Book trailers are notoriously ineffective.
Not necessarily crappy (though I’ve seen my share of those, too) — but usually ineffective in the sense that, it’s not selling me on the book. Hell, most of the time I’m not even sitting down to watch it because I happened to hear you put two words –“book” and “trailer” — together, and I know what means.
You say “book trailer,” klaxons go off. Sirens. A randy goat-man comes up and kicks me in the junk drawer.
A couple-few weeks back on The Twitters, I asked what it was that made an effective book trailer. Not a quality one — because many are quality and yet offer no effect (again, that effect being, “makes me want to run out to the store and throw all my money at your book”). As it is that we so often define things by their negative, a handful of elements kept popping up:
First, that book trailers sometimes looked amateurish. Even if the book trailer had quality in one area (say, the filming), it had poor quality in another (acting). Or, it’s just a right awful shit-fest from start to finish — and a truly bad trailer will go a very long way toward not merely failing to sell the book but making sure I’ll never ever read that book, not even with someone else’s stolen eyes.
Second, if it was a live-action trailer, it was selling the movie of the book better than it was a book. It’s using a visual medium to sell a rather inert and bulky block of text.
Third, and related to the first, actors used to portray characters have now “become” those characters in the minds of the viewer. So, where before the book is a wide open orgy of imagination, suddenly the book trailer starts nailing elements to the walls and the floors and it limits your, erm, “creative orgy partners” to a few actors instead of the infinite carousel of faces and body-types whirling around inside your skull.
Fourth, other trailers were too simple. A few image stills, sliding text, creepy music — BOOM. BUY THIS BOOK. THE CREEPY MUSIC TELLS YOU TO. YOU’VE JUST BEEN INCEPTIONED, MOTHERFUCKER. Except, not really. As such, it does the opposite of the live-action trailers — it fails to engage any of the wonder of the book and ends up being so boring it’s like clumsy missionary sex with an old fishmonger.
Other smaller complaints popped up.
Some trailers are too long. Some too short. Some don’t match stylistically. Are they an advertisement? A short film? Are they just a tremendous sick-bucket of wasted time?
I asked around behind the scenes: “Should I do a book trailer for Blackbirds and Mockingbird?”
The answer was a robust shaking of the head. “Don’t waste the time. Don’t waste the money.”
And at first I was like, “Yeah.” I mean, we have minimal data whether book trailers work, right? And it’s not like authors make super-huge bank anyway, so — my initial thought was, “Eff that in the bee-hole.”
But it nagged at me.
I thought, “Okay, those things that are a problem for book trailers, you don’t have to do those things.” As we tell our toddler, B-Dub, “That’s yucky. Blech. Ptoo. Don’t eat that.”
No movie. No actor. No creepy music and straight text. And definitely don’t make it suck.
I figured there were a couple ways to go.
Book trailers that are funny have been good. Even amateurish book trailers are fine in this case — hell, the more amateurish they are, sometimes the funnier they become. And an idea popped inside my head and I thought, “Hey, I’m a funny guy.” (This is where you correct me and start pelting me with cat turds and I run off the stage crying into my bonnet.) Then I thought, “Oh, hey, people like to hear me curse, and the Miriam Black books are full of all manner of pickled vulgarity.” So, I pulled out all the naughty sayings I could find and strung ’em together like a series of very dirty, very angry Christmas ornaments, and the script sounded absurd, insane, and… kinda funny. My initial thought was to get a bunch of other authors and fans reading the script and I’d supercut that sumbitch together, but, y’know, no time.
Instead, I read it myself. You probably saw that trailer — it’s right here.
But I had a second trailer in mind. This trailer would be pure voiceover with… something in the background. Text, or images, or… I don’t even know. And the trailer wouldn’t sell the books so much as sell the character — she’s the angry, chain-smoking cornerstone of the series, and so it seems wisest to push her. And I’m a storyteller, so I thought, the smartest way to play it would be to tell a new story. A very small “flash fiction” story, written like a script, a first-person script, and use that to sell the character. So, I wrote a couple short pieces but my favorite was the one that was a bonafide story and was in fact not from Miriam’s POV — it was from a man who met Miriam and what that means for the man.
At this point I’d already had an offer on the table from my Alpha Clone, Dan O’Shea, to read something of mine and record it — anything at all. So I told him what I was thinking of for this trailer and I tossed him the audio file and in like, ten minutes, I had the first recording. He did a second for me and it was like — it was like gold. My wife listened to it and I watched her just fall into that voice (he’s got a sexy, grizzled, broken-glass-and-cigarettes voice, that guy). It blew me away. (It was then I wondered: could someone do an audio book trailer? Why couldn’t you? *files for later*)
I was also talking to a director at that point, Alan Stewart, about how to make this happen and the cost and all that, and initially we’d talked about getting an actor to play Miriam to do a thing where she read all the profanity or maybe did a speech about your death, playing off the core tenet of the series (touch you = find out your demise), but again, that means putting a specific Miriam into people’s heads. I didn’t want to do that. (Not without big bank from selling the film or TV rights, anyway.) So, I passed him the voiceover and Alan had this idea for kinetic text, and —
Well. I’ve posted the trailer down at the bottom of this post. Some of you may have seen it already because I was geeking about it hard yesterday, but before you view it, some questions for you.
What makes an effective book trailer? Or an ineffective one?
What are some book trailers you’ve liked?
Have you ever been convinced to buy a book via the trailer?
What are some particularly bad ones you’ve seen (if you care to share)?
And, feel free to let me know if this new trailer, below, does the trick. Be honest. Polite, but honest.
Second trailer for BLACKBIRDS and MOCKINGBIRD.
robert bucchianeri says:
I watched all the way through. That’s a victory for you. Compelling!
August 29, 2012 — 7:30 AM
Esme Pilbeam says:
Makes me want to dive head-first into the book. Which I plan to do, just as soon as, uh, I get done taking a very, very, cold shower.
Is it hot in here or is it just me?
August 29, 2012 — 8:14 AM
Evelyn Lafont says:
I’m not usually a fan of book trailers (Other than my own. Wait–did I just exemplify narcissism?) but I really like this one. In fact, if Allen Ginsberg had a book trailer, it would have been like this.
My only criticism, which may be more of a personal preference than an objective observation, is its length. I would love to see it end after, “Can I touch you?” because you’ve just presented a total quandary–she can tell him when he’s going to die, something he likely wants to know AND doesn’t want to know and you’ve told me that he finds her sexy–which means he has another reason to want her touch, so this is a real dilemma that I want to then pick up your book to keep exploring. Alternatively, it could end with, “I won the bet” because again–it would end with my interest in Miriam at another peak which makes me want to pick up the book.
But again, I’m just one reader–I could be totally off base.
August 29, 2012 — 8:17 AM
R Thomas Allwin says:
That short story and the way it’s read is brilliant — great advertisment for the character and base setting of the story. Personally, I wasn’t too keen on the animated text, though. Seemed bland and boring for the most part, distracting from the words. Had I not already been sold on Blackbirds, this would possibly have peaked my interest. The story is perfect for ‘explaining’ Miriam — better even than the introduction we get in the book, with Del Amico.
Using video to sell text is tricky. In this case, I would’ve interspersed the text with images: bleak landscapes; dark settings…a flock of dark birds taking flight. No characters, though.
I haven’t seen many book trailers, though — I try to avoid them, because I can’t see how thwey are worth the time. I’d rather just read reviews.
August 29, 2012 — 8:25 AM
terribleminds says:
@R. Thomas —
Do you find reviews worthwhile? This may demand a later blog post about what book promo works and what doesn’t.
— c.
August 29, 2012 — 8:40 AM
Alexa Muir says:
Really like this trailer Chuck – the text effects are cool and it’s good getting something like a short story in a trailer. The only thing I’d say is it felt a little long, but it was enjoyable so it still works.
I once bought a book on kindle after watching the trailer: Jenny Pox by J. L. Bryan. The trailer is only 34 seconds, has very high production values and gives an excellent (and accurate) taste of the tone of the book. I would likely not have bought the book otherwise if I’m honest as I’d never heard of the writer and thought it might just be yet another schlocky YA book. The trailer convinced me to take a chance on it and I’ve now read all the books out in the series and waiting impatiently for the next one.
I think if trailers are true to the book (and are done professionally) then they can be enough to swing someone to give a book a go and to spread the word about it. But only if it’s a good trailer!
August 29, 2012 — 8:57 AM
Chris Devlin says:
Chuck,
I have a notoriously hard time getting into book trailers. I’m not sure why; might have something to do with being such a movie fan and such a fan of a well-made movie trailer that I simply can’t switch gears. Most book trailers are too long, too literal and just boring for me. And the words never pass by at the right rate. They’re usually too slow. I can read much faster than they can piecemeal them out to me so why not just read it?
Your trailer is one of the best I’ve seen, and yet… I found the blipping-around text to be really distracting. Maybe if it was just the man reading the words, because he does have a great voice, with some images in the background. I dunno. But I think I would have enjoyed that more just reading the words in a blurb, like in the olden days of bookselling. Render unto books that advertising which belongs to books; render unto movies that unique form of advertising called the movie trailer.
I seriously sound old, don’t I?As to whether this book trailer was effective at making me want to read the book… It’s hard to say because I’ve already been turned on by the more traditional advertising you’ve done on the Miriam books. It’s a great concept and I guess this trailer sells it. But how many writers can really afford this kind of quality? And as you said in your blog post there’s nothing worse than a cheap, ill-conceived book trailer.
I will say, as for whether you can track the effectiveness of the book trailer, I’m not sure that’s the final gauge on whether book marketing is effective. I think writers these days are doing all kinds of book marketing and it’s really difficult to tell what medium is working and what’s a waste of time.
Anyway, thanks for bringing up the subject and it really is a great trailer. I’m just not sure we need it, or any book trailers really. Sorry.
August 29, 2012 — 9:48 AM
Nicki says:
This was good. I liked the voice, and it gives me a real feel for the book and the character. I think you could definitely call this a success.
August 29, 2012 — 9:49 AM
Nicki Hill says:
I avoid book trailers like the plague, exactly because I don’t want an A/V medium influencing my thoughts on a text medium. Trailers are for movies and TV shows, not books. IMO.
I like to read reviews sometimes, especially on places like Amazon where the synopsis isn’t always right there or in-depth enough for me to get a feel for the book, but I can’t say they influence my purchasing decisions, either. For me, it’s gotta be a hooky synopsis combined with catchy writing/effortless reading for at least the first couple of pages that does it.
August 29, 2012 — 9:52 AM
Shiri Sondheimer says:
I was already sold on Mockingbirds, but if I hadn’t been, the AUDIO trailer would have sold me. I loved the story as well, felt that it gave me just enough without tipping your (or Miriam’s) hand.
The visuals were gorgeous, but for me, didn’t ADD much. It was neat to watch and the stark/minimal nature of the thing matches the sensibility really well, but I didn’t NEED it. There were actually I few times I closed my eyes and just listened.
August 29, 2012 — 10:06 AM
Jo Eberhardt says:
It’s one of the best book trailers I’ve seen. Is “freaking awesome” considered polite?
In saying that, though, I loved the story and the audio of the trailer, but found the text distracting. Possibly it’s just me, because I’m very severely not visual, but the text moving around and flipping and changing directions kept distracting me from the words being said.
Like many other people, though, I don’t generally watch book trailers. (Again — not visual.) I enjoyed this one, though, and it has 100% reaffirmed my desire to read your books. I probably just wouldn’t have watched it if I wasn’t already interested.
As for other good trailers… As I said, I haven’t watched many, but I was quite taken by the trailer for Machine Man by Max Barry:
http://youtu.be/kEN10axDJtA
August 29, 2012 — 10:20 AM
David Hadley says:
I read Blackbirds and… well, let’s say we didn’t get on, me and Miriam. Maybe that and the fact that I don’t like adverts in any shape or form doesn’t make me the ideal person to comment on something like your trailer, but I don’t see why that should stop me pontificating….
I don’t like the trailer either.
Mostly it is the way the background moves around like a drunkard’s walk – makes me feel seasick.
The voice – yes, the voice is good, but the words falling around like some sort of random word-Tetris game, get in the way of the voice.
I stopped listening, reading, watching half-way through.
I think that was my problem: I’m watching, I’m reading and I’m listening – it’s all too much of a thing.
But what the hell do I know?
Good luck.. I hope it works for you.
August 29, 2012 — 10:21 AM
terribleminds says:
Interesting that some of you don’t like it — or don’t find much in the visual part of it.
For my mileage, the text with the audio was like a one-two punch. I mean, I say that as the writer — but there I wrote some okay bullshit text and I feel like Dan and Alan really kicked them through the goalposts. I like the movement of the words — I read along as I go in much the same way that I’d read a book — but I’m a fan of kinetic text in general. I like the little plays on the visuals (a handprint, a cloud of blood, words toppling off the end as it indicates tumbling off the end of the Reaper’s dick).
As for someone who said it could’ve ended after the “I won the bet” — it could have, and I almost had it end there. My worry was that this is meant to be connected to but also separate from the books. It appears in neither book — it’s a short fiction piece all its own. So, to end there makes Miriam look callous. Like, “Hey, fuck you, thanks for the money.” I needed her sitting with him for a while. I needed that sense of compassion, grim and twisted as it is, from her.
Glad some folks dug it. If you did, spread it around if you’re cool with doing that.
— c.
August 29, 2012 — 10:28 AM
terribleminds says:
Also, don’t forget to indicate trailers you liked (or actively disliked) other than this one. I want to crack the nut on book trailers in general, not just my two attempts.
— c.
August 29, 2012 — 10:28 AM
Ashes says:
The problem I have with book trailers isn’t that they’re good or bad or any of that. (In fact, yours here was quite good. I’m a big fan of the kinetic use of words in book trailers; I found that more arresting than the voice itself, though that guy does have it going on. The characters, for their brevity, are really compelling.)
It’s that I file away Internet video as something to watch once, have an appropriate reaction to, and then forget about. I’ve seen a couple really gorgeous book trailers and a couple amusing ones, and I’ve never come to the end going, “Ye~s, I must read right fucking now.” I sort of just shrug and move on to the next cat meme. (Ahahahaha sumo cat, you’re hilarious.)
So, I don’t know if the greatest book trailer in the world could work past my apathy toward Internet video.
August 29, 2012 — 10:47 AM
Patricia Lynne says:
Honestly, I’m not much of a fan of book trailers. Most of them do bore me. Which is funny because I absolutely love to make them. I don’t use live action and they aren’t over the top, but I try to find the right images, write a compelling script and suitable music. Have any of the ones I’ve made help me sell my books? Not really. One person bought my first book after I showed the trailer, but the music ended up being copy righted so I had to find new music that wasn’t as good. On occasion I do see other trailers that I enjoyed, but none have made me want to go out and buy the book ASAP.
August 29, 2012 — 11:23 AM
Gareth says:
I must be an oddity. (Shaddap. I can HEAR you, Wendig.)
I see commentary on Twitter about people not diggin’ on book trailers and I totally don’t get it. Especially the whole “it’s selling a movie of the book, not the book” angle.
Maybe it’s because I’m a dirty, dirty transmedia fetishist, but to me the trailer is selling me on the WORLD. I view the book as just one of the delivery methods (maybe the only one that currently exists, but still).
August 29, 2012 — 11:25 AM
Susie Lindau (@Susie says:
I LOVED this and the graphics. I was drawn right in.
I could see you doing books on tape. Have you considered that?
I didn’t want the trailer to end…
August 29, 2012 — 11:37 AM
Alex Beecroft says:
I thought it was a really good book trailer, even though it convinced me that the book was not for me. It gave me a very strong feeling of the tone and style of the book – that is, if the book is noir-ish, darkish, world-weary cynical fantasy with some interesting word play. But although I like interesting word play, the rest of it is not my cup of tea.
August 29, 2012 — 11:37 AM
Susie Lindau (@Susie says:
I just read the other comments and am surprised! I am a visual person and artist so maybe that is the difference. Still, it was my honest opinion. I say “go for it!”
The only other consideration would be your target age group. I’ll show it to my son who is in college. He’ll be honest….I bet the younger people will love it since graphics “falling around” keeps them interested…
August 29, 2012 — 11:42 AM
Josh Gentry says:
One more vote for fantastic audio, but the animated text was distracting and didn’t work for me.
The profanity trailer is fun. Really good to see someone experimenting with these.
August 29, 2012 — 12:34 PM
Josh Gentry says:
Oh, other book trailer I liked. Very cinematic. I suppose it could fall under better ad for the movie of the book than the book, but it worked for me. I bought the book, and loved it.
The Drowning Girl – Trailer http://youtu.be/pSLbcvc2xLs
August 29, 2012 — 1:03 PM
Sandra Lindsey says:
Book trailers? First one I ever saw was years ago – a friend of mine made one for her new novel. I was all “ooh, concept I’ve not heard of before!” and then “meh, whatever!”
Second book trailer I watched was the one you embedded in this post – I watched it yesterday, and it grabbed me, and I loved it and wanted to watch it over & over – and I’m also trying to figure out how to make someone else buy me copies of your books (because I’m skint and feel guilty for weeks if I indulge myself by buying something purely because I want it – but I digress…)
Your other book trailer, with you reading / speaking? Not for me. Just didn’t grab me at all. I watched a bit but… I’m totally not your target audience with that!
So, thinking on why I liked the other one so much, and why I watched it in the first place: because it’s a story. I very much doubt that story will be available anywhere else, and the whole reason I’m keen on reading and writing in the first place is to feed my need for stories. So, yeah, tell a story to sell a story seems to work with me. Like you say, Alan Stewart’s voice is just perfect for that story – and have the words animated in the way they are just grabs you harder and makes it stick.
I guess it wouldn’t work if you did it all the time, but if you were looking for doing the same thing all the time you’d be flipping burgers or doing accounts or something like that, wouldn’t you?
August 29, 2012 — 1:41 PM
Dustin Hansen says:
I think this works – but I’m not sure how well. For me, writing like this helps me trust you as a writer, however, without reading your blog post, I wouldn’t know for sure if you wrote it – or if it was written by a marketing group. Ya know. In the end, I personally think the cuss word trailer has more potential.
For me, trusting a writer is huge when it comes to purchasing books (all purchases actually). I need to know that you’ll take me somewhere as a writer that I can’t go on my own. This is why I’m also a habitual book buyer – if I like and author, I’m generally there for life. This trailer gets me down that path – I’m interested and I’d keep digging to find out more about your books – no doubt.
IMO – the best book trailers can be used as the digital equivalent of word of mouth. I think the focus on book trailers should be changed to – Will my current readers share this trailer with potential new readers? I think another aspect of a good trailer is one that can show the reader that the writer has personality and that their personality will leak into their writing. Julie Klam is wonderful at this. Here are two of her trailers that nail this IMO.
Youtube videos are easy to share – very little friction there. Focusing on sharable, social videos that NEW readers would find engaging can be effective – but measuring that effectiveness is a whole new story.
I say – the focus of most book trailers is a bit off. Make your videos viral (sure, that’s easy) – let that drive curiosity to your work, and that’s why I would say you reading the cuss words is a more effective trailer than the polished story version. Just my .02.
August 29, 2012 — 2:10 PM
terribleminds says:
You know, you people are really busting my bubble on this trailer over here.
— c.
August 29, 2012 — 2:15 PM
Dustin Hansen says:
Sorry – forgot to link to the Julie Klam trailers. Two very different approaches, but both are effective. Of course, knowing Timothy Hutton doesn’t hurt her here at all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpuX3hsjegY
August 29, 2012 — 2:11 PM
Philip Nobert says:
Just as not every book is for every reader, neither is every trailer for every viewer. Video on the web continues to grow at a staggering pace and as the quality improves (like Chuck here’s very solid trailer) audiences find this stuff and subscribe to the channels (authors, self- pubbers, legacy, etc.) they like, expecting more. This is branding. It takes time. Rinse + Repeat. That said, it’s easier than ever to watch a trailer or an author Q&A or read a review, and scoop up the book in real time without ever having to jump off the couch. Somebody told me recently that the biggest enemy of the book industry is the growing group of non-readers. You can bet they’re watching video and if a sticky trailer they see on their mobile phone helps bring ’em back to the book, win-win. Meantime make quality trailers. Keep ’em simple. They’re not movie trailers. Some will be better than others. And put yourself in front of the camera, especially if you’re funny like Chuck. Mix it up. And over time your author brand will have grown across myriad channels…leading to fans and sales. It’s a kung-fu hustle. Have at it!
August 29, 2012 — 2:24 PM
UrsulaV says:
My publisher commissioned book trailers for a couple of my books. I have no idea whether they had any impact on sales. They were cute and cartoony and may have appealed to the target 8-12 year old audience, I dunno. It’s hard to get data on stuff like that.
Have never watched a book trailer in my life (other than those, for obvious reasons.) and still honestly think the whole concept is a bit weird. I have no idea why they became a thing. I think I still believe it’s a fad that will die quickly, and can’t imagine commissioning or doing one myself. Cinematography is a skill set. I have lots of skills, but cannot convince myself that’s one of them.
Then again, I am wrong more often than I know, so maybe book trailers really are the Wave Of The Future.
August 29, 2012 — 2:30 PM
Angie says:
This is the first book trailer that would ever have convinced me to buy a book (if I hadn’t already bought it). The text wasn’t distracting for me; I thought it was well done, and the voice (both the “voice” of the writing and the actual, audible voice) was fantastic.
I *despise* book trailers that have actual people in them, whether as photos or actors performing part of the book. I read a book because I want to come up with my own picture of the characters and world; if I wanted that done for me, I’d watch a movie.
August 29, 2012 — 2:38 PM
Philip Nobert says:
Don’t be discouraged Chuck. You did good. Quite well actually. Keep at it. And forget the shitty ‘book trailer’ term. It creates an expectation that cannot possibly be met. Call it a book blurb or book video or book wheel of cheese. Doesn’t matter just keep pushing. These things aren’t the stuff of the future. Good video on the web is very much right now…and growing…especially as consumers and devices and viewing (see reading) habits continue to evolve.
August 29, 2012 — 2:47 PM
Josh Gentry says:
I was thinking about trailer 2. For me, most of the problem is that the text is too quick, making it distracting from the audio. It has to be if all the text of the story is going to be there. Would work better for this viewer if it was only some of the text, fading in and out more slowly. You could still have the cool effects like the hand print. Choose the text strategically, instead of using all of it. Just a thought.
August 29, 2012 — 3:02 PM
R.A. Williamson says:
Overall I thought the trailer was great–and definitely would make me interested in buying the book (if I hadn’t already, which I have). The voice acting was prime, and I loved the script, but I have to admit I’m not a huge fan of the animated typography used in the trailer. (Full disclosure: I work in the creative advertising industry, and far too closely with interaction designers, so I suffer from overexposure to distressed, flying block letters. YMMV.)
I’ve skipped through a few book trailers before, but most don’t grab me (the trailer for “Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters” might be an exception). Maybe if they were scored by Carl Orff they’d be more compelling. Orff makes anything dramatic.
All of that said, I’m not part of the FaceTube generation, so maybe the whole concept is lost on me. A well designed cover and a sample page or two is generally enough to piqued my interest and entice me to fork over my money.
Did I mention I loved the script?
(Incidentally, my corporate network always blocks O’Shea’s site as “Pornography.”)
August 29, 2012 — 3:03 PM
Steven Chapman says:
I think it’s great, it advertises the book, gives an idea of plot and character without spoiling the whole premise. I enjoyed the visual and audio side and thought the mix worked well – I’m a big fan of kinetic typography and I think reading along with something that is being read out by someone else can add a touch of connectivity that you don’t get with audio alone. When it’s just a voice you disconnect and your mind wanders, maybe racing to imagine every last detail and then you miss the punch of the words. With the text you focus doubly so on what is being said and it anchors you to the words, drives them deeper into your skull. Keep up the good work, Chuck!
August 29, 2012 — 3:06 PM
Jason L Blair says:
I love this trailer. By far, one of the best I’ve seen. O’Shea’s delivery is great, the animations on the flowing text are clever, and the writing is tight. I also dig that it isn’t selling me one book directly but it’s selling me on Miriam and then telling me how to learn more about her.
I’ve watched this trailer multiple times and love it more each time.
August 29, 2012 — 3:08 PM
sj says:
What makes an effective book trailer? Or an ineffective one?
This is a difficult question to answer. I’m not really likely to watch the trailers for books I’m not already interested in. I like what you’ve done here – writing a completely new story, but which sums up Miriam’s world nicely. Also, dude’s voice is all Waits-y and gravel-y and I adore that.
What are some book trailers you’ve liked?
Other than these? No, seriously, not sucking up – I’m generally not a fan, like I said I don’t generally watch a trailer unless it’s a book I’m already intending to buy.
Have you ever been convinced to buy a book via the trailer?
Nope. But I’ve shared these around, and I’m hoping they convince a few people to check your work out. Miriam is fantastic.
What are some particularly bad ones you’ve seen (if you care to share)?
This is probably the worst one I’ve seen. (and the cover causes me to dissolve into a fit of giggles, so I’m sure that didn’t help at all)
August 29, 2012 — 3:28 PM
Stephanie M. Lorée says:
It works great. Very compelling. It’s exactly what I want from a book trailer, a mini-story that entices me to read the larger one.
The voice acting is fantastic as well.
Oh, and the profanity one is humorous, but I think the flash-audio-mash-whatever is far more encouraging to buy the book. If, of course, I hadn’t already purchased it. Which, I have. 🙂
August 29, 2012 — 3:31 PM
Todd Lucas says:
You know, I don’t think I’ve ever looked at a book trailer before, but I figured, gotcha on my reader, might as well take a look. I thought it was a fantastic experience. Makes me want to read the books anymore. However, I was kinda left wondering if that was in fact, a “trailer”. I was kinda lead to believe by that word that book trailers were in fact, things that looked like movie trailers, which is why had avoided them till now, for the very reasons you state. I’ll know who the characters are when I read the book, thank you very much. I certainly don’t want the author’s best bud or neighbor or some college kid ruining a good read for me, right?
So, I was kinda stoked by that one, and knew you’d put the curing one up so I gave it a view. I’m going to advise against that in the future, unfortunately. It just came across as cute. All that creative vulgarity and all I was thinking afterwards was “Aww, he’s just such a fwuffy cuddeewy witteew wendigo.” Sorry.
Tell you’re boy O’shea he’s certainly got a voice. It had an undesired effect (undesired by me, anyway) on my wife, too. Guess I was just too dense to see that as a “sexy male voice” before I shared ;-p Anyway, if he can sing at all with that voice, he needs to look into gigs doing back up for studio recordings. I know of a guy that sounds like this (looks like it sounds, too, complete with flannel and bibs), that is so highly sought after for particular types of tracks, that I hear him pop up with alot of my favorite artists.
Whatever though, good friend to have around, he did a great job and completely meshed with Mr. Stewart’s direction and design work. I’m a long time rehabilitating design snob, and I was totally sold on the visuals right off the bad. I’m going to guess that the word ordering and direction choices that are sometimes nonstandard might grate on some people, but I thought it was totally cool. Mr. Steward had a good sense of when just text, making the same or similar moves might start loosing viewers and changed up nicely with nonstandard word placement tricks.
Good stuff, though unless I can get things personally verified by people I trust, I don’t imagine I’ll turn into a book trailer enthusiast anytime soon. I will be reading Mockingbird soon, though.
August 29, 2012 — 3:33 PM
Corinne says:
Your delivery in the profanity trailer gave me a real laugh on a shitty day, and I really love the flashfic trailer as a weird-wonderful little piece of art from Miriam’s universe… but, then, I pre-ordered Mockingbird back in April.
Trying to put myself in the headspace of somebody new to the series, I might have been pulled in by either (or by the contrast of both), but I’m not sure I would ever have seen them if I weren’t already here on a near-daily basis to put your bloggerel in my eyeholes. On the other hand, there are probably people who’ve come across the trailers through twitter or wherever else they trawl for videos, who’ll engage with Miriam and even buy the book, but won’t necessarily make over here to chime in on this or any other post.
I honestly can’t think of a book trailer I’ve watched that wasn’t for a book I was already sold on, but this is exactly the kind of thing I eat up (and share when I’m feeling sociable) when I’m anticipating a new story/new installment. Tasty food for a fandom, just like the tumblr and the fanart contest. I don’t know how you’d gauge the trailers’ effectiveness with new potential readers, but as a treat for, and to fire up, existing fans? Success!
August 29, 2012 — 3:55 PM
Carrie says:
I have never watched a book trailer, yours is the first. I didn’t see what the point and all your concerns brought up would be mine. Do I really want readers picturing whatever actor I get to play the characters instead of using their imaginations based on what I write?
I can’t see this method of advertising making me want to read a book more…but I did enjoy yours and I am doubly intrigued about the book 🙂
August 29, 2012 — 4:01 PM
Chris Lites says:
I’ve seen a lot of book trailers. I’ve made similar things to book trailers for other purposes. This is well done and conveys what you want. Anyone who says otherwise hates freedom and America.
August 29, 2012 — 4:31 PM
Ken Preston says:
Never seen a book trailer I liked…until now.
August 29, 2012 — 5:21 PM
R Thomas Allwin says:
I do find reviews worthwhile if they’re from a source I know, trust, or have faith in: traditional media, friends, and authors I’m familiar with are the safest bets for me, then online reviewers I am familiar with, and lastly online reviewers who’s taste and opinion I’ve been able to determine through their reviews of other things I’ve read.
How the review is written – language, style, spelling – is also very important to me. If I like the voice of the reviewer, chances are I might like what she enjoys reading.
I rarely (if ever…) go by what random buyers say.
I can see a niche for book trailers like this one, however, if they are well-integrated into social media, or if they are part of transmedial work.
August 29, 2012 — 5:36 PM
J.M. Dow says:
My 2 cents: your trailers (both of them) were awesome.
I feel like the swear words trailer was more selling YOU than it was your book. It was basically selling your personality and your voice.
The second one was selling the character and the concept.
I like kinetic type videos. And I feel that if your going to sell text, you should probably use text. It wasn’t just dull words over a backdrop. It was a moving, interesting, engaging thing to watch and read along with while the grizzled voice read. So, it was one of the most effective book trailers I’ve ever seen.
I agree with what others have said, a book trailer with real actors is often selling the movie version of the book. The trailer for Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter — the book — was one of the best book trailers I’ve ever seen…because I wanted to watch the movie.
I usually get really interested and intrigued by book trailers because I think they’re going to be some interesting, cool new movie, only to be disappointed when it’s “only a book.” And you’re right, the ones without actors in it are often amateurish and/or boring.
August 29, 2012 — 7:12 PM
Natalie says:
I won’t watch any video longer than about 30 seconds. I can read so much faster than people speak that I get bored and impatient waiting for the next words. I watched the first couple of lines, saw 2.31 minutes, thought “nah”.
I’d much rather read this short piece in my own time. Or read reviews of any length.
August 29, 2012 — 7:32 PM
terribleminds says:
@Natalie —
In this case, the short piece is only going to be here, in the video. I don’t intend to publish the script — I think this particular transmedia artifact is exactly where I want it to be in terms of words, voice, text, and animation. Comprising a whole feel, if you will.
— c.
August 29, 2012 — 7:57 PM
terribleminds says:
I think someone hit on something that the kinetic text trailer isn’t really a trailer at all, and maybe it’s a misnomer to even call it that.
I think @Gareth is right that this leans more toward transmedia than anything else. It’s a new tale, a new style, a new medium for the character — maybe that’s the way to look at it.
Maybe that’s the way to look at all “book trailers.”
— c.
August 29, 2012 — 7:58 PM
AlishaKlapheke says:
I liked it. I liked it a lot. I want to love book trailers, but I’m with you–most suck a great deal. I enjoyed the movement of the text. Very original. I’d cut it a little if at all possible. My favorite book trailer award goes to Maggie Stiefvater. If you haven’t seen her stop animation cut outs for Shiver, Linger, or Forever, watch them. Even if you hate her writing (she’s my favorite, so I’ll plug my ears during nasty comments), you might appreciate her trailers. She does the art herself. Anyway, yay for your trailer. It is entertaining. It is words. It makes me want to read your book. And, most of all, it doesn’t have terrible actors in it.
August 29, 2012 — 8:45 PM
churnage says:
Great voiceover, nice dirty text.
Cool little vignette… worked for me.
Suggestion for a future plot twist in the series: You probably already thought of this, but what the hey… sometime in the future, she gets it wrong. Somebody is immune to her telekinetic powers and it has consequences. Bad consequences.
August 29, 2012 — 9:20 PM
decaying orbits says:
I honestly don’t have an opinion on “book trailers” one way or another. That said, I enjoyed your trailer and it has intrigued me enough to want to read the book.
I suppose that is the purpose, eh?
I really dug the transposition of voice over text, but I’m more of an audio/visual type, so that construct resonates with me.
I honestly don’t think some sort of corny mini-movie-trailer would’ve had the same impact. When I read a book, I want to choose in my mind what the characters look like (within the bounds of how the author describes them). I also want to choose the voices, but in this case the voice was excellent, and not a distraction.
I liked it. For other readers, YMMV.
August 29, 2012 — 11:02 PM
Daniel says:
I think this Trailer is pretty effective but could be better. I love the voice. It’s a seasoned, well-worn, earthy voice that sounds like it has stories to tell and I want to hear them. Great choice. The graphics are a little bit busy for my taste. It worked better the second time I watched it, but the first time it felt a bit distracting – I wasn’t sure what to focus on. It took a few moments for the eye/ear coordination to hone in on the rhythm of the piece. The grey/black background is fairly cold, bordering on industrial and doesn’t really match the mood of the story. It comes off darker than I think was intended. What’s lacking, in my opinion, is a better sense of “feel” and “place.” It’s emotionally distant and I think a slight change would help the viewer better understand the mood I’m guessing you intended with the story. I know you said no music but the right piece of music behind this would guide the audience a bit and make them connect emotionally with the story as well. Here’s what I would put in the background: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6ymVaq3Fqk I know, you can most likely not get that piece of music, but something like this that matches the earthiness of the voice and provides a bit of warmth and emotion. As it is now, it feels a bit cold. Start the two YouTube videos at the same time and watch the trailer with this music in the background and you’ll see what I mean.
August 29, 2012 — 11:24 PM
Daniel says:
I think this Trailer is pretty effective but could be better. I love the voice. It’s a seasoned, well-worn, earthy voice that sounds like it has stories to tell and I want to hear them. Great choice. The graphics are a little bit busy for my taste. It worked better the second time I watched it, but the first time it felt a bit distracting – I wasn’t sure what to focus on. It took a few moments for the eye/ear coordination to hone in on the rhythm of the piece.
The grey/black background is fairly cold, bordering on industrial and doesn’t really match the mood of the story. It comes off darker than I think was intended. What’s lacking, in my opinion, is a better sense of “feel” and “place.” It’s emotionally distant and I think a slight change would help the viewer better understand the mood I’m guessing you intended with the story. I know you said no music but the right piece of music behind this would guide the audience a bit and make them connect emotionally with the story as well.
Here’s what I would put in the background: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6ymVaq3Fqk I know, you can most likely not get that piece of music, but something like this that matches the earthiness of the voice and provides a bit of warmth and emotion. As it is now, it feels a bit cold. Start the two YouTube videos at the same time and watch the trailer with this music in the background and you’ll see what I mean.
August 30, 2012 — 12:08 AM
Imelda Evans says:
I’d kiss you better if I thought it would reinflate your bubble and if I was closer. But since I’m not, I’ll give you an honest opinion and hope it isn’t deflational.
First, I liked it – egads, but what a whiskey and cigarettes voice and a way with a story yon lad has! I would happily listen to that voice reading the phone book, so more than full marks for that. I also liked the text, I thought it was cool and much more interesting than stock images could ever be. It also showed the input of someone with some ideas about and skill with design, which is a refreshing change.
Now, having said that, some ideas.
The first is that I think you might be right and it might not be a book trailer, exactly. It’s a great little story in its own right, about the main character of the books. I think that’s a fantastic way to promote your Miriam books, but it isn’t what most people mean by a book trailer and perhaps your very creativity will get in the way of it being effective.
If you marketed it as a promotional extra or a teaser, making clear that it was a separate short story I think it would avoid confusion and I think it would work better. A book trailer sounds like advertising, it sounds boring (to me, based on experience) and it sounds like you are asking ME for something (my time). A bonus slice or glimpse of Miriam sounds intriguing, fun and as though you are GIVING me something. Which you absolutely are, here, having gone to the trouble to write a little story and produce it so well.
It’s all about the way you present it and the expectation that raises.
I have another suggestion, too. Since the audio of this piece is so amazing, you might want to consider producing it as a straight audio file as well. It may seem silly, when you can have the visual, not to, but while, for me the appeal of the video is mostly in the first viewing, the audio will continue to appeal many times over. I am a storyteller (in the oral tradition) so maybe I am more tuned to the audio than some, but I can’t believe I’m completely alone. And if you are offering it as a bonus, or gift, it just makes you look more generous to have it available in more than one format.
As a book trailer, the sweary one is probably better because it is directly about the book.
It’s different, creative and funny without being so different that it is confusing or off-putting. As a promo piece, I think this one is amazing and as something to watch, I personally prefer it. As a book trailer, though, it’s probably too creative for the current market. Maybe that will change.
I hope that all made sense! You know I wish you only good things. Mwah!
August 30, 2012 — 12:42 AM
Vic DiGital says:
This is a fascinating question for me, as a professional film and video producer and aspiring writer. A few times over the last few years (ever since seeing the “Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters” trailer, which was awesome), I’ve been intrigued by the concept of book trailers and have discussed them at length with my writing group. On the surface, you’d THINK that a cinematic trailer is in the exact same wheelhouse as a movie trailer or videogame trailer. A visual presentation of the characters, plot, or tone of a book. But except for a handful (if your hand could only hold three), every trailer I’ve seen has been an abomination. They are almost all missing something. As a filmmaker, my thought was to do full-on movie trailer style trailers, with actual dialogue from the book, hollywood-style soundtrack, the works. Anything but another slow dirge of a trailer with vague, somber music and text… that… appears…. soo… slowly… phrase.. by… phrase…
Many people commenting here talk about how they despise the very idea of a book trailer, but I think it’s because they just have never seen one that’s right for this type of product. Using the rationale of “I don’t want actors influencing my imagination’s version of the character” is silly, because book covers do exactly that. Some are more cartoony, like the Harry Potter ones, but many nowadays utilize photography, especially paranormal romance and YA. So it’s not THAT. If anything, the right visuals on a cover totally prepare the mind’s eye for a story. I’ve seen tons of Elric of Melnibone cover art, but the one that sticks in my brain (and inspired me to read the books ultimately) was Robert Gould’s iconic stylizing.
(ETA, Let’s not forget the greatest book trailer EVER, HBO’s Game of Thrones series. When done right, specific actors, visuals, etc, have massive positive impact on the books. When I read the books now, I only see the HBO actors in my head, and I have NO problem with that, even though they are almost all much older or described differently in the books. Tyrion IS Peter Dinklage, despite the fact that Dinklage isn’t a misshapen, two-eye-colored mess. Actual mileage may vary, and I suspect many of the people posting in this thread will likely have turned their noses up at the HBO adaptation, or ANY adaptation of a literary work. But judging from the insane sales of the ASOIAF books since the HBO series began, I’ll venture to say that the vast majority of readers have no problem seeing the HBO actors in their mind’s eye (or the Harry Potter or LOTR movie actors in their mind’s eye for that matter.) So it’s not THIS issue, either.
Much of it is as Chuck mentioned, that one or more of the elements are not just amateurish, but unentertainingly so. The second-most egregious sin is that they are all WAY TOO LONG. My day job is making TV commercials, and even thirty seconds sometimes feels like it drags. Unless you have stunningly compelling content, a minute or two minutes or two and a half minutes (the apparent “sweet spot” for book trailers) feels like an eternity.
Of the ones posted in this thread, all but one of them were inert. Julie Klam’s animated trailer was very compelling and makes me want to possibly read the book. However, the trailer was way too long. If I hadn’t been watching it as part of this discussion, I probably wouldn’t have stayed to the end. But it was effective because it really did (I presume) let me know what the voice or tone of the book was going to be. I have a good idea what to expect.
That brings me to the Blackbirds/Mockingbird trailer. I have to say that I really liked it. It was too long, but not a deal-killer like most book trailers. I love that I really felt like I was getting a feel for the story. The fact that it’s a stand-alone story from the books is irrelevant, even though I totally understand why you did it that way and wanted to make it clear. The fact is that not having read any of the books yet, I’d have no way of knowing or caring that this was a standalone story as opposed to a semi-complete excerpt from one of the books themselves. Your discussion of it being ‘transmedia’ is accurate, but this video is a trailer because it has a definite call to action at the end of it. “Buy my book!” In general transmedia terms, I think that EVERY writer should have gobs of transmedia content available, be it (good) book trailers, video skits (like Julie Klam’s Tim Hutton video), video interviews, podcasts, etc. etc. I only know about you, Chuck, because SF Signal so often links to your very entertaining articles. All of it works together to make the Chuck experience something fun. I haven’t read any of your books yet, but this book trailer, in conjunction with everything else, is moving you to the top of my (very long) list of “Books/authors to read eventually”.
Specifically about your trailer, the kinetic text is just a personal taste sort of thing, and some people (obviously, from the response in here) have a very negative opinion of it. I personally like it, and have used something similar in several projects, to varying degrees of success. The background jitter could be minimized, but the overall effect is very fun, and did a great job of reinforcing the text while at the same time reinforcing that this is a written story this video is promoting. And it was too long by about a minute. After the first minute, I got the idea of what this story world was about and was ready to move on. It was entertaining all the way to the end, and for someone familiar with your story already, the length wouldn’t have been a problem. It works GREAT as bonus content. But for a teaser for the books, it could have been shorter.
In general, I think the short story as dramatized text is a brilliant way of approaching a book trailer. I’d especially think that perhaps a series of three four one-minute POV stories featuring characters from a book would be effective. Have each character talk about one of the other characters in whatever the most intense emotion they have for that character, be it love, hate, admiration, contempt, etc. These are all the sorts of things we do as writing exercises or brainstorming or for busting out of a writing slump. Just do the same thing introducing your characters in a pseudo-official way. It’s not directly FROM the book, but it’s OF the book.
Granted, doing any book trailer that’s worth anything will take time, talent, equipment, money, or a friend from your writing group who happens to own a video production company. I don’t know that it’s ever going to be WORTH the investment if you have to make one (so this is definitely NOT a sales pitch). But if done right, I think they can be an effective part of your overall strategy.
August 30, 2012 — 4:29 AM
Grady Hendrix says:
Here’s the book trailer I did for the comic book cookbook my wife and I just released via Clarkson Potter. The number one tip for good book trailers? Animation. Also, talking vegetables. And maybe a flying unicorn.
August 30, 2012 — 6:25 AM
Cari Hislop says:
I think your book trailer is freaking brilliant. I read the free first fifty pages of Mockingbird the other day and the blackbirds have been pecking at my brain ever since. The only thing holding me back from buying a copy was the present tense (which I usually find too intense), but after watching your trailer (twice) the blackbirds are crowing! I’ll have to buy a copy so that makes your trailer effective in my case. At first I thought the voice was you reading and that threw me off because it doesn’t sound like you look, but then the tired remains of my brain (picked over by rooks and ravens) cottoned on and I realized it was a character; that it was a story outside the story; that you were introducing Miriam. I wish I’d thought of it.
Most of the trailers I’ve seen have been very very ineffective. I hate movie-trailers for books. Like you, I don’t want to know what some stupid editor thinks the character looks like. And if a book is set in some other era…how hard is it to get the freaking clothes right? It gives me nightmarish flashbacks to Halloweens spent working in a costume shop where people thought by putting on a gunnysack dress from the 70’s they could look like a Renaissance princess. It’s a personal problem.
I like how you avoided ruining our vision of the character by simply using words without any other visuals or background music. I’m sick to death of the whole background emotive musac. It just makes me hate whoever is trying to manipulate my emotions.
August 30, 2012 — 8:39 AM