The Storytelling Lesson In Jon Klassen’s “Stolen Hat” Books

If you care about this in the context of children’s books (at which point I must assume you’re like, eight years old and probably don’t belong here anyway): the following post has a spoiler warning for Jon Klassen’s I Want My Hat Back and its follow-up, This Is Not My Hat.




Rob Donoghue sent me the first “hat” book, and it is easily my favorite book to read to my son. Further, B-Dub likes it, too. When he wants it, he makes growling noises and taps his head, or calls out any of the animals within (a particular favorite is turtle, or “toor-tull”).

Yesterday, I poked through Barnes & Noble (hey, look, physical bookstores still exist! even though this one was phasing out of existence even as I walked through it, the air shimmering and revealing a panoply of retail possibilities — Panera, Old Navy, Coldstone Creamery, Big Dan Don’s Buttplug Bonanzaporium) and I found the sequel, This Is Not My Hat.

I read it.

And I realized:

The two books are essentially the same.

They tell the story of a most ungracious hat thievery, in which one small animal steals the tiny hat of a larger animal. In the first book, a rabbit steals that from a bear. In the second book, a little fish steals the hat off a much larger fish.

In both books, the big animal discovers what has happened and, despite being a bit big and doofy, eventually tracks down the hat thief and… well, it is implied that the bigger creature eats the smaller creature in order to regain the precious and titular hat.

Here’s where a critical storytelling lesson lies:

In the first book, the bear is the protagonist. The bear’s hat has been stolen.

In the second book, the tiny fish is the protagonist. The tiny fish has stolen a hat.

First book, we side with the victim.

Second book, we side with the thief.

We read the first book, and we feel for the bear. When he finally goes ahead and eats the rabbit and reclaims his hat, there is a moment if triumph (if a triumph of some black humor) because: YAY BEAR HAS HIS HAT BACK.

We read the second book, and we feel for the tiny fish. The tiny fish gives all his reasons for having stolen the hat. The tiny fish believes he has gotten away with, erm, clean fins, as it were. When the big fish finally tracks down the tiny fish and eats him to reclaim the hat, there is a moment of horror because: OH GOD THE TINY FISH IS (probably) DEAD.

Same story.

But a shift in perspective wildly alters our perception of that story.

From triumph, to revulsion.

From a tale of a dumb bear reclaiming his beloved hat…

…to the tale of a tiny delusional hat-thief getting his brutal comeuppance.

The lesson is, of course, that a simple shift in perspective changes so much in a story. Use a shift of perspective in fiction — and, perhaps, in life — to deepen the complexity of the story and to gain fresh understanding. Ignore this shift to keep things more narratively monochromatic. Further, it’s a lesson that few antagonists believe themselves evil: the tiny fish does not steal the hat because he is evil but rather because he is selfish and is able to delude himself about that selfishness. He has his reasons. He is, as are most antagonists, the hero of his own story.

For a kid’s book, it’s powerful stuff.

Maybe too powerful right now for B-Dub, who is not even two years old —

But powerful, just the same.

13 responses to “The Storytelling Lesson In Jon Klassen’s “Stolen Hat” Books”

  1. I LOVE THESE BOOKS TO PIECES. The DPS of the bear and the rabbit in their silent, threatening face-off lives semi-permanently in my head. My children, however, aren’t interested. Is hat-thievery and beastly murder amusing only to the world of 10+?

  2. I just read The Candymakers by Wendy Mass – middle grade novel, so there are years before B-Dub is ready for it. But it tells a story from 4 different perspectives, but through a reliable 3rd person narrator. All that changes is the view through which you see the facts, not the facts themselves. Suddenly motivations become clear and complex characters are revealed.

    I’m totally and completely biased (I have a degree in children’s lit and I have a review site for kids books), but I think books like these, with the changing perspectives, are important for kids. They can learn a lot from reading books that quietly challenge how they view the world.

    Children’s books are among the most important and effective methods for kids to learn about the world, themselves, and other people.

  3. FYI – two fav children’s books that my kids loved because of their awesome rhythms: “Charlie Parker Plays Bee Bop” and “Hand, Hand, Fingers, Thumb.”

    They went around chanting them all the time. (Come to think of it, so did I…)

  4. No one mourns the Wicked, but I’ve seen the musical many times, and ran to the song ‘Gravity’ on my ipod. And of course there’s Grendel.

  5. My first thought was that, Woh! That’s pretty strong stuff for a kids book. Then I remembered fairy tales I’d been read in my youth. I guess the hat thriller guy isn’t worried about political correctness. Refreshing yet interesting.

  6. Trying to sort out if my detectives or union workers should be the protagonists in my latest script was plaguing me just yesterday. Either side could be the “good guys” or the “bad guys.” Argh.

  7. Does anyone remember “Blueberries for Sal” and its four POV characters? Not to mention blueberry deliciousness…

    Good stuff to know. Especially because I’m considering writing a book for my daughter about sharks… since that’s all she’ll read right now. */facepalm*

  8. This is just what I needed! I’m expected to teach POV to 2nd graders, and it is such an abstract concept that I’ve had a great struggle to convince my duckies that the world does not revolve around them. I must locate these books and use them for evil… I mean, good!

Speak Your Mind, Word-Nerds

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: