countered that narrative.
(And by the way, don’t think that this media problem is limited to news. Look at most of the winners of Survivor and — mmm, yeah, most of them are white, because of course they stack the show with white people and white people tend to vote out the people of color. Most of our dramas and comedies are predominantly white and straight and frequently male-driven, too. Films? Yep, same problem. I mean, how many women directors are out there? Or women comic book artists? These mycelial, fungal threads are all up in our media culture.)
Third, power structures. Institutions have ingrained power structures and nobody wants those to change. The people in power (who are predominantly white, male, straight) want to remain in power and so they keep people who look like them and act like them in place. It’s like an oblique form of nepotism — no, those other people aren’t your actual family, but when it comes to all these -isms I’m talking about, they’re wink wink like your family.
Fourth, laziness. I think humans are fundamentally lazy. Challenging a worldview doesn’t seem like a lot of work compared to, like, digging a ditch, but breaking one paradigm and replacing it with another takes psychological effort, and we’re not always very good at it.
And here you’re saying, well, I’m excusing the -isms. Right? By identifying causes outside of me, I’m blaming those structures and those institutions which means I can wipe my hands and say, whew, and go back to being whoever I want to be. I can look at the scraggly, unkempt lawns of my neighbors and use it to excuse why my lawn is scraggly and unkempt, too.
But I’m not excusing it.
I’m just trying to say that it comes from somewhere. It’s important to recognize things like that so we can deal with them — individually and, yes, culturally.
Because there’s a fifth thing, an umbrella cause to it all, and that’s privilege. Privilege is pretty easy to see in action — if a straight white dude walks into an Institution of Power (a bank, a college, a TV station, whatever), he has a statistically better chance of finding success there than if he were some combination of not straight, non-white, and non-dudely. Look at it this way: amongst Fortune 500 CEOs, most of them are white guys. So, you either have to admit that there’s a privilege to the power structure or you instead have to opine that white dudes are just better than everyone else, which is fucked up and hyper-privileged and oh, hey, shame on you. (And the same goes with the disproportionate incarceration of black men in the US prison system. You either have to admit that there’s a continued privilege to being, well, not a black guy when it comes to the law, or you have to be a shitty person who says, “Well, maybe it’s just because white people aren’t criminals, haw haw haw,” which, y’know, fuck you for saying that. The privilege is up and down the road for people like me — we get the education, the jobs, the money, the guns, the assumptions of innocence, the breaks, all of it.)
The freaky thing about privilege though is that it’s blinding.
We just don’t see it.
It’s like an accent we don’t hear (“Me? I don’t have an accent. It’s you that sounds weird”). It’s like failing to recognize our own stink.
Privilege is often invisible to those that possess it.
This is due, I suspect, to a few things.
One, a lot of folks with privilege are not perfectly privileged, and so it becomes a whole harder to see and then admit. Like, if you’re a white male who has a shit job and not a lot of money it’s hard to recognize your privilege — in part because you have less of it (in RPG terms, money adds bonus modifiers to your existing Privilege Score).
Two, because guilt is often a hidden thing and we don’t make a lot of effort to drag it out into the light. Inherently we recognize privilege (“That cop let me go, and he wouldn’t have if I was black”), but then do a lot of intellectual squaredancing to cover that up (“Buh, whuh, well, it’s not the color of my skin it’s that I drive a nice car and I work hard and was friendly and lots of other reasons that are actually only indicative of my privilege and ahh crap there’s that word again”). Or worse, you don’t recognize it because, “Oh, see, he gave me a ticket, too, so, hah, privilege isn’t real.” Yeah, okay, sure, you got the ticket, but you didn’t get shot, did you?
Three, an unconscious desire to keep our spot. A meme went around Facebook recently (I know, I know) that showed how one teacher demonstrated privilege by giving everyone in the class a wadded up piece of paper and asking them to shoot a basket into the trashcan at the fore of the room. And the people in the back had a hard time making the shot, but the people at the front had it easy. (I’d also add in the axis that says with every new aspect of privilege you gain — white, straight, male, money, etc. — you get another shot at the basket.) The people at the “front of the class” don’t want to move their seat. Exposing privilege — showing a rigged system — is exposing the benefits you have received. That makes folks uncomfortable.
Four, we’re frequently surrounded by a total lack of diversity — in our schools, in our social circles, at work and in the media — that it’s hard to even figure out that privilege is a thing that exists much less it’s a thing we possess.
Five, the status quo is easy to see, but difficult to see what makes it problematic. The way things are presently often feels very normal — “it is what it is.” Inertia. Acceptance. Reality.
Though, once you see privilege —
Man, you see it everywhere.
(Same goes for rape culture. At first you’re like RAPE CULTURE ISN’T REAL, but once you have your eyes opened to it, it’s like, oh god we live in a horrible reality what the fuck is wrong with us.)
So, what’s the point of this whole post?
You know, I dunno. I’m not saying anything particularly new or revelatory, I realize. I just think it’s important to admit these things and apologize for harms done — because once you kick over the log and see what squirms underneath you can take to addressing it.I regret saying stupid, shitty, edgelord, South Parky stuff, of course. The goal is to move forward and do better. But you can’t deal with it until you see it. I’m a privileged guy. I don’t always recognize my own ignorance — in fact, the ability to not recognize it and to continue on like nothing happens is itself part of privilege. I don’t say any of this to excuse it or to just push past it, but rather to shine a light on it. It’s why we need diversity. It’s why we need to challenge ourselves and others to do better. It’s why “outrage” sometimes matters — it’s very easy to feel “outrage fatigue,” but that in and of itself is a privilege because some people have to live that outrage every day. We can just turn it off, but others? It’s there, 24/7.
What’s to be done?
I don’t have any great answers.
I’d say it’s important to listen.
It’s critical to signal boost.
It’s important to believe what other people tell us when they say they’re victims of these -isms that plague us individually and institutionally.
It’s vital to recognize our own privilege and — counterintuitively — work against it.
And I think we need to pass the good ideas onto our kids and not the shitty prejudices that came to us from generations before.
Like I said earlier, we look to other people’s unkept lawns and use it as an excuse not to keep our own, but that’s all twisted. We should do the other thing. We should keep our own lawns in the hope that it encourages others to keep theirs in return.
We gotta do better. And hope others join us.
I’m obviously a writer, so for me, it’s important to see diversity in writing and publishing — and not just in the half-a-nod “We need more white guys writing diversity into their books,” but also in the writers themselves, and within the industry. As such, I now point you to:
The We Need Diverse Books Indiegogo campaign.
I politely ask that you go there, give a little something.
And as I’ve said in the past, maybe take a gander at your own bookshelves, too. And your own work, And, if you’re in the publishing industry, look to your own hallways.
Anyway.
Thanks for reading.
Paul Weimer says:
It’s difficult to see the water that those of us with privilege because of race, gender, and country of birth are swimming in. But see it we must, to do better. We gotta do better, agreed.
November 23, 2014 — 9:20 AM
Jane says:
Well said, sir. I too am a racist and a sexist in the same way.
But it’s just like being genetically predisposed to heart disease. If you’re given that diagnosis, you don’t just go “Oh well, that’s it, inevitable. So I’m going to go out and smoke and drink and eat myself into a fatal heart attack”.
Merely possessing such predispositions doesn’t mean you have to encourage them.
November 23, 2014 — 9:22 AM
Chris Lites says:
Excellent post, Chuck.
November 23, 2014 — 9:29 AM
Dee Carney says:
Thank you.
November 23, 2014 — 9:30 AM
Deborah Smith says:
Speaking on behalf of no one but me– I try my best to be fair and good and think and say and do the right thing–getting it halfway right about half the time as my brain sorts through the intricacies of what my puny words and actions mean in the gigantic scheme of things . . . it would be helpful if the obvious clickbait-obaters like TPM wouldn’t run headers like “Lemony Snicket’s racist Obama joke.” Which referred to Handler saying maybe he’d ask the President to approve if he wrote a story about a girl of color who was allergic to watermelon. Ill-advised Handler comment? Based on a culture of racist intentions? okay.
But did it deserve that headline?
November 23, 2014 — 9:38 AM
Jess says:
My father once commented that he didn’t get why “the gays” needed to march and protest for the right to marry: why all the parades and “in your face” activism. I pointed out we are in a country where only extremes can shine a light on existing -isms: change doesn’t happen without someone pushing comfortable people out of their comfort zone (even if I’m just pushing myself).
Thank you for this post.
November 23, 2014 — 9:41 AM
tedra says:
Good words.
November 23, 2014 — 5:56 PM
M T McGuire says:
I’m an awkwardist. I genuinely don’t have any issue with race, gender, ability or disability, height, colour, sexual orientation. We’re all just people, right? What I have is the terrible fear I’ll put my foot in it. Fear that if I’m talking to a coloured person I’ll say something crappy and racist without even realising. Or worse, I’ll say something by mistake. I used to have a line in my e-books “if you’d like to stalk me on social media, you can find me in these places”. My editor pointed out, tactfully, that if someone who had actually been stalked read that, they would take it as me trivialising what had happened to them. I try so hard to think and yet I do this kind of shit all over the place. It’s like that episode of Fawlty Towers when nobody is allowed to mention the war and they all do.
So yeh, I absolutely get you because that’s me as well.
Cheers
MTM
November 23, 2014 — 9:42 AM
Gurukarm says:
So with you, MT, re awkward. Once, quite a long time ago, on an email list I belonged to at the time, I used the phrase “in a coon’s age” – having grown up in the country, not to mention being incredibly stupid, I sincerely thought it referred to raccoons. Um…. no. Well. Live and learn, apologize where necessary, and clean up one’s act going forward.
Thx for your excellent post, Chuck, and, as a Sikh, thanks for the shout-out to the fact that someone you see in the US wearing a turban is nearly certainly sure to be a Sikh.
November 23, 2014 — 12:45 PM
M T McGuire says:
Mwah hahharhg! So glad I’m not the only one 😉
Cheers
MTM
November 23, 2014 — 5:22 PM
storyteller5 says:
I thought it referred to raccoons too!
November 27, 2014 — 10:55 PM
Gurukarm says:
Hah, storyteller – thanks for that – I too am glad I wasn’t the only one, hahaha!
November 28, 2014 — 1:52 PM
Becky Black says:
I’ve been pondering a post on this same thing, but you’ve said it better than me, so I’ll just tell people to come read this instead. (Damn, now I need another blog post idea.)
If we’re raised and live in a racist, sexist, homophobic etc society then those ideas are in our minds from the time we’re old enough to take notice of the world. Even if we’re people who are the subjects of the prejudiced ideas and stereotypes. Some are lucky enough to encounter people, or other influences that counter those ideas, that encourage us to think for ourselves. Others just parrot them back and make things worse.
But even people who try to think for themselves have got to be on guard continually against those ideas. They are sneaky things, ideas and while the big gross ones are easy to see coming and head off. The smaller insidious ones can worm their way in. I worry when I see people who claim they are totally 100% not racist (or whatever) because to me that means they’re not prepared to examine their own thoughts and words critically. If accused of being racist they’ll become defensive and before you know it are telling people “You’re just being over-sensitive.” Because it can’t be them in the wrong, they’re 100% not racist after all.
You’ve got to be aware of your weaknesses to fight against them. It means admitting something most of us don’t like to face about ourselves, but you should always know your enemy – even when the enemy might be parts of your own mind.
November 23, 2014 — 9:50 AM
Dave Higgins says:
Tricky article to judge objectively.
I know people from less privileged intersections who find high-privilege socially aware individuals admitting they can’t always escape cultural conditioning one of the strongest drivers for change they know.
I also know people from less privileged intersections who hold mentioning it to be narcissism (you don’t need to tell people you are making a change to make it, so mentioning your struggle is asking others to validate your already privileged existence).
Personally, I am more inclined towards the benefit to others of hearing “being imperfect doesn’t mean you are allowed to try less” is greater than the problem of any unconscious search for more privilege by the messenger.
November 23, 2014 — 9:52 AM
Jason says:
Would have to agree. I am a very well travelled person and enjoy music and tv from around the world but I looked at my reading material recently and realized it was very slanted, King, Crichton, Wendig….. so many white dudes. In the spirit of do something about it I suggest Haruki Murakami (1Q84) & Khaled Hosseini (Kite Runner) as good places to start.
November 23, 2014 — 9:53 AM
storyteller5 says:
You might want to try a female author too. If more men gave female authors a chance, we could go by our real names instead of using initials. 🙂
November 27, 2014 — 10:54 PM
Kevin Burton Smith says:
Like Margaret Atwood? Like Alice Munro? Like Agatha Christie? Like Leigh Brackett? Like Janet Evanovich? Yes, some women hide behind their initials, just as some men do, but it seems most women aren’t afraid of being identified as women. So save the tired, antiquated charges of sexism for something a little more important. It cuts both ways.
Do you think all romance writers are delicate female nymphs with names like Avril deFleur or Lavender Desir? Would you buy a romance if the author’s name was Irving Dirk? Or Bertha Plottz, for that matter? These days, genre probably has as much– or more — to do with an author using a pen name as gender.
November 29, 2014 — 12:06 AM
storyteller5 says:
Wow, defensive and angry much? Those are very distinct examples of women who write “literary” fiction, which is mostly centred on women and read by women. (With the exception of Agatha.) How many of those authors do you read, I wonder? Never once did I say ALL female writers use their initials, but a lot of us do, not because we’re “hiding,” but because we want all readers, including men, to give us a chance.
Many women writing horror, thrillers, or anything dark use initials. And again, I’m not saying ALL women who write in those genres do. But a lot of women have found more male readers would give them a chance if they had a more androgynous name. If you think this sexism is “antiquated,” perhaps it’s because you’re a man. Maybe you should do some research and read some of the articles about how poorly female writers are represented in the bestseller lists, the NY Times profiles, or the big writing awards, such as the Nobel Prize for literature.
And I don’t buy romance, but if I did, the author’s name wouldn’t bother me. I’ve bought so-called “women’s fiction” written by men, so yeah, I would if I was interested in romance. I’m friends with quite a few female writers and I wouldn’t call any of them delicate OR nymphs. I’m not sure what your point was supposed to be.
Even Gillian Flynn has said that many men told her they were shocked that they liked her book because they “don’t normally read women.” If you think this still isn’t an issue, you’re living under a rock, or in a place where it doesn’t affect you at all. But it does affect a lot of us. I’m happy for you that you don’t have to deal with it, but that doesn’t make our experiences any less valid. Thanks for trying to trivialize them, though.
November 29, 2014 — 12:59 AM
Kevin Burton Smith says:
Chuck’s initial post, in case you didn’t read it, was about how we’re all a little -ist, when it comes right down to it. Despite our best intentions. That includes me, of course. But it also includes you.
So here goes…
Nope, I’m not particularly defensive at all. Or angry. More bothered by the same old claptrap that keeps getting mindlessly repeated, as though repetition equals truth.
Yes, sexism still exists. You won’t get any argument from me on that one. But do you surrender to it and merrily play the victim card, or do you fight it?
You’re the one who claimed that if only “more men gave female authors a chance, we could go by our real names instead of using initials,” implying you have no choice but to hide your gender.
Really?
Look around. There is no shortage of women writing under their real names. Something even you acknowledge. Even in genres once associated (often incorrectly) with exclusively male readerships.
So sister, you always have a choice. If other writers can do it, why not you?
Make a stand, if it bothers you so much. Stop aiding and abetting your own victimhood. Unless you enjoy your victim status. Sexism’s certainly a great hook to hang poor sales on, after all.
You’re a woman? Let’s hear you roar. Stop hiding behind “storyteller5,” for example. Or is there a wide-spread conspiracy against female bloggers as well? Darn, the whole world is so unfair.
By the way, most readers are female, so is it really only men who discriminate? If so, why not focus on the larger group of potential readers (women) and not worry about male readers? Aren’t you doing your female readers a disservice by denying your gender?
And then you “wonder” if I’ve read the authors I listed. Why? Because I’m a male reader?
Doesn’t that itself seem a little, you know, sexist on your part?
I’m sorry to burst your little bubble, but I do actually read the women whom I named. I’m familiar with their work, and have written about several of them. My favourite crime writer right now might be Laura Lippman.
You are obviously less familiar with the writers I named. You dismiss my handful of examples as “very distinct examples of women who write “literary” fiction. Yeah, that Janet Evanovich. So literary. And such a “distinct example.”
But that was sort of my point — that different genres, be it literary, fantasy, romance, crime, etc., play by different expectations and assumptions, including author’s names and their purported identities.
Silly but there it is. We assume all westerns are written by tough, raw-boned hombres. All romances by sensitive, passionate women. But of course they’re not. Writers slap on pen names aimed at different markets. Does that make male romance writers who hide behind a female pseudonym sexist? Or just the largely female readership?
I’m actually working on a book on women writers, some of whom DID go by their initials or hid behind male pen names. And some didn’t. Eighty years ago. Fascinating stuff there. Both the stories they wrote and the stories of the authors themselves.
I would never say that sexism is non-existent in publishing or the world at large (I don’t need Gillian Flynn anecdotes to tell me that some people are a little behind the times), but there are plenty of men and women in plenty of genres who bravely write what they want to write under their own names. Both now and eighty years ago. You could look it up.
Giving into the madness doesn’t stop the madness. And whining rarely does.
Yes, even now, if some authors choose to use a pen name (like you, perhaps), the choice might be based on a fear of sexual discrimination. But it could just as easily be a marketing decision based, rightly or wrongly, on genre expectations. Or an effort to protect their own privacy. Or to create another writing “brand.” Or maybe they just like the way their initials sound.
Some writers even find the use of a pen name to be liberating when it comes to creativity. The use of a pseudonym thus becoming a sign of creative empowerment; not capitulation to sexism.
Maybe it’s time we writers assume the best — not the worst — of our readers. Maybe it wasn’t the author’s gender that made someone not buy a book. Maybe it was the lousy cover. Or the fatuous blurbs from Amazon? Or *GASP!* the writing itself.
If your big bad publisher is making you deny your own gender identity and it’s so important to you, maybe it’s time to find a new publisher.
Surrendering rarely wins the war. Chuck suggested we fight the isms wherever they appear. WHEREVER they appear.
Make it so, Ms.5.
November 30, 2014 — 4:32 PM
storyteller5 says:
First of all, I don’t have “poor sales.” Second of all, I wasn’t only speaking for myself. And you’re right, I’m the one who’s sexist. It’s all my fault that women often write under their initials. I’m the problem. You got me.
All I know is I made a lighthearted comment that was partly in jest, and not even directed at you, and you exploded a huge anger ball on my ass. It must be because the poor male writers are so discriminated against, you’re right. I am such a sexist pig for alluding to the fact that some female writers have to use their initials to increase sales.
I opened my storyteller WordPress account years ago because I don’t necessarily want every troll on blogs like this to know my real name. That doesn’t mean I’m scared of you–I just don’t want to waste any more of my time talking to you.
I have books to write.
And btw, Janet E.–literary or not–has a readership that is 99.9 percent female. And most female authors know that a lot of writers who go by their initials (J.K. Rowling for instance–guess she’s hiding due to her poor sales as well) are women.
November 30, 2014 — 7:30 PM
Smith Cassidy says:
Ugh, I deeply regret clicking the button to be notified of new posts in this thread. Not because of you specifically, storyteller, but this who post is one big ‘problems middle class white people have.’ And it’s so boring, worse than debating religion or politics because it’s so amorphous, ambiguous…downright fucking elusive.
I can sum it up pretty succinctly: everybody’s got a little asshole in them. Men, women, black, white. Everybody.
Done.
December 1, 2014 — 12:15 AM
Yvonne Hertzberger says:
ALL of us are “ists” of one kind or another. I’d go so far as to say ALL of us are racists – for all of the reasons you describe. Our job, or duty, if you will, is to be as conscious as possible of our “ists” and to do our utmost to combat them. Those “ists” are all forms of prejudice, that is having an opinion formed on something other than real evidence seen with our own eyes and minds. They are an inevitable part of being human. But to accept that without seeing the need to challenge then is to fail in our quest to achieve out full potential. As long as we remain complacent or unaware we fail. We may consider ourselves as successful, not bv eliminating all our “ists”, as that is impossible, but be seeking to become aware of them and challenging them.
November 23, 2014 — 9:53 AM
mshatch says:
Your words resonated. I remember my father making subtle racist comments against blacks and then follow up with, “but…some my best friends are black…” and I’d think, really? Funny I don’t ever see them here at the house…
I don’t want to be prejudiced but I know some of those old attitudes I was raised with lurk inside me.
Excellent post.
November 23, 2014 — 10:05 AM
Dawn says:
Well said, sir. Among the (very, very many) books in my possession are works by white guys, white women, non-native English speakers, black men, black women, and a LOT of Chinese writers, either translated or written straight into English (or even French then into English… I’m looking at you, Dai Sijie). I think it’s important to have this so that we can see through things rather than just peeking round the edges and thinking we understand. I’ll never fully understand what it is to be Chinese, of course – I’m Caucasian and was born and raised on the south coast of England – but I have a far better understanding because a huge percentage of my collection are Chinese works of fiction, non-fiction books about China, by Chinese writers or by Western writers who’ve spent time in China, giving yet another perspective.
Racist and sexist remarks are something many of us grow up hearing, and so we don’t take any notice, we don’t necessarily see that these things are wrong, even when those remarks are directed at us (e.g. sexist ‘jokes’ which, once you look more closely and speak up, you get, ‘it’s just a larf, innit, lighten up, love’, etc.). But reading a wide variety of books helps us to understand that this thinking is not only wrong but cruel, massively misdirected misunderstanding of what it is to be other than what you are.
I was bullied at school, verbally rather than physically, but the scars still remain. I know what it is to be singled out for ridicule. I’m also a writer and a hippie and arguably I’m a bit weird. But weird by whose definition?
Thank you for this post. It’s important.
November 23, 2014 — 10:09 AM
percykerry923 says:
Timely article, Chuck, in view of Mr. Handler’s comments at the National Book Awards, and also because the highly contentious case of Michael Brown’s cold-blooded shooting is coming up in court for a final hearing, if I’m right. No surprises that the case garnered attention because an unarmed black teenager was shot by a white officer in a Southern town.
Also, as far as we are talking about privilege, would you not agree, Chuck, that LOOKS are also a huge factor in motivating people’s bias against other people? i mean, haven’t we all seen that good looking people are unfairly, but quite truly and very unduly, favored over average looking people- whether it is jobs, dating, or any other thing? I think good-looking people also enjoy privilege over the average Joes and plain Janes- more often than we would like to think. What would you call this bias concerning looks?
November 23, 2014 — 10:13 AM
Harvey Stanbrough says:
Wow. Chucky, wow. Sorry buddy. I’m not gonna queue up to shake your hand or kiss your ring or whatever. I’m just not a member of the Kumbaya Circle. But I do hope you feel better, having assauged your own self-perceived white guilt.
Personally, I look forward to a world in which Intent is returned to its rightful place as carrying more weight than Perception. But I don’t really think I’ll see that, not in my lifetime. Not with “open minded” writers leading the charge after having imbibed the mind-speak-think Kool-Aid. And yes, I know I should end the comment right there, but as you obviously know, I just can’t.
I couldn’t help but notice this was all centered about “white” this and “white” that. It’s almost as if there is no other evil on earth and no other nations on earth where everything is based primarily on having skin of a different hue.
Case in point: Are there law-abiding, job-attending Muslims living among us just going about their lives? Yes, of course. Does that mean living in Iran or Iraq or Afganistan or any other nation in which Islam Rules is a good place to live for a female? Um, NO, Chuck, it doesn’t. Yet I saw not a peep regarding any of those folks being “sexist.” This despite your admonition that we “should” (ugh, don’t get me started on whether or not we “should” hunker up and “should” on other people) strive to change others. Apparently, you only meant “we” (white people who have a penis and heterosexual tendencies) “should” endeavor to change “others” who also happen to have a penis and heterosexual tendencies.
Now lord knows (it’s just an expression… I’m actually an atheist) women of any race are never wrong, bless ’em (well, you know, except those unfortunates who live under oppressive Muslim regimes that still enforce stone-age laws but really that’s okay onacounta it’s “part of their culture” or those other unfortunates who are so “protected” from the influence of WASP American Males that they undergo a medically dangerous and mind-breakingly painful procedure called a “female circumcision” because it’s “part of their culture” or any of the millions of other unfortunates who don’t live here so they can be just absolutely peachily blessed by white male “feminists” smiling and telling them they don’t have to play with dolls, doggone it, if they don’t want to and really shouldn’t even if they do want to. But I digress.)
Well, I’m just all disappointed and stuff. I guess I was led astray by your colorful use of the language to say what you mean. I guess maybe that somehow misdirected me, caused me to think you were an Open Minded Original Thinker, as all writers should be, and not just another faux-guilt-ridden WASP who drank the Kook-Aid. Anywho, I do like what little I knew of you before today enough to say honestly (no political correctness here at all) that I seriously do hope you feel all better now.
Finally, unlike you and every other Kool-Aid drinker I know, I also have come to understand it actually ISN’T my job to change you despite the fact that *in my opinion*, like a baby kept in a locked suitcase after being fed Milk of Magnesi you desperately need changing.
But no biggie. My own biggest complaint about the series of outright, agreed-upon lies we collectively refer to as Political Correctness was always that I’d rather know where the other guy stands, honestly, even if that knowledge “offends” me. But I was wrong about that too. It’s true that we can’t know where the PC person stands, honestly, on any given issue, but at least we know they don’t stand at all. And seriously, that’s good to know.
November 23, 2014 — 10:22 AM
terribleminds says:
I have seriously no idea what the fuck you’re talking about. Your comment is barely parseable. I’m not exactly sure at what point I endorsed clitoridectomies?
I’m not sure how to respond, exactly, so I’ll just say this:
I do try to be open-minded, and I want other folks to be the same, but sometimes being open-minded is not a natural state — we do not drift ineluctably toward open-mindedness in the same way that most doors start shut and stay that way. We must forcibly open them, and it’s best to start opening them with ourselves, which is a lot of what this post is about.
Whatever else you think is going on here, it probably isn’t.
Also, the fine folks at Jonestown drank Flavoraid, not Kool-Aid, as a point of historical trivia.
Poor Kool-Aid.
— c.
November 23, 2014 — 12:22 PM
Yvonne says:
I’m pretty sure the reason Chuck focused on male privilege and white privilege is (just spit-balling here) because Chuck is a white male, and he was talking about himself.
November 23, 2014 — 6:47 PM
Harvey Stanbrough says:
How about just don’t “judge” anyone at all? Based on anything? How about resign as General Manager of the Universe? How about treat everyone with respect? How about don’t assume, based on race or skin color or gender or nationality or anything else, that any particular person or group of people “need” your help or your fine defense? Wow, what a world that would be.
November 23, 2014 — 10:28 AM
Yvonne Hertzberger says:
It would be wonderful. Unfortunately we need to remain ;aware’ because none of us can actually achieve that goal.
November 23, 2014 — 10:30 AM
Fatma Alici says:
Sure, that would be great. It is at the current time impossible to achieve. I say this not because I have issues. Or, that I feel society is irredeemably corrupt. It is actual how the human mind works. People naturally, and for good reason, categorize and organize things into groupings. And that has lead to bias.
And the fact is you make the decision to not judge. To treat others with respect. That is a choice, therefore it is not an inherent action.
I myself am not a terribly fond of being political correct all the time. Nor, am I let everyone hold hands and ‘be one with one another’. Ugh, even thinking it makes me a bit queasy. At times, Wendig, does over dramatize things, but I sort of like that so I cannot object.
I think at the heart of the article he merely asking people to examine themselves. In my opinion, that is never a terrible thing to do.
November 23, 2014 — 10:51 AM
Harvey Stanbrough says:
I capitulate to your wisdom and edit my response above thusly: How about we all MAKE THE DECISION not to judge…. (the rest will read the same). Problem is, neither do any one of us have the right to tell anyone else not to judge. So much easier to just continue to inhale and exhale and realize managing your own self is more than enough.
November 23, 2014 — 11:29 AM
Savannah says:
I think what Chuck is saying here, and I am of course inferring, is that sometimes for us not to judge we have to realize our own existing biases. I think if you were to ask most Americans, for example, if they are racist, they would say no.Yet racism absolutely exists in our society and it isn’t perpetrated by just the extremists like the KKK. It seeps into our lives in less conscious ways. I think the point is not to say, “Oh look, an oppressor!” but to realize that sometimes no matter how well intentioned, every single one of us has been guilty of contributing to inequality. Does that make us evil? No, but it does make us ignorant to certain things. You can’t change what you are not aware of. Ya know?
November 23, 2014 — 12:21 PM
mangacat201 says:
Very apt clarification, I’d say!
November 23, 2014 — 1:03 PM
usaeducator says:
I’m sorry your a liberal who believes he is all the things in the article you wrote and so is everyone else…good bye…you are exactly I hoped you were not.
November 23, 2014 — 10:28 AM
terribleminds says:
If you visited this site before, you’d realize it’s predominantly a site for writers. I’ll just leave that little irony here. Anyway. Uhh. Bye?
November 23, 2014 — 12:18 PM
milkaholicclown says:
Nice to hear you bear your soul on this. It’s uncomfortable, but so is spring cleaning and ear irrigation. I, too, have a religious/bigotry deprogramming command running in the back of my head. Every time I find another blind spot, it’s a little bit shocking… makes me a little less sure of myself and what is what or just what I erroneously assume–about everything.
The only thing that I balked at in your essay was the bit on Islam. As someone who comes from an oppressive fundamentalist religious background, I assert that these insidious religions are brain-cancer/AIDS/Ebola. The people caught in them, through even worse programming than what you can relate with, are victims–with a terminal case of Stockholm Syndrome. “We, the religious virtuous women, cover our heads or wear a bedsheet, because of our own free will!! Well, there is that bit about everlasting punishment, curses and doom if we don’t, but it’s a gift mmm an effing gift. So what if we can’t own property in whole countries or go anywhere alone? So what if our culture says we were asking for it after we got raped and then our own brothers/fathers murdered us for honor… asking for it. God knows best.” I shudder. It’s serious. Whatever invisible sadistic kill-bots that used to possess those of the Christian crusades era have jumped over to those of Islam. Even still, if you open a Bible and follow the passages literally… it’s easy to justify murder of all flavors.
Of course the average Muslim family doesn’t go out chopping people’s heads off! But what do they say in their homes, when “infidels” are murdered by their brother zealots? Hmm? I know what people said in low whispers when a Christian zealot murdered an “abortion doctor” when I was a kid. They outwardly condemn, but on the low-down, shh “god avenged those murdered babies. praise god.” It’s a brain disease! A heart disease. It’s a festering blight afflicting mankind–an intelligent scourge that seeks out the poor, suffering, otherwise vulnerable and the young–fresh infection served up with a side of charity.
I pray education saves us all. A bit of continued education with a lion’s share of suffering, humiliation and alienation is what ‘saved’ me, ultimately. Not that I’m saved *shudder* cause we hear that all day in church. I just finally woke up and am still coming to terms that my life is not a sacrifice to an invisible being that “loves” us but makes us slaves–don’t mind the deadpan smile, we just love our god so much. Now I must put Humpty together again… alone. No kings, no horses.
What I mean is I’m still piecing back together my shattered soul from it all, but hell, I survived and that praying voice in my head that never used to shut up? It’s mostly silent. Progress.
November 23, 2014 — 10:31 AM
terribleminds says:
I know a lot of Christians and the ones I know outwardly and inwardly condemn abortion clinic bombings. I know far fewer Muslims, regrettably, but the situation is the same. Terrorism and the violence of Islam or any single religion is minor compared to the peaceful practitioners of that religion. Now, one could make a larger argument that the conservative facets of individual religions are harmful to humanity at large (or at least to their given governing nation-states), and that’s fine. But what you’re saying isn’t that, and you’re painting with far too broad a brush for my tastes.
For me, I’m comfortable with folks practicing whatever religion they like — or lack of religion — long as it doesn’t piss in anybody else’s cornflakes. When it does that, then a different conversation needs to happen.
— c.
November 23, 2014 — 9:13 PM
khaalidah muhammad-ali says:
As a woman who is Muslim and African-American I am confronted with any number of awkward situations where people say things to me, sometimes intentionally, sometimes not, that are questionable at best and flat out racist at worst.
The good news for people who are afraid of saying the wrong thing is that we can usually tell the difference between the two and that makes all the difference in the world, but it doesnt give anyone a pass.
I’m a little bit of an anomaly and will never fit anyone’s idea of what society says I ought to be, and in this, I am certain I confuse people. I get a lot of, “You’re not like them…” or some variation thereof. Know that this is an insult.
Also, when corrected on saying or doing something perceived as bigoted by a person you’ve offended, DO NOT DEFEND THE POSITION. Just listen and learn. You can’t know what it feels like better than the person you’ve offended.
November 23, 2014 — 10:37 AM
Yvonne Hertzberger says:
Well said. Unless we remain open to correction we change nothing. And if we are embarrassed because we slipped and the person corrects us, that’s OK. What’s not OK is, as you say, to dig in and defend our position.
November 23, 2014 — 10:40 AM
Fatma Alici says:
I know what you mean. The things people have said to me over years because I am a Muslim and half my family were immigrants would blow some people’s minds. And worse part they don’t even realize how hurtful it is.
My favorite is when people complain about people coming over and taking jobs or some such. I remind them that my father, sister, and brother are immigrants. “Oh, not you those other people.”
It does not take away from the hurt of those statements. In all honesty, it does not make me feel any better either. Some people understand when I explain it. Others do not.
November 23, 2014 — 10:56 AM
Fatma Alici says:
I’ve often told people that everyone has inherent bias. This is not because everyone is a bad person, it is way the human mind works. If you can accept that, then you can keep track of what you say, how you say it and it what it means. Otherwise, they will control you.
There are groups of people who I immediately take a very hostile stance with when I meet them. I grew up in a small town as to where my family were the only Muslims. My mom is Christian which made them dislike that even more. A woman even told my mom how sad it must be to have my father living in sin like that. How it be nice she can repent for him. So to this day I have a knee jerk reaction to Christians. It is unfair. It is not right. But now that I accept that I do my best to make sure it does not overly color my behavior and feelings.
In contrast, the small population of Hispanics were always extremely nice to me. So I have an overt friendly reaction to any Hispanics. Which is equally not a good idea. Because, it makes me bias in a different way.
The trick is not to let these weird insidious thoughts control your actions. It isn’t always easy. Most people have some reason for these biases. Maybe, they didn’t grow up around different types of people. Perhaps, they had a bad experience. It doesn’t change the fact you are still painting everyone with same brush. That isn’t good for anyone.
November 23, 2014 — 10:43 AM
Craig Forsyth says:
Agreed. More than a decade ago, my sister finally felt able to start living the life she’d wanted (and, frankly, deserved), after years of conformism. I had difficulty expressing my feelings about this in anything approaching an adequate way.
What I wanted to tell her was that we shouldn’t live in a world that made her feel she had to label herself, just because her life varied from what we consider the mainstream. Unfortunately, this came out sounding more like “why do you need to tell people that”, and the more I tried to explain myself, the worse it got.
I would love it if such a world existed, where campaigning and protest were unnecessary, but it doesn’t. One day, perhaps, but until then it seems we’re stuck with labels of one kind or another, so people can demonstrate that they are as entitled to the privilege, respect and compassion the rest of us enjoy, and we can support them in their right to make those claims.
November 23, 2014 — 10:47 AM
Amber Love (@elizabethamber) says:
I think calling out the institutional -isms is fair game. I don’t always bite my tongue (or tweet). I saw a photo on Twitter yesterday of some “nerdery” company announcing that they will be hiring 100 new nerds. Their picture: about 25-30 white men. I tweeted to them without remorse that that’s nice of them to fit so many white dudes into their nerd structure. And people wonder why women and minorities and the lgbt nerds out there don’t feel welcome! It’s because of things like that. It’s why that the one photo from Image Expo had a backlash; if you know Image you know they have some diversity in comic staffers and content but the photo they posted was a stage full of white dudes. May as well as have been holding a big “KEEP OUT” banner.
Like your father’s stance, mine is similar. My father can be very racist and thinks Obama is the anti-Christ coming for his guns. However, my father loves Fred Sanford and Bill Cosby. There’s no way in Hell that he will stop loving Cosby. It’s an argument I do not the strength for. I can’t tell him to reconsider watching these specials and worshipping this man he has idolized for his entire life. Nor do I want to point out that his taste in admiring black men falls squarely into “as long as they’re funny” trope because at least he likes someone.
Also, don’t take over anyone’s hashtag. NotAllMen and GamerGate are the biggest piece of shit appropriations I’ve ever seen on Twitter. People need their hashtags as their safe zone to discuss the injustices they are dealing with.
November 23, 2014 — 10:49 AM
tedra says:
Just like the Victoria Secret ad with all the skinny women that was supposed to portray the perfect body. One instance its all, young girls be yourself, then its, but when you grow up be like everybody else.
November 23, 2014 — 7:30 PM
Histamine Queen (@worddroppings) says:
Pretty extensive post. Lots went into that. I’m always happy to see an able-bodied white male talk about privilege. (And that example about the teacher teaching privilege? That’s cool!) Education in some states will be better than education in other states. (I’m in TX. Sigh.)
When you said what can we do? Listening and signal boosting definitely help. There is something else that can be done or maybe I missed you saying it ’cause I read the post really fast. Acknowledging privilege exists is an important thing to do. For example, when my husband and I were still renting, we never had a problem getting approved for apartments. Was that because we were a white couple? Or because we really never had any problems?
I also think you missed an important -ist…but then that would have made a long post even longer. Ableism is another one that people should spend some time with. It’s another one that creeps in and you don’t even realize. (That’s lame! is a great example.) As someone who isn’t exactly able-bodied, I’m surprised how much I’ve caught myself in this -ist.
November 23, 2014 — 10:52 AM
Davide Mana says:
Chuck, you just voiced something that’s been nagging me for years – not because of any choice I made, I was born and raised in a culture (which is more or less the same we all share, with a minimum of variety) that is by default full of -isms which I consciously abhor (sp?) but that are there, waiting in the shadow.
So when I write my stories (for instance), I spend a lot of time asking myself if something ugly is sneaking in my writing without me noticing – ugly stereotypes, offensive cliches or just plain toxic memes.
Am I conforming to genre expectations, or am I actually perpetrating some ugly prejudice?
It requires attention, and a lot of self-observation.
All in all I think keeping my “-ism alert system” always on is making me a better writer – if not a better human – but it’s pretty tiring. And sometimes one feels a little paranoid…
“c’mon, is just an Asian sexy woman in a split skirt kicking ass in a bar brawl–what can be wrong with that?!”
Yeah, right, what?
If we want to change the culture in which we were born and raised – by good people, that’s how crazy this is really – we need to be aware, we need our alerts always on.
So, thanks for this post.
November 23, 2014 — 10:57 AM
Kevin Wallace says:
This is actually a huge part of the reason why I write. We, as humans, are programmed to see “us” and “the other”, since old days of nomadic tribalism. Today, the world has changed, and we have to change with it. We interact widely with everyone in the world at the speed of electrons through undersea network cables, and there are so many tribes that we’re all “the other”. Each of us has ways we deviate from the norm, so each of us is simultaneously privileged and discriminated against (and yes, I’m a white male, but I’m certainly not trying to be diminutive of other people’s very real struggles here).
Since early on, I’ve been told that I’m cold and logical, and I’ve been described by people whom I love and respect as “empathically challenged, but not quite in that Dexter Morgan sociopathic way”. Writing puts me in the head and personal thoughts of someone who I never would have had the chance to identify with in the past. I’ve subscribed to a personal ethos that if I can’t understand why someone would make a certain decision or think a certain way, I must be missing something vital about them. So… When I write, I get to create a person who I want to understand. It’s not perfectly effective, but it has led me to some interesting places.
My main protagonists these days tend to be black, or women, or very religous, or very different from myself in a way that I can’t entirely understand. It violates that “Write what you know” adage, but I think it’s for a good reason, anyway. Even if it’s terrible and off-the-mark in a profound way, and if nobody reads a word of it, it’s helped me to have a perspective that I wouldn’t have had before this what-if thought experiment. In essence, I’m writing what I want to know.
November 23, 2014 — 11:08 AM
Jason Rohan says:
This. This is why I’ve been reading you these past four years. Real Talk, honesty and the willingness to admit to imperfections.
November 23, 2014 — 11:42 AM
Gina Anderson says:
Focusing on the Daniel Handler part of it. He must’ve forgotten that he was the host of the National Book Awards and was not doing a comedy set at his local club. I’m sure his jokes were not coming from a racist place, but he did undermine the black authors who were honored that night. It is something very unconscious that I’m sure he saw nothing wrong with his jokes. The reflection should not be whether “Am I racist,” but was that appropriate for a professional writer to say in a very public venue. If you look at it from a professionalism standpoint, then you can go back to not having to think about it in the context of race (because everybody hates thinking about race, especially if you don’t have to live in minority skin). What he did is what we call commit a “microaggression.” If you need the fun and BuzzFeedy version, here’s an article with images: http://www.buzzfeed.com/hnigatu/racial-microagressions-you-hear-on-a-daily-basis . If you want the NY Times version, here’s that one too with more words: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/23/us/ferguson-grand-jury.html?rref=us&module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=U.S.&action=keypress®ion=FixedRight&pgtype=article .
The term “microaggression” was used by Columbia professor Derald Sue to refer to “brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, or environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults toward people of color.” Sue borrowed the term from psychiatrist Dr. Chester Pierce who coined the term in the ’70s.
November 23, 2014 — 11:55 AM
Casondra Brewster says:
Teaching my children about big umbrella of privilege that shelters all the -isms has been one of the toughest parts of being a parent — especially where my sons are concerned. I plan to use the paper-basket exercise. Brilliant! This should hopefully have impact with especially my youngest who is an athlete. He’s all about fairness, but can’t understand when I call him on things he does/says that are sexist or racist or all about his privilege (he especially suffers from the ‘but we aren’t rich, we’re not privilege” blinders. And this is why we admit it and talk about it. We share experiences and tactics and tips and recognition. Without that we can’t move forward towards the just world we want our children to live in.
November 23, 2014 — 11:59 AM
bhunting9999 says:
Best post I’ve read yet! Is it ok to post on FB? Is there an easy way to post on FB?
November 23, 2014 — 12:17 PM
Jessica Zellers says:
Can’t thank you enough for this post. If your readers glean only one lesson, I want it to be this: be aware of your own privilege, and be aware when others don’t share your same privileges. I’m not asking people to change their actions or their words or even their thoughts, not at first. Start with that awareness, and see what grows.
This essay anthology is a few years old, but for further reading, dip into it for some insights: Are We Born Racist?: New Insights from Neuroscience and Positive Psychology.
November 23, 2014 — 12:17 PM
bhunting9999 says:
Duh–just found it.
November 23, 2014 — 12:18 PM
daniel quentin steele says:
I probably shouldn’t write this, but who the hell cares. What I love about the wonderful men and women of your generation is that you are so, so so perfect. And if you’re not exactly perfect, you still carry the seeds of BAD thoughts and if you’re white you carry in your genetic code the evil that thousands of years of white superiority and domination of the world has inbued you with, you’re TRYING to do better. You’re trying to atone for the sins of being born white and/or male to prejudiced, cruel, inhuman monsters we used to call our parents. But you’re better than all that.
You, like Barack Obama, will change the world for the better. You will make the world a better, more kind, more loving environment in which 10,000 flowers can bloom. You will thin out the musty libraries of dead old white men to make room for the work of talented women and people of color and third and fourth and fifth world artists, for the gay, the transgender, the DIFFERENT no matter what they are.
And if I smile at some of the more insufferable accounts of your newly, hard-won perfection, it is only because I remember how the Boomers sneered and pitied their stupid and insensitive parents. We tried to understand them, but really, they were hopeless. We were going to change the world. We had the power of a huge, influential population behind us, the moral superiority of fighting an unjust war and marching and dying in the south to help our Black Brothers achieve the freedom they had long deserved.
And the advance guard of our generation, the Hippies, wanted to change it all. No more conventional marriage, sex without emotional constraints, communes where all would work together for the good of the group, no more sexual jealousy or possessiveness, drugs that liberated the mind and would usher the world into the Age of Aquarius.
It was going to work because we were smarter and better than everybody who came before us. But something happened. Except for a few isolated souls who burrowed deep into the bowels of universities around the nation where they could continue to disseminate their wisdom to young minds full of mush, the dreams died. The communes died because you cannot eliminate selfishness and you cannot have sex without emotional ties and the jealousy and anger that follows after it.
The belief in a world liberated from the shackles or reason and western civilization died – everywhere except college campuses where no one could fire you for being a crappy professor or a propagandist. The Boomers’ idealism died in the daily struggle to raise kids and feed them and house them and hold jobs in a world where all the jobs were flowing out to all those third and fourth world countries. And to China which will one day rule the world.
So, it good for a survivor of that world to look around and realize that you guys and girls are going to do what we never could. I do wish you well.
The only regret I have is that I doubt I will be around here 75 years from now when you – grown old and preening in your successes – will look to your great grandchildren to celebrate your greatness, and they will call you stupid and bigoted and piss-poor citizens of their world. They will look at you and pity you for not being as advanced and humane as they are, because they will find a thousand ways you have screwed the world up.
Yeah, I will miss that.
November 23, 2014 — 12:19 PM
Craig Forsyth says:
I think that’s called progress isn’t it?
November 23, 2014 — 5:45 PM
Yvonne says:
RE: “You will thin out the musty libraries of dead old white men to make room for the work of talented women and people of color and third and fourth and fifth world artists, for the gay, the transgender, the DIFFERENT no matter what they are.” But is it a competition? Why can’t we just build bigger libraries?
November 23, 2014 — 7:01 PM
terribleminds says:
I’d say this world is a lot better than the one that existed 74 years ago. At least, this country. It’s not without its new challenges, but remaining vigilant helps us overcome them and continue to (slowly, ever-slowly) ascend, not descend.
So you’ll forgive me if I don’t care much for your pessimism, here.
November 23, 2014 — 9:16 PM
Anne Leonard says:
I think a lot of this “-isting” or othering is atavistic — different is threatening on a primal level. But the thing is, we have these big brains that we can use to overcome that. So when I have a racist reaction to something, that doesn’t make me a terrible person, but it does signal that this is a place where I have to work harder on a more conscious level to not let it influence my behavior in a hurtful way.
November 23, 2014 — 12:25 PM
Joanna DaCosta says:
We are all full of -isms, that are hard wired, because we are tribal beings. I am of mixed race/ethnicity, black Jamaican, white Italian, British, Sephardi Jew, and Lord knows what else. My mother was baptist, my father is atheist and there is a storied family religious past that includes initial faith, and then complete distrust of Catholicism, and Judaism. Still, I grew up in a homophobic, racist(my mother and grandmother hated/didn’t trust Asians), and class driven household (my father disliked and forbade us from mixing with the proletariat.) White men don’t have the corner on ingrained bias. There are reasons that we have these ingrained biases, good, or bad. We want to protect ourselves, and our families. We are afraid of change. We have an idea of what is right, and good in the world.
It’s also important to remember that as individuals, and as a society we have shiny moments where we really try to be better than our nature. Those once shiny, now crumbling programs that are in place, like affirmative action, are meant to override our base nature, so that an average performing minority has the same chance as an average performing majority, who may have other things going for them like friends, or family in high places, or simply a human gatekeeper of the same race/ethnicity/gender. We all relate to people like us. We root for people that look like us. It’s how groups survive.
November 23, 2014 — 12:26 PM
mark matthews says:
Honest and self-reflective dialogue we all should have with ourselves. I was dismayed when Mark Cuban came out with similar honest self-disclosure and was hammered for it. I see you are being hammered as well. Admitting and looking at our own biases and where they might have come from doesn’t have to be some kind of white blank slate of faux, liberal-driven priveleged guilt, as it seems you are being accused of.
November 23, 2014 — 12:39 PM
Savannah says:
I was also upset about people’s response to Mark Cuban. I think he was really trying to be forthcoming about a very touchy topic.
November 23, 2014 — 12:49 PM
Savannah says:
Thank you Chuck for writing this! Once every month or so, I open up a word document and begin to write a post about privilege and once a month I fail. My laptop is a graveyard of progressive posts. I don’t know if it is a product of fear, or just a general inability to form a cohesive thought, but I have failed epically to send this message out into the world. So thank you for doing what I could not. I try very hard to be a good person, to always be fair and reasonable, and yet on occasion I catch myself saying things that perpetuate privilege. I too, have flippantly used the word “tranny” and now realize how charged of a statement that is. I think the world needs more of this post, so that we can all take a little more responsibility for the world we have helped to create.
November 23, 2014 — 12:47 PM
mangacat201 says:
Spot on… and very relevant. I think the ability to safely self-reflect and then move past those ground-in knee-jerk hindbrain reactions is one of the most important lessons an individual in our new global society can learn. And even though I consider myself a liberal, progressive, intellectual woman I got pointed towards the whole controversy around Bill Cosby by a friend, who has a hard time dealing with the triggery nature of the coverage right now – because everything’s saturated not only by the news in and of itself, but also the discussion over the controversy which puts another burden on survivors in their daily life even though it’s meant to heal and shed light on an important discourse – the first thing that popped into my head when I saw the article and the picture of the woman putting forward the accusation, was ‘there’s no way way that wholesome family harmless comedy guy’s done something like that, what?’. And then I had to literally beat myself over the head with a metaphorical baseball bat that said, ‘seriously, why the fuck are you perpetuating this bullshit, of course that could have happened to her and it’s shitty first thoughts like that that kept her from coming forward for the years it’s apparently taken to get it out.’ And I’m embarrassed and feel betrayed by my own brain and the ground-in conditioning of my cultural heritage which is exactly why we need to have these discussions about ripping down the curtain even against our own instincts, because it’s the only way get better at this thing called a decent life. Thank you for contributing and opening a forum for the exchange.
November 23, 2014 — 12:52 PM
Mikey Campling says:
I agree that we must always push for greater progress towards equality, but we must also remember how far we’ve come. My teenage kids would be horrified by the racist, sexist and homophobic attitudes that I was surrounded by when I was their age. Those days have gone, thankfully, but the job isn’t done yet. Sadly, in times of austerity, there are those who seek to stoke the fires of hatred. I hope we can ignore their rhetoric and move forward to a more tolerant future.
November 23, 2014 — 12:59 PM
Lanny Larcinese says:
Dear Chuck — a most interesting post, but first my bona fides: I spent 35 of my adult life as a staunch liberal, perhaps to the left of Marx. For the last 15 my perspective has become conservative, not wack-job conservative as befits the liberal stereotype, but more able through thought, study, and debate to discern social and political notions worthy of conserving. With that in mind, your post is redolent with liberal guilt, probably based on the usual liberal idealism and desire to create “fairness” (read equality) in all aspects of society, at least to strive for same. Allow me to give you permission to do both, i.e., to harbor all your feelings without feeling so damned guilty about it, yet strive for FAIRNESS in our BEHAVIORS rather than thought police or in your case thought-self-police.
The long view of history and human nature reveals that it is quite normal to identify with groups, which, of itself, gives rise to perceptions of alientation and threat by other groups, and that such thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are in place because they have survival value. So while you bemoan that state of affairs, I assure you that other groups (black people, Muslims, women, the unpriveleged, communists, capitalists, etc.) are ready, willing and able to eat your lunch. Does that make us barbarians? Nope. (See “group Identity” above.) After all, there is survival value in society, too,. and morals, mores, systems of governance, etc. are in place to foster mutual survival.
Next, antithetical to cusomary liberal belief, we are not equal, will never be, and arguably should never be. There will always be disparity in ability, effort, etc. and with that, disparity of life’s rewards as well as potential individual fulfillment based on those rewards. I am glad Bill Gates is smarter than I am, or that Chuck Wendig is a better writer. They both are paradigms to help me do my best.
Finally, while liberal though fosters that we all look alike and are treated alike, it has no problem belittling, ostrasizing, and plain ol’ shuting up anyone who thinks differently from its own goup-think, resulting in twisted logic like Clarence Thomas being a pariah but Al Sharpton being a leader. (Try being a conservative in the writing community or certain other precincts.) I get confirmation bias and that thinking antithetcal to our own is “threatening,” yet that writers, the guardians of language and therefore thought, and who have witnessed the deleterious effects of censorship, should not allow for all voices, is onerous at best and intellectually stifling and hypocritacal (& to that extent, self-defeating) at worst. It is also why your inner laundry comes out as a mea culpa rather than, “we all have these feelings, but we also have altruism, a sense of justice, and willingness to be fair.” To occupy both states concurrently is to meet the JFK standard of being an “idealist without illusions.”
Thank you for your post. I love your honesty and openness, to speak nothing that you are a helluva writer. And thank you for providiing the forum for me to add my own thoughts.
Lanny Larcinese
November 23, 2014 — 1:13 PM
Mike S. says:
Lanny,
Respectfully, the idea that liberals want everyone to be equal in intelligence, beauty, athletics, health, or wealth is a lie made up by conservatives to discredit liberals and draw attention away from other arguments. That’s not our argument. I will never be as smart as Stephen Hawking or as athletic as Michael Jordan, and as a liberal I never expected anything to change that.
This is about a certain bare minimum amount of rights recognized for everyone. That’s not equality, except for equal protection under the law. That’s fairness. If I can walk through a dark alley in my town with a risk of rape so small as to be insignificant, then any other person should have the same risk of rape in the same circumstance. That doesn’t mean every woman or transgender person walking in my place also deserves to be a tall, fat, middle-aged male.
-Mike
November 23, 2014 — 3:36 PM
Terri says:
Fabulous post and I noticed immediately that those who disagree with you leaped to the same old same old worn out false equivalencies (As soon as I hear “kool-aid” I roll my eyes so hard it hurts.) There is phenomenal evil in this world and it wears skins of many hues. That Mexican man with MS-13 inked on his arm is not misunderstood and oppressed. He is fucking death on wheels. In my prosecutor/public defender days, I had clients from every part of the rainbow. I found a few patterns, but in general, criminals are criminals.
I’m a middle-aged white woman. Irish is probably about as radical as my DNA gets. It just is what it is. Am I privileged? Of course I am. Although I am teetering on the brink of another -ism, which is ageism. Some days it works in my favor, some days it works against.
Case in point, about a year ago I was pulled over for a major traffic infraction. I mean major, as in “impound my vehicle” major. I was guilty as hell. I had something incredibly important to do and my vehicle had an issue. I rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. (Full story is writer con noir at the bar worthy.)
Did I even get a ticket? No. By the time I was done with that cop, he had pulled over his mom. I tugged every heartstring. With every fluttery hand movement, quivering upper lip, strategic tear in the corner of my eye, I convinced him not to roust me. It was an Emmy-worthy performance. I played to his own ingrained prejudices of being a midwestern white boy. Hey, I did not want my vehicle impounded.
Now, let’s look at the -isms here. Could a woman of color (even middle-aged) pulled that off? Doubtful. Could a younger man or woman have pulled it off? Probably not (maybe the right girl, but that’s another story.) Could a man of color have pulled it off? Oh hell no.
I was also raised by a total racist. He was a man of his time and I struggled with it as a kid. I saw through most of the bullshit, but it seeped in like a slow drip. I acknowledge it and try scrub it out. Some days I do a better job than others. Not because of white guilt, but because racism and sexism are bullshit.
My law school was quite diverse, with a large Cherokee contingent (school was renowned for its Indian law program.) I tried to explain to my friends some of the crap I was raised with. They were quite taken aback by some of the attitudes that were commonplace in my working-class upbringing. I wasn’t looking for applause, just asking for understanding if I ever stepped on my tongue. It was like being born with a physical handicap that wasn’t readily visible.
My engineering school was also quite diverse in another way. They recruited heavily through embassies in the middle east. With few exceptions the men in my classes were sexist pigs. They were not sexist pigs because they were ethnically Iranian or Iraqi, they were sexist pigs because of how they acted. They’d been raised that way. As adults, it was their choice to act that way or recognize it and change. Many did. Some didn’t.
We are in the throes of a social revolution. Power, in the form of economic, cultural, political, and societal, is being redistributed. Well, who held the keys to the kingdom? White straight conventional-Christian men. So, every time a woman, someone of color, LGBT, etc. makes a stride, guess where that power has to come from? Yeah.
Last year I read a great article that i unfortunately can’t find again. It talked about the upheaval. Young white men grew up expecting to inherit the farm, the business, the job at the mill from their father. In the harsh economics of the 70s – 80s, dad lost the farm, the business, and the mill closed down. Their expectations of rising through the hierarchy that was their birthright were dashed. Woman and people of color were not overly sympathetic, “hey, welcome to our world.”
I didn’t coin this phrase, but have always used it. Our current political system wishes for a return to the old chain of command. White men in command and all others in chains. The election of Obama disrupted that. Before, no matter how bad things were, you could look to the White House and see an old white guy. It was comforting. A young black man wasn’t. (*cue the calls of “you libturds are the racists, always playin’ the race card” yeah, whatever.)
I’m far from PC. I can appreciate an off-color joke and have no problem objectifying men in tight jeans. The difference is I see it for what it is, something that tastes good without being overly good for me. Like jelly beans. Now, at the podium or in the media, I wouldn’t say such as thing. I probably wouldn’t say “fuck” either. Just like I wouldn’t eat jelly beans for dinner.
Many thanks to Chuck for using this blog to continue discussions into things that aren’t always comfortable.
November 23, 2014 — 1:20 PM
ce_murphy says:
Please forgive me for linking to a video here, but I think this is hugely relevant to what you’re saying: last year, an Irish drag queen named Miss Panti gave a tremendously emotional speech about (specifically) homophobia, but it relates exactly to what you’re talking about.
I don’t tell people to watch videos online in general, much less ten minute long ones. This is an exception. This one is *important*, because it tackles what you’re talking about here in a very effective way.
November 23, 2014 — 1:21 PM
mangacat201 says:
That was an inspirational and thought-provoking speech that I feel, hit the argument Chuck was trying to present with this entry perfectly. Food for thought, indeed.
November 23, 2014 — 1:55 PM
Sarah_Madison says:
Brilliantly stated, as usual. I frequent say and think the same things, only to come here and find you’ve put it together far more eloquently and strongly stated, so then all I have to do is point to your blog post and say, “What he said.”
But the truth of the matter is we need to do more–and stopping the parroting of what we’ve heard or been taught our entire lives is part of moving forward.
November 23, 2014 — 1:23 PM
Scarlet Darkwood says:
Great article, and I’m glad you admitted what a lot of us are hesitant to admit. I won’t say I’m racist, because I don’t believe there’s a race that’s superior or better fit or stronger than another. However, I am prejudice, which means I do have my own personal attitudes toward certain cultures (I’d be lying through my teeth if I denied it). We’re all prejudice on some level, whether or not we want to admit it. Some of this was most definitely a learned thing, but for me, much of it is from witnessing behaviors or experiencing things first-hand. That doesn’t mean that I can’t make individual choices within a group, to select those whom I learn to adore on a personal level. I do believe in being fair, being as respectful as you can be regardless of what you might feel inside. But that doesn’t mean you have to be void of emotion or preferences. We have them. Period. I just try to conduct myself in an outward manner that’s as socially acceptable and mindful as possible.
November 23, 2014 — 1:35 PM
Kevin Burton Smith says:
Good post. And it’s important to realize that when you say we are ALL racist, sexist, this-ist and that-ist that you mean ALL OF US.
Stupid prejudices (intentional or not) are not limited to pale males. The solution is to speak up against ignorance and intolerance wherever it appears. WHEREVER it appears. Being a victim of prejudice doesn’t automatically make you prejudice-free.
November 23, 2014 — 1:37 PM
Abbey says:
Re. Privilege: I had a conversation with a black, male friend of mine about how men don’t recognize the abuse/fear women face daily. Because, if a woman is with a man in say, a dark parking garage, the fear is not there… the man’s presence means the risk of the consequences of being a female alone in a dimly-lit area is automatically lowered… because, well, she’s not alone.
He responded with a comparable situation. At certain restaurants in his city, being black means he gets a very distinct reaction from staff. His white friend said he was nuts and took him to one such restaurant. Everything went splendidly. But, as my friend points out… his being with a white friend means the privilege was sort of transferred. Like the friend, by bringing him to dinner was signally to the staff, no, this one’s cool. See, he’s with me and hasn’t stolen my wallet or anything.
These situations are exactly why people are so blind to privilege. If you have it, you can’t see it, because well… you have it.
November 23, 2014 — 2:14 PM
Waka says:
wow – this is one of your great pieces!! – I know the place you’re coming from… New Zealand – colonial outpost of the UK – I’m aware of the family programming – I got many chapters into writing a book called ‘My Life as a Racist’ but ground to a halt… you have inspired me.
November 23, 2014 — 2:18 PM
Peg says:
When I was a kid in St Louis, the big threat from my father and older siblings was “We’re going to take you to Kinloch (99% black neighborhood), throw you out of the car, scream “N–r” and then drive away.” I was taught to fear black people, especially black men. It was constant. As a teenager, whenever they knew I had a boyfriend, they would ask “Is he black? No? Good.”- Even though I did date men of color and they knew it.
But I went to school with a black kid and he became one of my closest friends, when my bike got stolen, Venosta was the one who helped me look for it- not my father or brothers, and my mom was the Director of a nursing home where most of the workers were black, so I learned to question this blanket “All blacks are scary and want to kill you.” idea, because I was exposed early on to diversity and I knew it wasn’t true.
Even knowing that my father and brothers were full of shit, I still find myself having to push down racist thoughts. I can say that I’ve raised my kids differently than my father, to the extreme. My kids ended up going to a predominantly black school district in a city that was 50-50 white/black but the schools were 90% black because so many white parents sent their kids to private schools. That was the smartest thing I could have done to break the cycle. My daughter is a Social Justice Warrior and I’m proud that she is, but it doesn’t come without a price- as obvious by some of the comments here- the pushback on trying to fix the problem is ridiculous.
Watching the livestreams in ferguson and seeing what happens in reality, compared to what the media says happened, made me feel insane, like a conspiracy theorist. You simply cannot trust most of the media to portray the reality of a situation when they are mouthpieces for the institutions that refuse to admit there is a problem.
Now I have a teen son who is disabled and gay and that has opened my eyes up to another world of privilege (try to find a YA book with a gay, disabled protagonist that’s not overtly sexual, pickins are slim).
So, we are writing a novel together with characters he can identify with. It’s one thing we can do as writers. Break the stereotypes. Write people as they are, not what we have been told they are.
November 23, 2014 — 2:31 PM
Mike S. says:
Nice article, as always.
As I became aware of real feminist issues, and racism, and the things I was doing to make the problem worse, I tried to change. I’m sure I still do a lot of harm, but I’m trying. But I think I’m mostly aware of the problem. And then for the kicker – for a while I was proud of myself, and how enlightened I was.
Then it dawned on me, I was being self-congratulatory for hitting somewhere near where the baseline should be. We don’t tell average people, “It’s time to celebrate, you’re not a murderer!” and “Throw a party, you’re not a con artist!” So “I’m not quite as much of a bigot as I was as a teenager” shouldn’t be something I felt like wearing on a badge.
Keep writing, and have a good holiday.
November 23, 2014 — 2:33 PM
terribleminds says:
That’s definitely key, I think — I’m not trying to pat myself on the back, here, but rather, trying to keep my back up against my own failings now and going forward.
November 24, 2014 — 9:16 AM
Lydia says:
I think your words were spot on. Thank you for writing something worth reading in the blogosphere.
November 23, 2014 — 2:45 PM
AquiZen says:
“At first you’re like RAPE CULTURE ISN’T REAL, but once you have your eyes opened to it, it’s like, oh god we live in a horrible reality what the fuck is wrong with us”
As time passes I feel like Sam Neill at the end of ‘The Mouth Of Madness’ screaming from behind the bars of a prison where the patients of the mental asylum have taken over. Except the prison is the world and the cage is our culture.
It’s increasingly clear that trying to change the hearts and minds of others over these “ism’s” is a tough mountain to climb and your message to accept your own privileges and innate prejudices and fix yourself is an own goal worth scoring.
Thanks for the laughs.
Elly
November 23, 2014 — 3:07 PM