Dr. Scriptface: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Screenplay
  • As demanded, I’m going to take some time over the coming weeks to devote a post or three toward screenwriting. I write so often about novel-writing, or about the overall construction of a narrative that for the most part I haven’t really addressed this part of my writing life. And it’s a substantial part: this week is a revisit of the film script to go through a new draft (this would be draft number eight, for the record).

    It seemed then that the proper place to begin was a very simple, Why I Love The Unholy Shit Out Of Writing Scripts. I do! I adore it. I don’t suffer the same sense of anxiety when writing a script, anxiety that nibbles at my edges when I’m lost in the belly of a novel.

    So.

    Why do I love screenwriting?

    Let me count the ways.

    One: Super-Fast Payoff

    I’ll cut to the chase and get to the lazy man’s reason: writing a script is fast. At least, compared to writing a novel. It feels fast, too — like, boom boom boom boom, suddenly you’ve progressed by several scenes, things have changed, shit has happened, the characters are active. Blink and you’re halfway done. You can feel the wind in your hair. You have momentum. A novel can feel sloggy, boggy, a long marathon rather than a fast sprint. Screenplays speak to my inner crack-monkey, patience be damned.

    Two: Sniper Bullet Instead Of Machine Gun Spray

    Very few novels feel highly-tuned. Many feel sloppy — big, bloated paragraphs; rampant cliches; unnecessary language; dialogue that goes on too long without saying enough. That’s just my feeling, but a lot of novels get out of control with the word count. This can be a feature, sure, but a lot of the time it’s a bug: stories that sprawl out, airing their junk, growing fatter with each reading.

    I’ve said it before: the novel feels like a spray of machine gun bullets. Fire a hail of lead, you know that some are going to hit, and some are not. Just chew apart the landscape until you kill the target. (It’s been a while since I’ve read a novel where I felt, “Wow, each word, each sentence, is critical. You cannot remove any language from this and have it stand.” Maybe, maybe Finch, by Jeff VanderMeer. Reading that, I felt like each word was perfectly placed, a critical component to the overall work.)

    A script is like a sniper bullet, though, in much the same way that a short story is: you only have one bullet. You must make it count. It teaches you about the importance of language, and specifically, how crucial brevity is to the art of elegant communication. Speaking of elegance…

    Three: The Elegance Of Action Plus Dialogue

    The simplicity of the screenplay is deeply compelling. It’s like you’ve distilled the nature of a story down to its two most visible and critical elements: action plus dialogue. It is the embodiment of the show, don’t tell admonishment: it is all the more difficult to use the visual form of a screenplay (and despite the words on page it remains a visual form) to rely on telling rather than showing. Novels, though, even some of the best novels are guilty of the “tell.” They explain away so much: the history of this, the look of that, the thoughts of this character, the telegraphed arc, and so on.

    A script doesn’t have that luxury. It is distilled down to the two thing that matter most in a story:

    Characters do stuff.

    Characters talk about stuff.

    Action.

    Dialogue.

    (And it’s for this reason that I declare: if you want to know how to write a novel, first learn how to write a screenplay. A bold statement, and one without any evidence at all! Enjoy! I’m here all week.)

    Four: The Art Of Bonsai

    Editing is also a lot easier when it comes time to pick apart a script: because it’s already down to its spare elements, because it’s already an exercise in brevity, it’s so much easier (mentally and practically) to take it apart at the seams and add new components or restitch it together in a brand new order. It’s like Bonsai: pruning down, creating art from a minimal form, the freedom of simplicity.

    Screenwriting is some crazy Zen shit. The editing even moreso.

    Five: A Reduction In Pressure

    A novel is all you. That’s a great thing, but it’s also a heavy burden: yes, the novel is also built with the critical help of editors and agents, but at the end of the day what’s on the page is all you. I don’t mean to suggest this as a negative, but only that it puts a lot of pressure on you: that brick of pages in people’s hands reflects on one individual and one individual alone.

    You.

    A screenplay though, it’s so much more. You’re only a part of it. The director’s going to make it his own. The actors will, too. The way it’s cut will alter it, too. You’ve written a blueprint, a plan, a recipe with action and dialogue, and it’s up to others to cook it up.

    The part about this that’s awesome is the lack of pressure: it is oddly freeing to be a part — admittedly, an absolutely necessary part — of the process rather than The Only Known Quantity.

    It feels lighter, somehow.

    Less straining.

    Once more: it feels kinda Zen.

    Any Questions?

    Man, I kinda feel like that was a boring post. Let’s liven it up with some questions or thoughts from you, the ever-critical peanut gallery. Whazzup? Whatchoo got? Anything you want to know? Any thoughts you want to share about scripting? About that versus novels? C’mon. Jump in the water. It’s warm. Probably because I peed in it. Shut up.

    Share
    August 24th, 2010 | terribleminds | 8 Comments

About The Author

ChuckWendig

Chuck Wendig is equal parts novelist, screenwriter, and game designer. He is the author of the novels DOUBLE DEAD, BLACKBIRDS, and MOCKINGBIRD. In addition, he's got a metric boatload of writing-related e-books available, including the popular 500 WAYS TO BE A BETTER WRITER. He currently lives in the wilds of Pennsyltucky with wife, dog, and newborn progeny.

8 Responses and Counting...

  • Rick Carroll 08.24.2010

    I, as well, love writing a script. But do you know what my favorite part is? It forces you to think visually, because every line in a script is fucking sacred. One to many and you’ve done to much – it’s the ultimate expression of “show, don’t tell”. With 120 pages, you don’t have time to bullshit around and make yourself sound smarter than you are. And if you get to do rewrites, pruning it to 90 or working on the shooting script is even more intense.

    Love it. Love this post. Love.

  • I’ve never actually written a screenplay. But… having started college as a technical theatre major and having attempted writing stageplays a handful of times now, it seems like all the points above could also apply to the stage.

    My questions, then, are these: What’s different and/or what’s unique about writing for the screen rather than the stage? What elements are more important in one than the other? Does it work to apply the same principles?

    To me, the stage is more restrictive. You have to stick to what’s physically possible in the space, and remember that you have a limited amount of space in which to work your magic. And yet, amazing things are being done (on amazing budgets, of course) even in those constraints, as if being confined to the black box has made us even more eager to break out of it in new and exciting ways.

    One of my downfalls in trying to write script is the very fact that I’ve worked on the tech side of things. No matter what I do, I keep wanting to come up with sets and technical things myself, and I know I include far too much action– rather like I don’t trust whoever would hypothetically be directing it to do what I want with it, which is NOT in the spirit of collaborative effort of any stage/screen production. I suppose that’s something that can be fixed and trimmed out.

  • One of Steven Barnes’ recommendations for writing a novel was to take out all the dialogue for a scene and then script it out screenplay-style to see how it “looked.” I love this exercise and it has made some amazing differences when trying to decide what to cut. I do it for all my short stories now.

  • 8dnail –

    Never worked on any stage work, but I can absolutely see that being a more restrictive platform, yeah.

    For me, the great thing about script work is I’m wholly non-technical. :) So, for better or for worse, my imagination does whatever the fuck it wants. I just kick it in the ass and let it run.

    – c.

  • @Spomenka:

    Love that suggestion. Love love love it.

    – c.

  • If you want some novels that are dang close to that “can’t take a word out” ideal, read some of Ursula K. Le Guin’s latest stuff. She has become a master at including only the essential in her stories. (No 800-page fantasy bricks from her!)

  • You know, it’s funny. I’m in school for screenwriting as a trade, and I recently had an experience when I had to reduce a story to its most barest bones.

    Lemme ‘splain. I was teaching science at a summer camp, and the boss said to me “Patrick, you’re a film person, would you teach a film elective for the camp?” and since, you know, job, I said “Yes”.

    So here I am, trying to explain the basics of telling a story to a bunch of kids who all want to have a part in the creative process and I eventually tell them “Look, a story has three things. A dude. Something the dude wants. And something stopping that dude from getting something.”

    There was also a story about a dragonslayer who wanted a glass of water.

    And, wouldn’t you know it, writing a script for the most barebones of stories for 10-year olds was a really helpful experience for me. It was like the sniper rifle thing you’re talking about there, only moreso because this was about ten minutes of film for kids. It reminded me that behind a lot of the rigamarole and clever devices and visual storytelling, it must always come down to a conflict. A dude. A desire. Something stopping that dude from getting it. And if you can’t voice that, you don’t know what the story’s about yet.

  • @Patrick:

    Well-said. You should write your own bit on that experience. Sounds enlightening along a number of axes!

    – c.

Leave a Reply

* Name, Email, and Comment are Required