That Writer Don’t Read Fictions

MidlandThis post might get a little rambly. Just pretend you’re talking to that really old uncle who has senile dementia, and he smells a little like turned cheese; hold your nose, and wait for him to get to the point.

I write fiction, and I don’t read much of it, anymore.

This goes against some advice you’ll see. If you write fiction, you’d better read fiction.

This is true, maybe, to a point. But I’m not sure how dogmatic you need to be about it.

Now, let’s flash back a ways. I am a writer very much because of Robert McCammon. His work convinced me that it’s what I wanted to do for my life’s work. I followed his journey as a mid-list horror writer to a bestselling horror writer to a guy who was trying not to write only horror anymore, to a depressed author who couldn’t stand that the market couldn’t apparently abide him doing what he loved, to a reformed and resurgent storyteller of fascinating historical mysteries.

I consumed every interview I could about McCammon (and when the day comes that I can meet the guy and thank him in person, I will have found a kind of transcendental moment). In one of those interviews, they asked him “who he was reading right now” (which is probably like, “who are you wearing right now?” except for writers instead of red carpet walking actresses), and McCammon said that he didn’t read much fiction anymore. Instead, he read a lot of books about history as well as a handful of other non-fiction books.

At the time, I was a bit floored. Wait, what? The fiction writer doesn’t read fiction? Pfeh! How does he keep his pen-blade sharp? How does he know what his peers are doing? Isn’t he committed to upping his game?

Fast-forward many-a-year, and here I am. I write fiction, and I don’t read much fiction.

And I now get it.

Here’s what I think is maybe the case — when you’re starting out, you need to study what’s come before. You need to see the styles of other writers. How they do things. How they arrange ideas, language, characters, plot threads. You maybe ape one writer’s style (me, it was McCammon). Then, you maybe pull in the styles of other writers (for me, Lansdale, King, Joyce, DeLillo, Moore). Then, somewhere out of that crazy mish-mash, you find Your Voice crying out from under the pile of Other Voices, because you’ve probably almost smothered the dear thing.

At that point, it’s not that you don’t have more to learn, but you’re at a stage where you can’t really keep treading water.

Let’s say you want to write a novel about the CIA. You’re comfortable enough with your own voice and ability. You move forward.

Do you read a bunch of novels about the CIA? Maybe. But probably not. What you do instead is, you read a bunch of non-fiction books about the agency. You do research. You read two, three, ten books. You read articles. If you’re really intrepid, you do some interviews (I am so not at that stage yet, but I’d like to be).

Okay, maybe you’re saying, “But Chuck, shouldn’t you read the current market? Shouldn’t you know what’s trending? What ground has been covered before? Don’t you want to be original?”

Yes, maybe, and that’s reason to maybe read a novel or three. But. But!

Listen, if you will, to what novelist Ari Marmell (once a White Wolf freelancer like li’l ol’ me) said about originality on Facebook, recently:

“‘Originality’ in fiction is overrated. I’m not saying it’s not valuable, necessarily, but good writing, interesting characters, and entertaining plots are all of FAR greater importance. Originality that grows organically via the above is a good thing. But when originality is the GOAL, and comes at the expense of the above, it’s a detriment.”

Dude. Yes. Applause.

You have your own way of saying things, your own way of doing things. You have Your Voice, so use it. Don’t worry about what other people are doing. You can’t. Because you can’t know what a thousand other unpublished books are doing. Trends move too fast for you to write a novel that embraces them. Write what you want, write it well, and don’t obsess over what others in your genre are doing.

I’m not saying, “Stop reading fiction.” I do still read it, but at a far reduced rate from what I once did — I maybe read 10% of the fiction I used to. It’s not that I don’t enjoy it. I do. But time is scarce, and I enjoy non-fiction equally (non-fiction tells a story, too — and is useful, to boot, what with all that silly “knowledge” contained within), and I also find that my vision isn’t muddied when I keep it largely clear of other people’s fictive endeavors. If I only read horror novels, how is my brain growing? All I’m doing is filling it up with other people’s ideas and characters. I can’t synthesize anything of my own; it’s all Other People’s IP swimming around upstairs.

The nice thing about this is, I don’t read other novels because I feel I have to. I once had that mindset. “I want to write a fantasy novel, so I’d better read some fantasy.” When I read fiction at this point, it’s purely out of pleasure and the desire to do so. There’s a new Lansdale and a new McCammon coming up — what, you think I won’t read those? I’m hungry for ‘em. You know your mother? The woman from whose womb you wriggled? I’d kill her to have a copy of those books early. Seriously. Don’t test the Wendig or your mother will eat the dirt pipe.

I don’t have any great conclusion here — I’ve been pondering on this point for a while, and Eddy Webb inadvertently pushed me to put this up with his new poll asking how many RPG designers have a game collection they don’t use for playing, that they use only for reading and research. I just continue to look at my shelves and the stack of books on my bedside table, and I notice how fiction is less and less a part of that. I’d expect to feel weird about it, but I don’t. I’m comfortable with it. I actually think it’s giving me a clearer directive. Your mileage may vary, of course.

Oh, one last plug for now: my short story, “Product Placement” is alive at Jet Pack. Go there. Read it. Even though I just told you to read less fiction; that doesn’t include the stuff I write, of course. Sheesh.

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 at 11:48 AM and is filed under The Ramble. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 Responses to “That Writer Don’t Read Fictions”

Filamena June 16th, 2009 at 12:02 PM

If you’re writing genre (did you know Horror is dead? Scary, huh?) and you read nothing in it, you’re only real problem is that you’re going to write Twilight and anyone who has read everything in that genre will be able to tell you don’t know jack. I feel like fiction needs to be read for pleasure even as a writer. You need to read some classics (in your genre and without) and some modern stuff to see what your peers are doing (anthologies are GREAT for this, by the way.) Some people can and do naturally read a hundred books a second, I can’t. I read slow and make out with every page. If I tried to speed that up so I could ‘know the market better’ I wouldn’t get anything out of it. It would be work, and the only WORK I do should be writing my crap.

This does not apply to non fiction. That should and must be done at every second of the day. News papers, articles, journals, academic works, constant stream of that, please’n'thank you.

Will June 16th, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Whew. I thought it was just me. I thought I was reading more non-fiction because I was writing more in a non-fiction style, back when. Since then, I find that reading fiction makes me want to write fiction and that reading non-fiction makes me able to write fiction.

Ari — the kind of writer who makes me hate myself by combining both talent and skill with being a nice guy — is not only right, but he said it rightly. That’s a great quote.

I have also voted, now, in Eddy’s poll. If anyone would like to purchase a part of my game collection, lately I need money more than I need old Mystara boxes with CDs in them for research.

Rob Donoghue June 16th, 2009 at 12:20 PM

Something about this makes me nervous. That you shouldn’t read to keep up with trends, yes, sure, I can totally get behind that. But this argument can just as easily be transformed into a more general argument against reading fiction, which seems ultimately counterproductive. The part of this which is about writing totally makes sense. The part that is about _reading_ is where that uncertain sensation lies.

-Rob D.

PS – On a practical level, it also makes it rough to find new authors.

Will June 16th, 2009 at 3:32 PM

In my case, I am actually reading more fiction this year already than I did last year, since I’m focusing on fiction more this year. The point, at least for me, is that I still probably read more nonfiction than fiction — and that I have always been one who savors books rather than devours them. Fiction I read especially slowly, because I stop to dismantle it almost constantly.

I am not saying this is the smart or right way, just what I do.

Chuck June 16th, 2009 at 4:37 PM

Rob:

Well — I’m not advocating this for general readers. I’m only suggesting this might be the case for writers.

Also, my concern is that your argument puts non-fiction above fiction as a priority. I find new authors all the time; most of them just happen to be in the non-fiction field.

I see what you’re getting at, and I don’t disagree — the blog post is merely an effort to explain why some writers pull back from reading fiction as much as they used to. I still read it. I still love it. But, like Will, I savor it, so I’m slow with fiction and fast with non-fiction. He nailed it, I think: fiction just makes me want to write fiction, but non-fiction gives me the tools to write fiction.

And to prove that I find new writers, still…

:)

Daryl Gregory! Go. Read “Pandemonium.”

Stat!

– c.

Chuck June 16th, 2009 at 4:47 PM

Filamena:

Horror’s been dead for years, that’s what’s awesome. It’s basically a zombie! Lurching about, moaning, knocking lamps off of tables in a quest for brains.

Someone in their respective genre should endeavor to read the classics, and should have an established reading base. Anybody in their respective industry needs that level of fundamentals. And keeping up with favored new writers is good, but I don’t think one should necessarily go out of his or her way to do so. I think you should just read what you like. I don’t go out of my way to pick up horror novels. I go out of my way to just… read authors I like, or books that sound good, regardless of genre. Genre alone isn’t worth emulating. Every book isn’t a lesson anymore, y’know?

And, I have no desire to read Twilight. I really don’t. But Meyers catches a bad rap — and, if the advice is, “She didn’t read the classics and look where she is,” let’s all remember that where she is happens to be sitting pretty on top of a stack of money and basking in the obsessive glow of rabid fans. No harm, no foul to her for making kids want to read books — look at her that way. Kids who read her are now readers. They may not have been before. They’re going to need to eventually move onto other stuff. That’s where you come in. And me, and Will, and whoever else is ready to take a stab at it.

(Plus, she’s not writing in the horror genre, really. She’s writing in the paranormal romance genre, which is probably right in line with her books.)

Again, I’m cool if you don’t dig the books. I haven’t read them, and almost certainly won’t. But she’s successful. Gotta be some reason that’s the case, for good or ill.

Filamena June 16th, 2009 at 6:45 PM

In this case, Chuck, I’m not knocking Meyers for writing something without knowing the mythos. Bah on that. In this case I’m saying that if you’re starting out, you’ve only ready Twilight, Twilight is all you’re going to write.

At your level, you’ve read more then Twilight. You should be reading for pleasure again because, as you said, you’ve found your voice.

Chuck June 16th, 2009 at 6:52 PM

Totally agreed. New fiction writers should be absorbing a megaton of other people’s fiction. In-genre and out. Literary fiction, too — read Joyce, Milton, Chaucer, Tim O’Brien, Don DeLillo, Shelley, Eliot, etc.

– c.

In Other Words » Blog Archive » Book Review: The Betrayal July 23rd, 2009 at 10:57 AM

[...] you have to read.’ A good friend of mine had something of an argument against that old trope you can read here. Still, I actually like reading, and so I still wish I had more time to read. It recharges [...]

Leave a Reply