I knew a guy named Gil who faced an incredibly difficult decision: his wife and his teenage daughter were both in the hospital at the same time with failing kidneys, the wife from cancer, the daughter from the trauma of a car accident. Grim coincidence, indeed. Both required a kidney transplant, both put on the list requiring donor organs. But Gil, of course, was a perfect match for his daughter, and as it so happened, also for his wife. Trick is, Gil only had two kidneys — he wasn’t like, loaded down with extra fucking kidneys, so he could only give one away. He could give a kidney to his wife, or he could give the organ to his daughter. The one whom he refused would be consigned to wait, ideally getting a kidney from a donor, but that person could also potentially die in the interim.
This was complicated by, well, complications. His wife was older, in her 40s, so was it wiser to give the kidney to his daughter, who had so much more life to live? But the daughter also had other trauma from the accident, and a kidney would not entirely ‘fix’ her — whereas the wife’s cancer had not yet metastasized, and so his kidney would go a greater distance, so to speak, if transplanted into her. Then one wonders, what are the emotional responses? If both survive, will one resent him? Could both? If one died, what would the response be from the survivor?
Needless to say, it’s a lot to weigh.
It is a very hard choice.
Which did he choose?
Neither, because Gil isn’t fucking real. I just made him up. I don’t think anyone is even really named Gil. That’s just folklore, like Bigfoot. We’ve all told the campfire tales about CREEPY GIL THE KIDNEY DONOR, haven’t we? THE KIDNEY IS COMING FROM INSIDE THE CAR, oh no!
But really, who gives a shit? The point remains the same:
Hard choices are interesting to us. And they are interesting to us in the context of fiction, particularly. Which means they are incredibly useful to you, as an author. Hard Choices provide an excellent, versatile tool in your narrative toolbox.
(Also, I’ve gone and tattooed HARD CHOICES across the knuckles of both of my hands. Whenever I lead a writing workshop, I jump through a paper sheet of bad prose dressed in a wrestling onesie, and then I punch the air with both fists — *punch* “HARD” *punch* “CHOICES” *kicks the air* “LET’S WRITE SOME MOTHERFUCKING STORIES,” I yell. It’s really successful and you can hire me to motivate you.)
Consider, if you will —
A hard choice provides:
a) conflict, because it puts the character in conflict with herself and with whatever consequences will come
b) mystery, because we the reader do not know what the character will choose, and what calculus will lead to that choice in particular
c) drama, because it will generate scenes of discord between characters, not all of whom will be happy with the choice or the decision
d) lingering questions, because the reader will be left wondering what exactly she would have done in exactly the same situation
e) fun for you, because not only do you get to grapple with the choice on behalf of the characters, you also get to imagine how implementing this choice will make the readership squirm as if their butt is infested with pinworms
Of course, there are tricks to using hard choices in fiction, and you might find it useful to hold onto a few key guide-ropes in the process —
a) hard choices cannot exist on every page or you dull their impact, it’s not like Gil can have a LIFE OR DEATH, WIFE OR DAUGHTER, HOLY SHIT WHO GETS THE KIDNEY moment every chapter, sometimes the fiction is about building the narrative infrastructure that gets you to the hard choice
b) the choice has to be sensible in the context of the story, and the story should feel like it’s leading up to it, not that it’s dropped out of nowhere like a fucking anvil onto the reader’s head (clong)
c) it should also be tonally appropriate — if you’re writing a light-hearted comedy then suddenly switch gears to some tragic gut-ripping Sophie’s Choice, the reader will have narrative whiplash
d) the hard choice should actually be complicated — it’s all-too-easy to bunt that wiffle ball and offer the character a false hard choice, and trust me, the reader will smell your weakness like poop on a shoe; if the choice is, GIL CAN EITHER SAVE THIS BASKET OF BABIES OR HE CAN INSTEAD EAT A BURRITO, one assumes that unless Gil is a raging burrito-hound, he’ll make the right choice and skip dinner to rescue the baby-basket
e) a hard choice speaks to the character, and isn’t just external plot
f) a hard choice always, always has consequences — emotionally, yes, but also consequences that resonate outward from the world or from other characters
g) further, those consequences — the stakes (as in, what can be won, lost or incurred) — must be known at least in part before the character makes the choice
So, there you go.
Whether you’re doing NaNiWriMo or just writing a book because, goddamnit, you can, feel free to use HARD CHOICES to juice your narrative and give it some teeth-gritting oomph.
*punches the air*
HARD
*punches the air again*
CHOICES
*high-kick*
*falls down*
*breaks coccyx*
Let’s write some motherfucking stories?
P.S. that photo at the top of the post is not Gil the Kidney Guy, but rather, author Matt Wallace, whose fists are not named HARD and CHOICES but rather, LIPBALM and LOZENGE for reasons that remain utterly unknown to mankind; regardless, please be aware he is a very good writer, and he has the newest Sin du Jour book out today, Gluttony Bay, which for me is an instafuckingbuy and it should be for you, too, damnit.
* * *
DAMN FINE STORY: Mastering the Tools of a Powerful Narrative
What do Luke Skywalker, John McClane, and a lonely dog on Ho’okipa Beach have in common? Simply put, we care about them.
Great storytelling is making readers care about your characters, the choices they make, and what happens to them. It’s making your audience feel the tension and emotion of a situation right alongside your protagonist. And to tell a damn fine story, you need to understand why and how that caring happens.
Whether you’re writing a novel, screenplay, video game, or comic, this funny and informative guide is chock-full of examples about the art and craft of storytelling–and how to write a damn fine story of your own.
Out now!
Indiebound | Amazon | B&N
Eva Therese says:
Dammit. Now I want to know who got the kidney and what happened afterwards. You monster!
November 7, 2017 — 9:17 AM
terribleminds says:
bwa ha ha
November 7, 2017 — 9:21 AM
Jen Edwards says:
Hooray! Thanks for telling me about the new Sin du Jour story out (love that series, Matt Wallace is delightful). Also, you know, advice. I’d hire you to punch through some paper and motivate me, but you would startle the dogs and also, no money allocated for this in the budget. I’ll just buy your book instead. 😉
November 7, 2017 — 9:58 AM
Ed says:
Gill’s 3rd option is to give both his daughter and wife a kidney each, thus sacrificing his own life. Obviously that’s for the book with the last page tear-jerker ending.
November 7, 2017 — 10:04 AM
Matthew J Daniels says:
And here I was trying to find a link to donate my own kidney and help him out.
November 7, 2017 — 12:20 PM
Rebecca Douglass says:
You don’t have enough knuckles to tattoo “HARD CHOICES”
November 7, 2017 — 12:45 PM
Rebecca Douglass says:
…unless you do. I have long suspected the Wendigo of being some kind of mutant, because who can write so much so fast and so well?
November 7, 2017 — 12:46 PM
terribleminds says:
THE KNUCKLES CONTAIN A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF REAL ESTATE
November 8, 2017 — 7:44 AM
dougkzeigler says:
Polydactyly much, Sir Wendig the Wordsmith?
November 7, 2017 — 3:37 PM
Widdershins says:
A little known ‘Gil’ fact is that he had three kidneys, so if he’d been upfront, his wife wouldn’t’ve put a contract out on him for selling his ‘third’ to the highest bidder way back in 05 when he was a bit strapped for cash and trying to fund his expedition in search of the fabled city of Quezthcmatcan … but that’s another story. 🙂
November 8, 2017 — 5:41 PM
Sherri says:
The basic info was useful but I certainly can do without all the nasty words. None of those profane words were even remotely necessary to get across the message of the article. I question the author’s writing ability and vocabulary if he can’t write a simple how-to article without the use of gutter language. Those words might be appropriate and maybe even necessary in the stories he writes and they can be useful in writing fiction. So, Is the article fiction too? Are the vulgar words just meaningless fill words? I say, yes, because they did not serve a purpose other than to take up space..
November 14, 2017 — 2:11 PM
terribleminds says:
I know, what the fuck, right? Man, this guy.
November 15, 2017 — 7:34 AM
Toni says:
I <3 YOU TO MOTHERFUCKIN' PIECES, CHUCK!!
February 19, 2018 — 5:00 PM
terribleminds says:
THANK YOU, TONI
February 20, 2018 — 7:29 AM
Jonathan says:
Gil is actually a common name in Brazil! Hahaha
It’s curious that I just dealt with a hard choice situation while reading Les Misérables, and your description of what it provides was 100% accurate. It made me read about 70 pages at once (what is nothing for this book) just to see what the resolution would be.
January 26, 2018 — 6:30 PM