Note: I had this on THE TWEETERS, and thought it would be good to transcribe here, too: a series of thoughts and tips on purging that first — or zero — draft from your brainbucket. Please to enjoy.
* * *
SOOOoooo let’s switch gears a little bit and talk more about one of my favorite things: CREATIVE REGURGITATION IN THE FORM OF HORKING UP THE MESSY, SHRIEKING FIRST DRAFT OF YOUR NOVEL — whether for #NaNoWriMo or just for shits and giggles, let’s talk some tips.
Obviously writing a book is fucking hard. It’s you wandering through a dark house that isn’t your own. You’re going to bang your knee on a lot of furniture. Gonna trip. Gonna meet some ghosts there in the dark. It’s okay.
It’s like, part of writing is that act of finding your way through that dark, unfamiliar house. It’s you mapping the terrain, gaining comfort, learning how first to creep through that place and soon, sprint. This tends to come as you write more and redraft.
But sometimes, wandering through the dark rooms and twisting chambers, you just wanna find a fainting couch and NOPE right the fuck out of the book.
So it’s valuable to consider some storytelling tips to help you push on through.
And obviously as always the caveat, the bleating alarm, AWOOGA AWOOGA, is that nothing I say here is True, writing advice does not equal Facts, this shit ain’t Math, it’s just me giving you some sassy notions you are free to use, abuse, or discard to your liking.
Or, put differently, WRITING ADVICE IS BULLSHIT, BUT SOMETIMES BULLSHIT FERTILIZES.
Let us continue.
(oh and these storytelling tips aren’t necessarily just for novels — stories share similar bones across a variety of formats and media)
Okay, first up: CHARACTERS ARE THEIR PROBLEMS. That’s why they’re there on the page. They have problems and they’re trying to solve them, and the story is about that attempt to solve those problems.
We talk a lot about motivation and wants and stuff when it comes to characters, but for me, there’s value in getting right to the heart of it — a problem. A problem indicates conflict, and conflict is food that feeds the reader. Identify that problem ASAP, and set them to solve.
Smaller problems are more interesting than bigger ones. By which I mean, Han Solo’s debt problems in Star Wars is far more interesting than OMG REBELLION VERSUS EMPIRE. His problem is empathic and understandable. Find common emotional bonds with the audience.
A character tries to solve their problem, it’s your job, as THE MONSTER THAT YOU ARE, to stand in their way. This is the maze — you create bends and distractions and hard choices and character flaws and physical obstacles that prevent them from easily solving their problems.
As a character walks this metaphorical maze — literally DOING SHIT and SAYING SHIT in pursuit of the end to their problem — they are basically excreting plot like narrative earthworms. CHARACTERS ARE PLOT-SHITTERS.
(that’s the name of my next book, by the way: CHARACTERS ARE PLOT-SHITTERS: YOUR GUIDE TO WRITING CHARACTERS WHO POOP PLOT ORGANICALLY, coming soon)
Another of your jobs as storyteller is to remember that storytelling is the act of shattering the status quo — at the beginning of the story, SOMETHING HAS CHANGED. There has been a shift, a pivot, and that ties into or complicates the characters’ problem(s).
Further, narrative is an act that must resist stabilization.
What I mean is, even as a story — the characters, the plot, the narrative — begins to stabilize, it must again destabilize to continue. This creates interest. This creates rhythm. A sense of uncertainty.
This is why in the units of narrative measurement, those units often end with a kind of upset — a scene, a sequence, an act all end with SOMETHING CHANGING. The larger the narrative unit, the larger that change will likely need to be.
This is for the characters, and by proxy, the audience — you want them to start to feel settled, and then you fuck up the narrative tectonics once more, moving the earth beneath their feet. Sometimes subtly, sometimes to break the world.
You have ways shake the ground — the saying goes that instead of using AND THEN, you’re better off going with BUT or THEREFORE — but really, it’s worth looking at all the conditional conjunctions as words of consequential narrative value.
Meaning, instead of this happens AND THEN this happens AND THEN this happens, it’s…
this happens
BECAUSE OF
this
BUT THEN
this
UNLESS
this
but EVEN IF this, etc, etc,
…it’s like a Mad Libs story equation, letting you play with chain of consequence and event.
The shape of narrative matters. You never want a straight line. Even the standard “male ejaculatory arc” is boring news — you want a story that kinks like a maze, that rumbles and loops like a roller coaster.
When in doubt: try to surprise yourself. Make a decision on the page that isn’t the decision you intended. You can’t fuck it up — it’s your story, you’re the god of this place. If you felt like going right, ask what happens if you go left, or up, or you blow it all up.
“Dave was going to ask Esmerelda to marry him in this scene, but instead, WHAT IF HE BECOMES A VENGEFUL WEREWOLF AND HE NOISILY EATS A BABY IN FRONT OF HER then what happens?” is a very good question.
(wait that’s a terrible example, eschew baby-eating)
Also when in doubt: pump the story full of YOU. Your ideas, your fears, your worries, your peccadillos, your armadillos, your bag of dildos wait hold on what
What I mean is, in that first draft especially, a story is often a conversation between the author and the author. It’s you… working stuff out. Maybe subconsciously, maybe not. But don’t be afraid to HAVE FEELINGS and OPINIONS and mud-wrestle with those notions on the page.
It’s why putting politics in stories is essential — not as an act of preaching, but as an act of examining these ideas, questioning them, grappling with them. Politics not as an emblem of political parties, but as a signal of grand ideas that affect PEOPLE.
That’s the nature of theme: hidden arguments going on behind the walls of the story, like ghosts bickering near the conduits of wire and between copper pipes. Every story is an argument. That’s not a bad thing.
And letting that be true — embracing that instead of fearing it — gives you energy to write more, because the work on the page is salient, is intriguing to you, is surprising, uncertain, argumentative. We all argue with ourselves. Do some of it in the story.
And at the end of the day?
Be interesting.
We talk a lot about SHOW DON’T TELL but a religious rigor in this leaves a story being pure purple prose — all reaction shots and heightened senses.
We do call it “storytelling” for a reason.
When you must TELL something, the goal simply is to make it interesting. Fun to read, which means fun to tell, too. Exposition can itself be a kind of story nested in a story.
(It’s the difference between a boring-ass history book and a fascinating one. History is dull when it’s facts and figures. It’s fascinating when it is, itself, told as a story.)
AAAAANYWAY, hope that all helps, okay, goodbye, good luck.
Tell good stories!
And art harder, motherfuckers.
p.s. you can have all of this unpacked more in a book I wrote called
DAMN FINE STORY: Mastering the Tools of a Powerful Narrative
What do Luke Skywalker, John McClane, and a lonely dog on Ho’okipa Beach have in common? Simply put, we care about them.
Great storytelling is making readers care about your characters, the choices they make, and what happens to them. It’s making your audience feel the tension and emotion of a situation right alongside your protagonist. And to tell a damn fine story, you need to understand why and how that caring happens.
Whether you’re writing a novel, screenplay, video game, or comic, this funny and informative guide is chock-full of examples about the art and craft of storytelling–and how to write a damn fine story of your own.
Indiebound / Amazon / B&N
conniejjasperson says:
I always force my clients to buy your book, Damn Fine Story. Well, I don’t force them, but I strongly “help them click ‘buy.'”
November 8, 2018 — 10:44 AM
terribleminds says:
😀
November 8, 2018 — 12:15 PM
Muggs says:
I’m the freaky sad pimply high school girl staring with self-annihilating lust at the intelligent bad boy who just owned the principal … but oh god, Chuck Wendig, you’re my hero today for sharing this. Okay, you can drive off with the blonde now while I cry.
November 8, 2018 — 11:07 AM
terribleminds says:
I don’t know exactly what this means but… thank you?
November 8, 2018 — 12:15 PM
Deborah Makarios says:
Thought-provoking.
While my book does tangentially involve revolutions, counter-coups and heists, the heart of the matter is a snappy young woman losing her job, plotting to get the job of her dreams, and then desperately scrabbling to avoid getting the closely related job of her nightmares.
Today’s plot decision: should the housemaid find blood on the floor?
November 8, 2018 — 6:14 PM
Jenni Cornell says:
Damn fine book. I’d highly recommend it!
November 8, 2018 — 7:01 PM
J.S.Mueller says:
I got your book in my TBR pile (I mean physically, on my shelf). You struck a chord with CHARACTERS ARE PLOT-SHITTERS. I always start with a character who has a problem or wants something desperately. Sometimes that causes an array of plot-shit and I have to figure out which one is likely to put him through the most hell…and that’s what I go with.
November 8, 2018 — 7:24 PM
Lynda Parker says:
Well, Chuck my NaNoWriMo is going full steam ahead! I’m chugging through it like a steam train and have just past my 15,000 words on the 8th day in… this, my friend, is a record for me! Usually I’m struggling with a book like this, but for some reason, this book isn’t a struggle. I think it might be all the research I did beforehand in October and all the writing down of the characters from the last 2 books.
dunno, don’t care, I’m going well.
November 8, 2018 — 11:22 PM
Anne D. says:
I love this so hard right now, Chuck. I keep reminding myself: I am not a monster. I’m supposed to be herding my characters into corners and pelting them with flaming bags of poo to see how they get out of it. 18,000 words into this year’s NaNoWriMo and so far no one has rebelled yet but I can feel it on the horizon.
And personally, I love it when they turn to me and say “You know what, asshole, I’m going to sleep with my Ex and there’s nothing you can do about it.” or something equally unplanned.
But no baby eating.
November 9, 2018 — 10:16 AM
Botanist says:
I always treat writing advice with a healthy dose of skepticism – even if it’s the best imaginable advice that works brilliantly for you, it may not be good for anyone else – but I must say this is a damned fine collection of tips!
And I am so happy to hear people (finally) push back against the “show don’t tell” sacred cow. I read a book coupla years ago, by a very well-know author, that took this mantra to its extreme. All showing, nary a smidge of telling, and the result was literally unreadable. All things have their place. Even adverbs.
November 9, 2018 — 10:25 AM
JenniferShelby says:
Have you ever come across a statement that finally clarifies a concept you’ve been struggling with? “The shape of narrative matters. You never want a straight line. Even the standard ‘male ejaculatory arc’ is boring news — you want a story that kinks like a maze, that rumbles and loops like a roller coaster” is that statement today. Thanks for that, Chuck. Three lines and I feel like a better writer.
November 9, 2018 — 12:58 PM
Minded says:
“If you felt like going right, ask what happens if you go left” for some reason this thought has never occurred to me…thank you for the challenge.
November 12, 2018 — 7:46 AM
B. Blue Marble says:
I was with you right up until your public statement AGAINST baby-eating.
What the hell happened to you, man? You used to be COOL. ;P
November 16, 2018 — 4:28 AM
terribleminds says:
THE LAW GOT ME
I am now legally bound to include language that says you should not eat babies.
November 16, 2018 — 7:51 AM