25 Things You Should Know About Word Choice

1. A Series Of Word Choices

Here’s why this matters: because both writing and storytelling comprise, at the most basic level, a series of word choices. Words are the building blocks of what we do. They are the atoms of our elements. They are the eggs in our omelets. They are the shots of liquor in our cocktails. Get it right? Serendipity. Get it wrong? The air turns to arsenic, that cocktail makes you puke, this omelet tastes like balls.

2. Words Define Reality

Words are like LEGO bricks: the more we add, the more we define the reality of our playset. “The dog fucked the chicken” tells us something. “The Great Dane fucked the chicken” tells us more. “The Great Dane fucked the bucket of fried chicken on the roof of Old Man Dongweather’s barn, barking with every thrust” goes the distance and defines reality in a host of ways (most of them rather unpleasant). You can over-define. Too many words spoil the soup. Find the balance between clarity, elegance, and evocation.

3. The “Hot And Cold” Game

You know that game — “Oh, you’re cold, colder, colder — oh! Now you’re getting hot! Hotter! Hotter still! Sizzling! Yay, you found the blueberry muffin I hid under the radiator two weeks ago!” –? Word choice is like a textual version of that game where you try to bring the reader closer to understanding the story you’re trying to tell. Strong, solid word choice allows us to strive for clarity (hotter) and avoid confusion (colder).

4. Most With Fewest

Think of it like a different game, perhaps: you’re trying to say as much as possible with as few words as you can muster. Big ideas put as briefly as you are able. Maximum clarity with minimum words.

5. The Myth Of The Perfect Word

Finding the perfect word is as likely as finding a downy-soft unicorn with a pearlescent horn riding a skateboard made from the bones of your many enemies. Get shut of this notion. The perfect is the enemy of the good. For every sentence and every story you have a plethora of right words. Find a good word. Seek a strong word. But the hunt for a perfect word will drive you into a wide-eyed froth. Though, according to scholars, “nipplecookie” is in fact the perfect word. That’s why Chaucer used it so often. Truth.

6. No One Perfect Word, But A Chumbucket Of Shitty Ones

For every right word, you have an infinity of wrong ones.

7. Awkward, Like That Kid With The Headgear And The Polio Foot

You might use a word that either oversteps or fails to meet the idea you hope to present. A word in that instance would be considered awkward. “That dinner fornicated in his mouth” is certainly a statement, and while it’s perhaps not a technically incorrect metaphor, it’s just plain goofy (and uh, kinda gross). You mean that the flavors fornicated, or more likely that the flavors of the meal were sensual, or that they inspired lewd or libidinous thoughts. (To which I might suggest you stop French-kissing that forkful of short ribs, pervhouse.) To go with the food metaphor for a moment (“meat-a-phor?”), you ever take a bite of food and, after it’s already in your mouth, discover something in there that’s texturally off? Bit of gristle, stem, bone, eyeball, fingernail, whatever? The way you’re forced to pause the meal and decipher the texture with your mouth is the same problem a reader will have with awkward word choice. It obfuscates meaning and forces the reader to try to figure out just what the fuck you’re talking about.

8. Ambiguous, Like That Girl With That Thing Outside That Place

Remember how I said earlier that words are like LEGO, blah blah blah help define reality yadda yadda poop noise? Right. Ambiguous word choice means you’re not defining reality very well in your prose. “Bob ate lunch. It was good. Then he did something.” Lunch? Good? Something? Way to wow ’em with your word choice, T.S. Eliot. To repeat: aim for words that are strong, confident, and above all else, clarifying.

9. Incorrect, Like That Guy Who Makes Up Shit When He’s Drunk

Incorrect word choice means you’re using the wrong damn word. As that character says in that movie, “I do not think it means what you think it means.” Affect, effect. Comprise, compose. Sensual, sensuous. Elicit, illicit. Eminent, immanent, imminent. Allude, elude. Must I continue? Related: if you write “loose” instead of “lose,” I cannot be held accountable if I kick you so hard in your butthole you choke on a hemorrhoid.

10. Step Sure-Footedly

Point of fact: the English language was invented by a time-traveling spam-bot who was trapped in a cave with a crazy monk. Example: The word “umbrage” means “offense,” so, to take umbrage means to take offense. Ah, but it also means the shade or protection afforded by trees. I used to take the second definition and assume it carried over to the people portion of that definition. Thus, to “take umbrage” meant in a way to “take shelter” with a person, as in, to both be under the same shadow of the same tree. I used the word incorrectly for years like some shithead. If you’re uncertain about the use of any word, it’s easy enough to either not use it or use Google to define it (“define: [word]” is the search you need). Do not trust that the English language makes sense or that your recollection of its madness is pristine. It will bite you every time.

11. The Barbaric Barf-Yawn That Is Your First Draft

This is not a hard or fast rule (hell, none of this is), but in my highly-esteemed opinion (translation: debatable bullshit mumbled by a guy who thinks “cock-waffle” should be a part of our collective daily vocabulary), you don’t need — or want! — to refine your word choice in the first draft. That initial draft is, for me, a screaming weeping blubberfest where I just want to cry all the words out without any care in the world how they get onto the page. Second and subsequent drafts, however, are a good time to zero in on problems big and small. Don’t spend your first draft scrutinizing word choice.

12. Verbs: Strong Like Bull

For every action you’ll find a dozen or more verb-flavors of that action. You can drink your coffee or you can gulp, sip, guzzle, or inhale it. You can run down the street or you can jog, bolt, sprint, dash, saunter, or hotfoot it. You can have sex with someone or you can fuck ’em, hump ’em, make love to ’em, or ride ’em like Seabiscuit in a gimp mask. (Do they make gimp masks for horses? To the Googlemobile!) Use a strong verb that clarifies the action and makes sense in the context of the scene. A hostage escaping his kidnappers isn’t going to scamper away — he’s going to barrel, hurtle, bolt, or if you’re a fan of not-fixing-what-ain’t-broke, he’ll run like a motherfucker. If the base-level verb gives you maximum potency and clarity, then use it.

13. “I Like Playing With My Cats!” John Ejaculated From His Mouth

Mmmyeah, one caveat to the “strong clarifying verb” thing — it doesn’t apply to dialogue tags. No, no. Don’t resist. Hold still. Stop trying to chew through the duct tape. I know you want to your characters to yelp, blurt, scream, gibber, shriek, murmur, mumble, babble, explain, exhort, plead, interrupt, erupt, exclaim, and ejaculate constantly, but don’t do it. Do. Not. Do. It. Rely on “say/said” 80-90% of the time. You can, when seeking variety and clarification of action, use another dialogue tag.

14. The Verb “To Be”

Am. Is. Was. To Be. Will Be. Whatever. I’m not one of those who will tell you to cut out every instance of the verb “to be” in all its simple-headed forms because sometimes, simplicity is best. And yet, overuse of that verb may weaken your writing. Look for instances where the verb can be replaced by a stronger one or where it adds needless roughage to a sentence. “Barry is playing with himself in the corner” is better as “Barry plays with himself in the corner.” If you say, “It is my opinion that Rush Limbaugh should be stuffed with dynamite and exploded like a beached whale,” you’d be better off with, “I believe Rush Limbaugh…” instead. Oh, and if a sentence starts with “there is” or “it was,” you should attack that sentence with lasers.

15. The Word “Specificity” Is Really Fun To Say

No, really. Try it, I’ll wait. … Are you done yet? Specificity. Specificity. Spehhh-siiiihh-fiiiihh-sihhhh-teeee. Anyway. Moving on. Words help us define reality — nouns doubly so. Creature? Animal? Mammal? Cat? Panther? Housecat? Tomcat? Russian Blue? The North Canadian Spangled Bobtail? There I charted specificity to the point where it became useful and then crossed over into absurd bullshit. If I tell the reader that the cat is a “housecat,” we all get it. But if I say that the cat is a “Lambkin dwarf cat,” only a handful of cat geeks are ever going to grok my lingo. Aim for specific, but realize you can get too specific.

16. The Strong Spice Of Adverb And Adjective

Sometimes, a verb or noun just doesn’t tell the whole tale. I can say “housecat,” but I mean, “calico kitty with a sprightly attitude and a penchant for meowing loudly.” Calico. Sprightly. Loudly. These all modify the verbs and nouns present in order to paint a picture. Adverbs and adjectives provide both a deeper sense of specificity while also providing flavor or color to the world. They’re a strong spice. Use when you need, not when you want. Say what you mean and no more.

17. Adverbs Are Not Your Mortal Foe

Writers often bandy about that old crunchy nugget of of penmonkey wisdom — NO ADVERBS — as if it is bulletproof. As if a gang of adverbs shanked that writer’s mother in the kidneys as she stooped over to water the hydrangeas. Adverbs are not birthed from the Devil’s hell-womb. They’re just words. Did you know that “never” is an adverb? As is “here?” And “tomorrow?” You can rely too heavily on adverbs (and amateurish writers do). You can also use adverbs that are unnecessary or that sound clunky when staple-gunned to the end of a sentence. And adverbs paired with dialogue tags will often chafe one’s taint, but that doesn’t mean you need to hunt down every last adverb with a spear-gun.

18. The Thesaurus Is Not Satan’s Own Demon Gospel

The thesaurus is not a bad book (or, these days, website). I love the thesaurus because I have a brain like a rust-eaten bucket — shit slips through all the time. I’m constantly snapping my fingers saying, “There’s a word that’s like this other word but not quite and OH SHITDAMNIT I CAN’T REMEMBER IT WHO AM I AND WHY AM I WEARING LADIES’ UNDERWEAR?” So, I turn to the thesaurus not to look for a better, fancier word but instead to find the word my feeble mouse-eaten brain cannot properly recall. It is not the thesaurus that is the root of all evil but rather the love of the thesaurus that urges writers to commit the sin of pompous word choice. It is not a crutch; do not lean upon it.

19. Big Words For Tiny Penises

Smaller words are nearly always better than big ones. Big words put distance between you and the reader. Each added syllable is a speed-bump. Don’t use word choice to sound smart. Don’t talk circles around the reader. Your job is communication. Is your story a bridge between you and the reader — or is it a wall?

20. The Jingly Jangle Of Jargon

Jargon is when you rely on technical or area-specific terminology to get across your point. Jargon uses a limited vocabulary to speak to a small circle of people, and this is true whether you’re talking about some aspect specific to knight’s armor, a scientific theory, or the manufacture of space-age dildo technology. The test is easy. Ask yourself, will most people know what the fuck I’m talking about? If yes, carry on. If no, either use plain-spoken language or take the time to explain that shit you just slung into my eyes.

21. The Plumber Versus The Aristocrat

Certainly you have some leeway in terms of choosing the correct words for your expected audience. If you’re writing a novel about baseball, nobody would fault you for using a metric crap-sack of baseball terminology. You’ll certainly write different prose if you expect your audience to comprise plumbers instead of an aristocrats. Still, you’ll find value in reading to be read widely, not just by a subset of potential readers.

22. Junk In The Trunk

I’ll admit it: I love junk words. They are the greasy hamburger of prose, delicious to me and plump with empty calories. Effectively! In theory! Very! Happen to! Point is! You know? They offer minimal — if any! — functionality. Hunt them down with merciless abandon. Stomp them with cleated shoe until they squeal.

23. From The Department Of Redundancy Department

The repetition of one or several words can have a potent effect — but what happens a lot of time is, you repeat words accidentally. “The day was hot and heat vapors rose off the ground. The heat sapped Quinn’s energy.” Hot, heat, heat. A reader will trip on such repetition. And then he’ll fall down some steps and break his coccyx. Man, “coccyx” sounds like some kind of dinosaur bird, doesn’t it? THE MIGHTY COCCYX SWOOPS TO FEAST ON THE BABY TURTLEBUGS. I dunno. Shut up. Don’t judge me.

24. The Sound Of Words Matter

Words play off other words. Together they form rhythm. Choose words that pair well together, like red wine and steak. Or Pabst Blue Ribbon and hipster shame. Or heroin and delicious urinal cakes. Shakespeare knew that rhythm mattered and so chose words that slotted into iambic pentameter. The way you hear the rhythm of the words is to read your work aloud. Do that and you’ll find the flow — or, more importantly, find what’s damming the flow so you can fix it with proper word choice and sentence construction.

25. You Will Be Judged On The Words You Choose

Consider word choice to be a test posited by the audience. Make errors (lose/loose), they will see you for the rube you are. Write by relying on big words, heavy jargon and purple prose and they will see you as sticking your literary nose in the air. The result is the same: they will close the book and then beat you to death with it. They are also likely to violate your pallid carcass with various kitchen implements.

Write to be read. Choose words that have flavor but do not overwhelm, that reach out instead of pushing back, that sound right to the ear and carry with them a kind of rhythm. Write with confidence, not with arrogance. Don’t be afraid to play with words. But be sure to let the reader play with you.

Like this post? Want more just like it? Try these books:


$2.99 at Amazon (US), Amazon (UK), B&N, PDF

The original: 500 WAYS TO BE A BETTER WRITER —

$2.99 at Amazon (US), Amazon (UK), B&N, PDF


$0.99 at Amazon (US), Amazon (UK), B&N, PDF


$4.99 at Amazon (US), Amazon (UK), B&N, PDF


$2.99 at Amazon (US), Amazon (UK), B&N, PDF


  • #20: Yes, but you have to take voice into account. And not just the voice of a character (whether quoted, or in first or ‘close’ third person) but the overall narrative tone.

    For example, Infinite Jest uses a huge amount of specialist medical and pharmacological terms – strabismic, aphasia – but it works, as crippling hyperarticulacy and medicalisation are two of the novel’s major themes. Earthy, Anglo-Saxon plain talk – squinting, speechlessness – would here work against its broader message. And I’d contend it’s not always necessary that a reader understand every word. The SF equivalent might be a technology you mostly wish to convey is really advanced, perhaps even leaving finer details to the reader’s imagination. You read Infinite Jest and sometimes you check your dictionary but sometimes you just let the language wash over you, thinking, there goes another sorry dude with a horrendous obscure Latinate afflication. The rarified vocab can actually increase your pity for the more downtrodden and inarticulate characters, giving the sense that even naming their conditions might be beyond their reach. (That’s not to say I don’t think there’s showiness in Wallace, but at least it’s showiness from a bona fide genius, which redeems it somewhat.) Anyway I guess my point is that unexplained jargon can work if, as ever, you _really_ know what you’re doing.

    Very much enjoyed the tips, as ever – thanks Chuck!

  • If you don’t find fascinating the way words can roll around on your tongue like a smooth round grape, or sate your palate like a rich meat broth, you might want to reconsider the endeavor of writing. I just loves saying “endoplasmic reticulum.”

    Writers should read #14 until they can recite it like the “Pledge of Allegiance.” Plus greatly reducing the use of “to be” verbs rewards newbie writers the quickest. And you may find this automatically suppresses the tendency to use the passive voice.

  • Two things:

    1. Forever and always, from this day forward, the phrase “this omelet tastes like balls” shall be used to describe passages of literature that I do not like.

    2. Desiring to be thought witty and cool like Chuck, I began to compose a sentence or paragraph that violates all the principles outlined here. Then, I realized that most of the crap I have ever written would fit that description without any hint of wit or charm.

    Seriously, though, thanks for taking the time to help out the rest of us.

  • I would also add to be wary of words that trigger people (insert groan here) — like behoove, azure, awesome, or *ahem* plethora (;p). I’ve had editors reject my work because of ‘trigger’ words like those.

    It might of been okay for Vonnegut to use azure, or Nabokov to use plethora, but our language has evolved since then and we need to push the envelope to communicate with today’s storyteller’s audience.

    • @Casz —

      I don’t think it’s impossible to use any of those words provided they fit in the context of the story you’re telling (or, at least, fit with the overall voice/tone of the piece).

      That’s not to say we cannot or should not push our language, but I don’t know that any word should be universally verboten.

      — c.

  • I would be remiss for not thanking you for making this post since I have brought up the topic a couple of times. 🙂 Thank you.

    One question that bugs me that is related is when I read great writers, their words sing. For instance from Roger Zelazny, This Immortal.

    “You are a Kallikanzaros,” she announced suddenly.
    I turned onto my left side and smiled through the darkness.
    “I left my hooves and my horns at the Office.”
    “You’ve heard the story!”

    Or From Stephen R Donaldson Lord Foul’s Bane

    She came out of the store just in time to see her young son playing on the sidewalk directly in the path of the gray, gaunt man who strode down the walk like a mechanical derelict. For an instant, her heart quailed. Then she jumped forward, gripped her son by the arm, snatched him out of harms way.


    I could quote all day from Zelazny, Donaldson, Stephen King, and others… but I am missing what makes those collections of words so much better. Is it some part of the words I barely grasp at play? Words like iamb, trochee, spondee, or other constructions?

  • I agree there shouldn’t be any verboten words. What I meant and poorly communicated (/writerfail) was that know your audience as much as possible. If an editor you’re submitting work for goes crazy because they hate the word “ode,” you may want to choose something else.

    Then again, I know many would bristle against such restraints. Me, I’m just trying to get anything out there right now and may as well change it to blue instead of azure if it ups my chances.

  • I don’t always agree with the “most with fewest” style. On somebody’s blog last week, I said this about why I tried to write a Shakespearean crime novel (Ms. White’s blog maybe? Hell, maybe yours. I’ve been such a blog slut lately):

    “I’ve always liked the sensuous Rubenesque fullness of Elizabethan writing – it’s like a decadent dessert compared to the stripped down Mies Van Der Rohe style that’s the lingua franca of crime fiction.”

    I don’t think more words is always or necessarily bad. (And I don’t mind throwing Rubenesque, Meis Van Der Rohe and linqua franca out there either. I always figure, if the reader doesn’t know they can look it up – I’ve learned lots of shit that way.)

    Now, if you’re using lots of the wrong words, then you’re just tossing out a blouted blancmange of icky – the verbal equivalent of Rush Limbaugh in a g-string. Nobody wants that.


  • Our language has evolved from “plethora”? But…that’s one of my top 5 favorite words and used daily in my life (and so sneaks into my writing).
    And I like “twat-waffle” much better than “cock-waffle,” it has a better internal rhyme. Which is a great tool for rhythm and interest that isn’t freakinshly obvious and weird as regular rhymes.

    Great article and one that should be tattooed inside of our eyelids as authors. I know one author in particular I’d like to have that done to….
    (there are others to be sure but this one rises to the top of my list, rather like a bloated corpse in the river)

  • For an article on word choice, you should choose your words a little more carefully. Atoms are elements, not the components of elements. An atom of gold is an element. You meant “words are the atoms of our molecules.” Molecules are made up of atoms linked together.

  • “if you write “loose” instead of ‘lose,’”

    I swear there’s some kind of airborne virus going around making writers incapable of telling these two apart. I’ve come across it half a dozen times in the past two days. Drives me crazy.

    Then I go forth and misspell something myself and feel like a total tool.

  • Chuck, whenever I need a good giggle, I know I can always turn to you for an informative and oh so silly ramblings. My twat-waffle salutes you. So does Shakespeare’s sisters. I checked.

  • #12 – inhalation of coffee is probably not recommended. Except to your enemies, of course.

    Or is there some kind of caffeine-containing nasal spray available?


    Word choice is important because words are the building blocks of sentences, and sentences are the building blocks of ideas. Find the balance between clarity, elegance and evocation or some half-wit will edit the shit out of your pretentious narrative and make you feel like an insignificant atom in a cocktail of megalomania and broken dreams. Real writers say more with less.

  • Pedant: An atom of gold is not an element. Gold is an element. An atom of gold is an atom. What kind of an atom? a gold atom. Word choice is hard. “Atoms of our molecules” doesn’t quite make it either, doesn’t quite fit somehow. Awesome post, Chuck.

  • What to Do, What Not to Do: walk your little big words like big little doggies. Let them leap ahead on leashes of little lengthy lines. Let them piddle on your pant cuffs, dig dirty holes with howls and vowels, and bury for themselves a burly bag of bones. Let loose and lose! Win! Begin! End.

    Oh… pretty puppy little words. Patting lap, whistlingly, beckoningly.

  • Whoa — this really touched me. As a writer, because it does illustrate the power of words. But also as a sighted person who has spent many days still not “seeing” the beautiful day… very powerful message.

  • Re: 14 – I should hope that writers realize that “John is playing with himself in the corner” and “John plays with himself in the corner” mean different things. The first sentence, with the verb “is playing”* states that John is actively and presently playing with himself and that the action is ongoing. The second sentence (in isolation) states that John habitually plays with himself in the corner, but it doesn’t necessarily follow that John is currently engaged in playing with himself. The “be” in the construction “be x-ing” (appropriately conjugated, of course) isn’t just there to take up space – it’s there to convey grammatical information, specifically, that the verb in question is taking the progressive aspect.

  • Chuck, you are not a good writer.
    Who told you that you were?
    Your style is too self conscious. You try too hard.
    Your writing actually stinks.

  • Funny that such a helpful article could elicit negative responses from a few ungrateful curs… Wonderful guide, thank you and, to keep the ‘helpful’ mojo flowing, a) an inhalable caffeine shot is now available, but looks like bullshit so you’re probably better off doing a whippet, and b) the Wendigo is a spooky Native American demon spirit (as well as an episode of NIGHTSTALKER) that I fear may be real, as it’s the only way to explain why that guy cut off that other guy’s head off on a bus and ate his face that one time. Thank you.

  • I used to like plethora and myriad and now I hate them and prefer profusion. Words come and go like fashion and make comebacks just the same. They communicate what the speaker is saying and who the speaker is, and like any good actor, a writer may choose different words when speaking from different character points.

    Communication is the key, even if the reader has no idea what the word means on its own.

    Now if you don’t mind, I’m going to go see if the wife will let me have some fun with her bazongas.

  • Don’t think I’ve read any of your other work- but this was evocative and engaging to the end. @ your critics: bugger off and get your own blog to prose on. Elements are made of atoms- identical ones- if there was not lots of them we would not have given a place in the periodic table to the group. You could easily argue that each writer has their own elemental style with their words the atoms- molecules however, are blended mongrels of elements- stability from collaboration- like authors, editor and readers… I have always told my children (we are a family of bibliophiles and confident at expressing ourselves when writing) that words are like crayons/colours- each has the capacity to help create a picture with tone and hue and depth. Anyway, I am humbled to speak amongst those published and will have to get a kindle so we can enjoy your ebooks 🙂

  • I think another important point to remember here is that words have different meanings for everyone. When you hear a word, your mind comes up with its meaning based on every other time you’ve ever heard that word. The meaning of a word can vary wildly between people.

  • Oh but I love her books. I am glad she doesn’t stick to one genre.Helen – I don’t think I could either. Though all of my novel ideas have been faasnty/urban faasnty . . . maybe I am sticking to one genre?

  • Great guide. I have just one quibble: “24. The Sound Of Words Matter.”

    Subject and modifier should agree: either “The Sounds of Words Matter” (i.e., sounds matter) or “The Sound of Words Matters” (i.e., sound matters). I’d go for the former, unless you’re talking about words as a single class embodying a single attribute.

    I’ve made this same error more times than I’d like to admit.

  • Damn you Chuck! It’s 2AM and I’m sitting at my PC saying ‘Specificity’ aloud like a drunken parrot. LMAO.

    Also: I’m currently reading EVERY blog entry that tickles my fancy, but I’m trying not to comment on all of them, lest you think I’m completely nuts.
    Which I am.

    @theliz13 on twitter

Speak Your Mind, Word-Nerds