What the fuckity-snacks is wrong with you, dude?
Sorry, let me back up.
Earlier today I got a bit of hate mail — though I guess hate mail is strong, as the writer of said email was not like, threatening to murder me with a brick or anything — from what appears to be a male, adult reader of my young adult series. In particular, he read the third book in the series, which came out last week: The Harvest.
I won’t reprint the email here, but he said, and I quote, “I didn’t like that you had a main gay character reviling [sic] in a homosexual sexual relationship.” (Reveling, I guess he means?) He feels I “corrupted” the book with the presence of “gay male relationships.” He then added that he feels I was jumping on some kind of “bandwagon,” which I assume (he did not clarify) means that I was doing this to fill some kind of diversity bingo card. Finally, he concluded that it “didn’t matter” or “effect [sic] the story” that the character was gay so why include it at all?
Here is my response that I won’t actually bother sending to him, but maybe he’ll read it here:
Dear Pouty McGee:
Thank you for reading my book. That’s nice of you.
I’m sorry* the book features gay characters who love each other and engage in sex. I suppose the more pleasing alternative to you would be for the characters to suffer in loveless abandonment and quietly pray to themselves while looking directly at heterosexual pornography, but that feels fucking goofy to me, so I didn’t write it that way.
I’d much rather write characters who are nuanced and complicated and who also are free to partake in the human spectrum of love and sex and sexuality (and their opposing sides which is betrayal and breakups and the loneliness that results).
I did not do this to jump on some kind of gay male bandwagon, though I would assume that a gay male bandwagon would be a lot of fun. I love both bands and wagons very much.
That said, while I do not subscribe to the notion of diversity bingo or writing books simply to fill some kind of imaginary social justice quota, I do like to think that it’s important to write books that feature people who aren’t me because I really, really hope that my readership is not just a room full of beardo white dudes with grumpy sourpuss faces staring at each other. Diversity matters to my readership, and I don’t mean that in a salacious “equates-to-sales” way, but rather in a, “equates-to-acknowledging-the-vast-complexity-of-the-humans-who-exist-around-us” kinda way. I also think it’s vital to read books that aren’t by people like me so that my own perspective is opened up. You should try that. Maybe you thought because I looked like you in some way we shared a certain bigoted point-of-view, like how sometimes white guys go up to other white guys and then say racist or misogynist stuff thinking that our whitemaleness is enough of a self-selected symbol, like it’s basically an invisible Swastika or Confederate Flag imperceptibly branded across our foreheads to indicate a shared social shittiness.
I did not write the character into the story because he affects the story, but at the same time, he does reflect it — the Heartland begins as a world where teenagers are forced to marry each other, and that means very explicitly that the Empyrean government enforces heterosexual couplings and nothing else. Which is a pretty horrible place to be as a person who isn’t heterosexual like, say, how America was just a few short months and years ago. Also, is gayness supposed to be a “plot point” if the character features? Is that essential? Why does that not apply to straight people? Why weren’t you mad that the character’s straightness didn’t matter and affect the story? And how exactly is that supposed to happen? The bad guys build a machine meant to run on one kind of sexual orientation or another? “BRING ME MORE GAYNESS THE MACHINE MUST FEED.”
I think your complaints are weird. What the hell, man. What the hell. Maybe you’re a parent, and that’s what this is? Certainly a lot of the complaints I receive from the readers of my YA work are from adults who have teenagers. These parents tend to be mad because I acknowledge that teenagers sometimes (gasp, I know) have sex and do drugs and say naughty words. One reviewer once said that teenagers, carte blanche, don’t say bad words. Like it’s never happened in the history of teenagerdom. But ignorance of teen habits is how you get abstinence training which is how you get pregnant teenagers and bad MTV reality shows about those pregnant teenagers. Teaching abstinence is like telling people not to ever get in a car (ever!) instead of teaching them where the fucking seatbelts are. Either way, your kids will not be harmed by fictional exposure to gayness, or gay sex, or bad words, or sex in general, or drugs, or any of that. I got bad news, Jack — your kids go to school and live in the world and that means they’re in the middle of it. That’s just how it is. Better to lend narrative context instead of pretending it doesn’t exist.
Your teenagers are probably socially way ahead of you, by the way.
Is it just that you think two dudes making out is gross and weird? Because that’s gross and weird if you think that. Don’t be gross and weird. Be awesome and cool instead.
Oh, and as a sidenote, you’re on the third book of a series and this character isn’t new, so…? The whole gay thing has kinda been in there since the first book. (Not to mention: the book is filled with violence and yet, none of that seemed to bother you at all. Ah, Puritanical handwaving. Violence is cool. Love is bad. Good times.) How’d you get here? There were signs. Big gay signs. That had to be a willful choice on your part, or you don’t know how to count. If it’s the former, then I ask again: what the hell? If it’s the latter, I remind you: it’s 1 then 2 then 3, not 3 then 2 then 1. I’ll let my four year old teach you about counting and I think I’ll also let him tell you about loving consensual relationships between adults of any stripe because he literally has no idea that any of this is wrong and in fact I’m pretty sure he doesn’t even notice at all.
Anyway, thanks for reading! Here is a picture of a cuddly pug** to help soothe you.
*not sorry
**not a photo of a cuddly pug
Jessa Slade says:
I’ve always loved cuddly pugs, but these cuddly pugs** were extra delightful. Thank you.
July 22, 2015 — 3:05 PM
thesexiestwriter says:
Picture threw me there…I didn’t see your warning. Hey, does that warning qualify as requiring a trigger alert for people that are traumatized by guys kissing?
July 22, 2015 — 3:06 PM
Sean Hoade says:
This is all so very WIN, but “Pouty McGee”made my day.
July 22, 2015 — 3:07 PM
Rachel Robinson says:
I think the guy is just mad someone is getting lovin besides him. It smacks of envy and self righteous indignation all at the same time.
July 22, 2015 — 5:53 PM
Terry says:
Excellent rejoinder, sir! I only hope he reads it. Oh, but his kids may be home-schooled thus not exposed to any of that naughty stuff – until they can escape and find the real world on their own. I only hope the home-schooling hasn’t crippled them so much they can’t function in the read world.
Love the picture of the cuddly pig.
July 22, 2015 — 3:07 PM
Michael Patrick Hicks says:
I believe that my response to your response to this e-mail is perfectly encapsulated in this clip from the film Face/Off.
July 22, 2015 — 3:08 PM
Larissa says:
So, this whole post is awesome, but the cuddly pug pic** made it epic. Well played.
July 22, 2015 — 3:08 PM
AJ Rose says:
Thank you, Chuck, for putting a character in your book that might not be the majority, that might have different struggles, and that might *gasp* still be a human being. Pretty sure the gay kid who picks up your book will appreciate seeing that there are heroes who also happen to be gay, and that maybe, just maybe, that means s/he’s not entirely alone in an ocean, drifting along on a rowboat made of toast that will become too soggy to hold him/her, leaving them to drown in the salty waters of heteros. I know I would have liked that growing up.
July 22, 2015 — 3:09 PM
akasha111182 says:
Best. Cuddly Pug. Ever.
July 22, 2015 — 3:10 PM
boydstun215 says:
Wow, Pouty McGee, it must suck to be you. I mean, it’s no fun being an ignoramus, but then to not even be able to enjoy great literature because you’re too busy fondling your own insecurities? Damn.
July 22, 2015 — 3:12 PM
Sophie Giroir says:
Great response!
Recently I spoke to a friend about my story in which my main character is in a lesbian relationship. The relationship itself is certainly important to the story since it affects the decisions she makes. The fact that it’s a lesbian relationship doesn’t really matter at all. It just fit the character I developed. My friend asked me if I worried about limiting my readership.
No. I don’t worry about it anymore than I worry about the fact that I’m writing a science fiction with a strong lead female character. I don’t worry about it anymore than I worry about using my name rather than an ambiguous pen name so people don’t pass up a book written by a female. None of that matters. If someone refuses to read my books because I write gay characters, then I don’t think I wanted their fandom in the first place.
July 22, 2015 — 3:12 PM
Luke Matthews (@GeekElite) says:
I’ve always loved* the “It’s not essential to the plot, so why include it?” argument. This gambit is literally only ever played by people who find some aspect of characterization distasteful, and are desperately trying to couch their bigotry in some form of literary critique. It’s really ugly, and (as you point out) exposes not only ignorance, but an astounding level of cognitive dissonance.
*don’t love
July 22, 2015 — 3:14 PM
Andrew F. Butters says:
Chuck, you’re are easily on my Top 5 Favourite People of All Time Whom I Have Met and Who Write Stuff and Who Also Have Awesome Beards list.
July 22, 2015 — 3:16 PM
xxinkblotsxx says:
Who else is on this list? I must know!
July 22, 2015 — 4:17 PM
Andrew F. Butters says:
My friend Jim Tigwell is on the list. He has more of a goatee than a beard, but I’m counting it because he’s an awesome dude. Same goes for Gordon Bonnett. Alex Kimmell has a great beard and is easily on the list. Finally, there’s A.J. Aalto. She’s most notably beardless but last time I saw her she had this weird long chin hair. I should have said something but didn’t want it to be awkward.
July 23, 2015 — 3:58 PM
Andrew F. Butters says:
Apologies for the “you’re are” autocorrect / typo. I hope it doesn’t detract from my awesome list name.
July 23, 2015 — 4:02 PM
xxinkblotsxx says:
Not at all.
September 22, 2015 — 10:00 PM
Tee Morris says:
Damn.
Now I know what to do when Book 5 in the Ministry series comes out…
July 22, 2015 — 3:16 PM
babedarla says:
Thank you, Chuck. I’ve been losing a lot of faith in humanity of late, and this post helped restore it just a bit. I always forget that there are a lot of stupid-heads out there until they rear those ugly things, and it’s nice to see someone stand up to the idiocy!
By the way, I too love bands and wagons, especially big, shiny, chrome covered wagons like I grew up with–man, we kids spent hours climbing up our Chevy Parkside and sliding off its slidey fins! Such fun!
July 22, 2015 — 3:21 PM
trillian4210 says:
“equates-to-acknowledging-the-vast-complexity-of-the-humans-who-exist-around-us” kinda way…
Yes, thank you.
July 22, 2015 — 3:23 PM
Shephard says:
This made my day. I just went to Amazon and bought all three of those books. Voting with my dollars.
July 22, 2015 — 3:24 PM
Andrea Bourne says:
From a white middle-class middle-aged heterosexual mom in the South, fighting the good fight against the assumed shared social shittiness of which you speak: this is brilliant and made my day and I shared it with my friends, family, teen and pre-teen kids. Bravo!
July 22, 2015 — 3:26 PM
J.T. Carlton says:
Fuck that guy. Preach it, sister. I feel like a gay bandwagon could be the new thing, like food trucks or farmers markets. Just a bunch of really happy people riding around in a parade float, listening to music, dancing, making everyone else realize their lives are shit. That guy needs to eat a razor salad.
July 22, 2015 — 3:26 PM
L.M. says:
So many good points, that was a great read. All I can think about are all the young gay adult readers who find your books and, after reading them, think “I’m not alone! It’s okay to be gay!” I’m sure literature that depicts gay relationships has a huge, positive effect on young gay people and I’m glad people like you write it. And that pic was great lol.
July 22, 2015 — 3:27 PM
SamKD says:
Yes. This. Seconding all of L.M.’s words vehemently.
July 23, 2015 — 8:01 AM
L.M. says:
Thank you!!
July 23, 2015 — 9:47 AM
RSAGARCIA says:
Those pigs were damn fine.
July 22, 2015 — 3:28 PM
Jenny C says:
“I do like to think that it’s important to write books that feature people who aren’t me”.
Excellent words. I want to write about experiences of people who aren’t me as well, and without being asked if I’m including diversity just to fill up my bingo card. No! I just want to write an interesting book about interesting people whose experiences I will never have and whose lives I will never live. That’s the whole joy of being a writer.
July 22, 2015 — 3:30 PM
S.M. Carrière says:
Bless your beard, sir. This was a great response to a very silly complaint.
July 22, 2015 — 3:31 PM
God says:
See, I can understand your anger/ annoyance at the guy, but why get pissed off at Me? Unless the guy mentioned Me and I somehow missed something. Which happens (a lot, exactly). I’m a God of love not hate, and I don’t want to be mixed in with all that nonsense.
Great books, btw, Chuck.
July 22, 2015 — 3:32 PM
tquid says:
This is wonderful and gave me several laughs on a day when I had been feeling really despairing about the regressive, shitty elements in our world. Thanks.
July 22, 2015 — 3:35 PM
T. Jane Berry says:
I find that people who say queer characters “didn’t matter” or “effect [sic] the story,” so why have them are people for whom the “default” assumption is always cis and straight.
There is no default, folks. Everyone wants to see themselves represented in media. It’s a thrill to find a character that you connect with or resemble instead of sitting through everyone else’s fantasies.
July 22, 2015 — 3:36 PM
M.A. Kropp says:
As a fan of bands and wagons (and gay guys, for that matter. Some of the best guys I know are gay), may I have a place on that bandwagon should you find it? Much applause to you for this response. Much sadness to Pouty McGee for his piss-poor attitude. Oh, and as the mother of three now-grown *girls* who went through those teenaged years, if he does think teenagers do not use bad words, I will gladly disabuse him of that notion. They taught me a few. Keep writing your way, sir. Not that I thought you wouldn’t, of course. There are plenty of us out here who like your stuff quite well just the way it is.
July 22, 2015 — 3:37 PM
Gina X. Grant says:
As someone who writes lots of 2-heroed books, I thank you. I also love bands and wagons and sometimes also beardo white dudes.
July 22, 2015 — 3:39 PM
Quinn says:
I just wanted to thank you for the “jumping on the bandwagon” comment. I have seen a lot of fictional works (especially amateur fiction works, as I am an amateur) that take this meaning quite literally. As if having a homosexual person somehow makes writing better, just because they’re homosexual.
It seems you don’t share this view, and because of that I have even more respect for you than before.
July 22, 2015 — 3:42 PM
beth teliho says:
Of course I clicked on the cuddly pug (not a cuddly pug) link. hehehe This post is a huge part of why I lerv you, Chuck.
July 22, 2015 — 3:43 PM
Leslie Bird Nuccio says:
Cuddly pug. Snerk!
July 22, 2015 — 3:44 PM
Shiny Butter says:
Really adorable cuddly pig. Totally soothing. And so, so thoughtful of you, beardo sourpuss white dude.
July 22, 2015 — 3:45 PM
Nathan Strickland (@nstrickles) says:
Wait, so someone reached out to you to specifically complain about this? Is this a thing? Does he write scathing emails to directors or short-order cooks when he is unsatisfied with their products?
“The lack of male dinosaurs in Jurassic World offends my traditional values!”
“The amount of mayonnaise on this burger makes me deeply uncomfortable with my sexuality!”
July 22, 2015 — 3:46 PM
Toni says:
This made me CLAH (cackle like a hen)!
July 26, 2015 — 9:25 PM
C.Steven Manley (@cstevenmanley) says:
Holy Shit, Chuck: That response might be my favorite thing you’ve written. Nicely done, sir.
July 22, 2015 — 3:47 PM
jlmandrill says:
Chuck Wendig, I never heard of you. Twitter brought me here. Now I’m a follower.
July 22, 2015 — 3:47 PM
Joy Walker Hall says:
This was so on point. Thanks for making it clear enough that even a bigoted numbnut might understand……and doing it with humor.
July 22, 2015 — 3:47 PM
Donna Prior (@_Danicia_) says:
Fucking brilliant, man. <3
July 22, 2015 — 3:47 PM
wordsmithmagic says:
This. Is. Amazing. Great response. I commend you, sir.
July 22, 2015 — 3:51 PM
KimBoo York says:
moar pix of cuddly pugs pls okay thanxbai 😉
Great comeback, Chuck, overall. Thanks for speaking up — sad that people like Pouty McGee make it necessary.
July 22, 2015 — 3:51 PM
Kimber Leigh Wheaton says:
Nicest cuddly pug picture I’ve seen– ever. I am so sick of haters, *sigh*. I had a comment a few months back from a follower who didn’t approve of me spotlighting a homosexual romance on my blog. Sweetheart, you were crying to the wrong person because I appreciate romance in all of it’s forms. It’s beautiful when people fall in love, regardless of sexual orientation. That some people can’t see it makes me feel quite sorry for them.
July 22, 2015 — 3:54 PM
Mitchell Hattaway says:
The poor bastard’s really gonna have a heart attack when he finds out how you chose to have Wedge and Chewie celebrate the victory at Endor.
July 22, 2015 — 3:56 PM
edelspot says:
*Drops mic*
……. Aaaaaaand…… Wild applause.
July 22, 2015 — 3:57 PM
Vikki Jankowski says:
I think, as a moral imperative, each and every one of us should include a gay character in our next books and include a dedication to “Pouty McGee” and perhaps even a foreword explaining why, in our minds, this gay character is actually a representation of all the Pouty McGee’s in our world who are, as we know, closet homosexuals themselves.
July 22, 2015 — 3:59 PM
Toni says:
You, madame, are a genius! An evil, wonderful genius!
July 26, 2015 — 9:26 PM
annabutlerfiction says:
Chuck, I’m delighted you didn’t exile yourself from speaking on things that matter. This was beautiful.
July 22, 2015 — 3:59 PM
Sarah_Madison says:
Sharing and RTing because this is so fucking awesome.
July 22, 2015 — 4:01 PM
lucie says:
That pug-not-pug shot rocked my world. So did the rest of it.
July 22, 2015 — 4:07 PM
gracebranniganauthor says:
I am so reblogging this. Thanks. 🙂
July 22, 2015 — 4:10 PM
neverie says:
Mr. Wendig, you are the actual best. The actual. BEST. XD <333333333333333333333
July 22, 2015 — 4:10 PM
vdouglas57 says:
I actually had a reader of one of my books complain about the heterosexual relationship between newlyweds. *laughing* Apparently only G. R. R. Martin can have his characters have sex, otherwise it doesn’t belong in fantasy novels!
July 22, 2015 — 4:22 PM
percykerry923 says:
Well, like Taylor says, Haters gonna Hate Hate Hate Hate Hate. Whether it;s hating gays, or homosexuality, or a gay character in your novel.
They can shove thier infinite hate up their…you know where.
And I loved the cuddly pugs. So cute 😛
July 22, 2015 — 4:23 PM