{"id":9000,"date":"2011-05-25T00:01:36","date_gmt":"2011-05-25T04:01:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/?p=9000"},"modified":"2011-05-24T19:26:04","modified_gmt":"2011-05-24T23:26:04","slug":"confessions-of-a-self-published-penmonkey","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/2011\/05\/25\/confessions-of-a-self-published-penmonkey\/","title":{"rendered":"Confessions Of A Self-Published Penmonkey"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a title=\"CONFESSIONS OF A FREELANCE PENMONKEY, Cover by Amy Houser\" href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/terribleminds\/5709891080\/in\/photostream\/lightbox\/\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/farm4.static.flickr.com\/3512\/5709891080_7b74df06e1_z.jpg?resize=427%2C640\" alt=\"\" width=\"427\" height=\"640\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Hi, my name is Chuck Wendig. And I am a self-published penmonkey.<\/p>\n<p>(&#8220;Hi, Chuck.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>As you may know, my e-book of profanity-laden writing advice, <strong>CONFESSIONS OF A FREELANCE PENMONKEY<\/strong>, is now available:<\/p>\n<p>Kindle (US): <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/B0051JTOLQ\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Buy Here<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Kindle (UK): <a title=\"Confessions of a Freelance Penmonkey\" href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/dp\/B0051JTOLQ\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Buy Here<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Nook: <a title=\"Confessions of a Freelance Penmonkey\" href=\"http:\/\/search.barnesandnoble.com\/Confessions-of-a-Freelance-Penmonkey\/Chuck-Wendig\/e\/2940012417572\/?itm=1&amp;USRI=confessions+of+a+freelance+penmonkey\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Buy Here<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Or, buy the PDF ($4.99) by clicking the BUY NOW button:<\/p>\n<form action=\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/cgi-bin\/webscr\" method=\"post\"> <input name=\"cmd\" type=\"hidden\" value=\"_s-xclick\" \/> <input name=\"hosted_button_id\" type=\"hidden\" value=\"7JEVTTJZBMTMA\" \/> <input alt=\"PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!\" name=\"submit\" src=\"https:\/\/www.paypalobjects.com\/WEBSCR-640-20110429-1\/en_US\/i\/btn\/btn_buynowCC_LG.gif\" type=\"image\" \/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.paypalobjects.com\/WEBSCR-640-20110429-1\/en_US\/i\/scr\/pixel.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And, this being my second foray into the weird wild wide world of self-publishing, I thought, it is once more a good time to comment on the state of self-publishing as I see it.<\/p>\n<h3>What About The Readers?<\/h3>\n<p>Yesterday, agent Rachelle Gardner <a title=\"Rachelle Gardner: &quot;What About Readers?&quot;\" href=\"http:\/\/cba-ramblings.blogspot.com\/2011\/05\/what-about-readers.html\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>laid down some thoughts at her blog that<\/strong><\/span><\/a> (in a loose paraphrase) suggested that legacy publishers work more directly for readers than self-publishers. The self-published, she asserts, directly serves only the authors, and creates a more perilous environment for readers.<\/p>\n<p>I get her point. I think you could make an argument that while choice is a good thing, such a glut of choice is not always a win. Too much noise and not enough signal is a loss for the readership.<\/p>\n<p>I once worried to a similar point, but I&#8217;m no longer of that belief. I&#8217;m not comfortable putting a positive or negative value on it, because once you do, you start wandering down the path of false dichotomies (<em>do this, but not this, this is awful, this is awesome, no gray area, nothing in the middle but a giant abyss filled with hungry spiders<\/em>). What it means is that the environment &#8212; the publishing and authoring ecosystem &#8212; is shifting.<\/p>\n<p>Which means that the role of gatekeeper is changing, too.<\/p>\n<p>For legacy publishers, or traditional publishers, or &#8220;old-school pub-monkeys,&#8221; depending on whatever terminology tickles your pink parts, the gatekeeper role remains largely the same.<\/p>\n<p>But both in and outside that model, driven <em>in part<\/em> by self-publishing but also in part because the world is home to a nigh-infinite selection of books, it means that the reader is becoming a gatekeeper, too. The Internet has widened the &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; in social groups considerably. Sites like <strong>Goodreads<\/strong> count toward this. So too does social media. Or <strong>Amazon<\/strong> comments. The readers are a &#8220;pure&#8221; gatekeeper in that they&#8217;re the first and last line of defense in terms of self-publishing. They give the Roman &#8220;thumbs up&#8221; or &#8220;thumbs down&#8221; in terms of whether the gladiator will be spared or made to fight another day.<\/p>\n<p>In legacy publishing, other gatekeepers exist, and that&#8217;s okay, too. We must allow for and expect an ecosystem that has room for both self-published and trad-published books. We must allow for it because <em>it&#8217;s fucking happening<\/em>, no matter how much people think either one is doom, <em>doom<\/em>, DOOM. (By the way, don&#8217;t trust anybody who tells you it&#8217;s either\/or. They&#8217;re zealots, plain and simple. Nobody has answers, the only truth we know is that this is going on; trying to predict the future or lay objective certainty upon all this is the same as trusting a homeless guy who will read your fortune in a pile of pigeon shit.)<\/p>\n<p>For the record, the glut of choice is present already, even without self-publishing. Go into a bookstore and gaze upon the racks, then recognize that <strong>Amazon <\/strong>multiplies that by a factor with many zeroes.<\/p>\n<p>Further, I have a pretty cynical mindset in terms of what serves who.<\/p>\n<p>Writers serve writers.<\/p>\n<p>Publishers serve publishers.<\/p>\n<p>Readers serve readers.<\/p>\n<p>Why should it be any other way? I&#8217;m not suggesting that this is a function of vanity or greed but rather, the reality of the marketplace. Because this is, after all, a marketplace.<\/p>\n<p>Writers and publishers aren&#8217;t magnanimous. The only one pure of heart and innocent of motive (in general) is the reader, and it is forever the reader who is king.<\/p>\n<h3>Speaking Of Selfishness: More Rumblings On Price<\/h3>\n<p>Pricing <strong>PENMONKEY <\/strong>was tough. There&#8217;s such a downward trend in price that &#8212; for me, at least &#8212; I get a little shaky. I see some authors &#8212; not readers, <em>authors<\/em> &#8212; say that they won&#8217;t buy e-books now above a certain price, and sometimes that price is surprisingly bargain basement. So, here I am with a book that in part recycles material from this blog, material written over the course of two years. That&#8217;s a ding against it, right? But it&#8217;s also a <em>huge<\/em> book. 100,000+ words. And it has new content. And I paid for an extra-sexy cover, so that&#8217;s a cost that needs covering.<\/p>\n<p><strong>IRREGULAR CREATURES<\/strong> I priced at $2.99, and was only 45k, <em>and<\/em> is niche because it&#8217;s a collection of short stories. I felt <strong>PENMONKEY <\/strong>was less niche, and had twice the content, and so I noodled with twice the price. In the end, though, it seemed that five bucks was a pretty clean price. I know I&#8217;ll drop five bucks very easily. On media, on food, on anything. So, that seemed like a good place.<\/p>\n<p>You likely won&#8217;t see $0.99 as a price from me. I may do sales, but I think I&#8217;m done with that as a price point. No harm, no foul to anybody else who wants to go that way (I know a number of smart, excellent writers who are rocking that price point), but it&#8217;s just not tenable for me. Not only morally (I&#8217;m stubborn), but financially. I can&#8217;t live on that price. I can&#8217;t feed my son on that price (well, technically he&#8217;s chowing down on hot tasty boob, but <em>eventually<\/em> I&#8217;ll need to buy him food). Listen, to make a barebones $35,000\/year, I would need to sell 116,000 e-books over the course of a year at $0.99.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s a lot of goddamn books.<\/p>\n<p>That number drops <em>significantly<\/em> at $2.99 &#8212; there, I only need to sell 17,500.<\/p>\n<p>Still a lot, but way less epic a number.<\/p>\n<p>At $4.99: ~9600 books\/year.<\/p>\n<p>At $6.99: ~7100 books\/year.<\/p>\n<p>At $9.99: ~5000 books\/year.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t put those numbers there as indicators of anything except, at the right prices, authors can actually earn out and become genuinely self-sufficient at higher price points.<\/p>\n<p>I know this issue has greater levels of complexity than I&#8217;m stating here, and I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with authors who price low. Go for it. I&#8217;m just not betting on that being the right course for me and my books.<\/p>\n<h3>Books Breeding Like Lusty Rabbits<\/h3>\n<p>This isn&#8217;t new information, but having more than one book for sale is a good thing. When <strong>PENMONKEY<\/strong> hit, <strong>IRREGULAR CREATURES<\/strong> sales went up. They&#8217;re still up, actually.<\/p>\n<p>This is tricky for the self-pubbed author because it means you&#8217;re under greater pressure to <em>produce, produce, produce<\/em>. Which is where you might find issues of quality lagging.<\/p>\n<h3>Self-Pubbing Is Still A Pain In The Ball Sack<\/h3>\n<p>Self-publishing takes work that goes beyond. You know this. I know this. I just want to reiterate it for those who are planning on going that route. From cover design to e-book prep to marketing to all that jazz, more of the weight falls to the author&#8217;s shoulders. Because now, author = publisher. Again, this is both good and bad. It&#8217;s just worth noting.<\/p>\n<p>This time, I prepped the book for <strong>Amazon<\/strong> using MobiPocket, and while it took me a little bit to learn how to use it, I think it came out better. Though the table-of-contents gave me problems.<\/p>\n<p>Getting the book onto the <strong>Nook<\/strong> marketplace was actually a lot easier. Upload, one, and done.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Smashwords<\/strong> can pretty much go eat a dick.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not yet on<strong> iBooks<\/strong>. Not sure why I would, yet.<\/p>\n<p>Also still considering a print version.<\/p>\n<h3>Goddamnit, Authors, Create A Direct Channel<\/h3>\n<p>Still surprising how few authors offer a direct channel to sell their e-book. Everybody&#8217;s so up in arms about &#8220;middlemen,&#8221; well, fine, then recognize that <strong>Amazon<\/strong> <em>is<\/em> a middleman.<\/p>\n<p>I will forever sell a PDF version directly to readers. Not only do I get more value out of that (<strong>PayPal<\/strong> takes a far less robust cut), but it offers readers a different way of getting your book.<\/p>\n<p>Why do that? Well&#8230;<\/p>\n<h3>Sales Numbers<\/h3>\n<p>I don&#8217;t know how many books I sold on the first day of release because, oops, my son &#8212; the baby penmonkey &#8212; decided he wanted to be born on Friday. (As dear friend Aaron Dembski-Bowden said, &#8220;you published a baby&#8221;). I had crapgasmic Internet at the hospital, and no way to really check how the book was doing. I did see that the book rocked up the <strong>Amazon<\/strong> charts, which was neat. Made it to #1444 across all Kindle books. Made it to #1 in writing reference (Kindle) and I believe #10 across writing reference books across the board (meaning, beyond the Kindle marketplace).<\/p>\n<p>I know that I sold about 150 copies over the first few days of release.<\/p>\n<p>A happy-making number, and again, many thanks to those who procured.<\/p>\n<p>My numbers are currently at 67% Kindle, 24% PDF, and 9% Nook.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s that middle number that I want you to note: my direct sales through PDF are, as they were with <strong>IRREGULAR CREATURES<\/strong>, rocking at 20-25%. That&#8217;s a big number. Better than Nook.<\/p>\n<p>Authors: offer your product directly.<\/p>\n<p>Interface with the audience as one facet of sales.<\/p>\n<h3>What&#8217;s Next?<\/h3>\n<p>Well, <strong>PENMONKEY<\/strong> shall continue, one hopes, doing well. I&#8217;ll eventually do some contests and what-not.<\/p>\n<p>I am available for interviews.<\/p>\n<p>I am available for gust-bloggening.<\/p>\n<p>I am available for handjobs behind the <strong>Burger King<\/strong> dumpster.<\/p>\n<p>If you contacted me on Friday about any of these, please re-contact. I apologies, but again, that day was <em>apeshit<\/em>. Much that I probably missed, so please, re-contact.<\/p>\n<p>Spread the love. If there&#8217;s anything I can do for you, please say the word.<\/p>\n<p>I do anticipate a print release, but I&#8217;m not sure about Lulu or Createspace. As noted earlier, thinking on doing something with a higher-end printing that incorporates some of my photography.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond that, I&#8217;ll continue to work in the self-pub space, though obviously I&#8217;m a fan of &#8220;traditional&#8221; publishing, too. Got <strong>DOUBLE DEAD<\/strong> coming out in November and hopefully more beyond that. Again I say that everybody needs to get used to an ecosystem that features a many-headed publishing beast. Authors are best straddling those worlds, in my opinion. Lest they fall into the spider-clogged abyss.<\/p>\n<\/form>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As you may know, my e-book of profanity-laden writing advice, CONFESSIONS OF A FREELANCE PENMONKEY, is now available: And, this being my second foray into the weird wild wide world of self-publishing, I thought, it is once more a good time to comment on the state of self-publishing as I see it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10,8,3],"class_list":{"0":"post-9000","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"hentry","6":"category-theramble","7":"tag-advice","8":"tag-rantsandramblings","9":"tag-writing","11":"no-featured-image"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pv7MR-2la","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9000"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9000\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9006,"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9000\/revisions\/9006"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/terribleminds.com\/ramble\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}